Cargando…

Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for approximately 20% of mammographically detected breast cancers. Although DCIS is generally highly curable, some women with DCIS will develop life-threatening invasive breast cancer, but the determinants of progression to infiltrating ductal can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moelans, Cathy B., de Wegers, Roel A., Monsuurs, Hanneke N., Maess, Anoek H. J., van Diest, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21547576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13402-011-0043-7
_version_ 1782216906139238400
author Moelans, Cathy B.
de Wegers, Roel A.
Monsuurs, Hanneke N.
Maess, Anoek H. J.
van Diest, Paul J.
author_facet Moelans, Cathy B.
de Wegers, Roel A.
Monsuurs, Hanneke N.
Maess, Anoek H. J.
van Diest, Paul J.
author_sort Moelans, Cathy B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for approximately 20% of mammographically detected breast cancers. Although DCIS is generally highly curable, some women with DCIS will develop life-threatening invasive breast cancer, but the determinants of progression to infiltrating ductal cancer (IDC) are largely unknown. METHODS: In the current study, we used multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), a multiplex PCR-based test, to compare copy numbers of 21 breast cancer related genes between laser-microdissected DCIS and adjacent IDC lesions in 39 patients. Genes included in this study were ESR1, EGFR, FGFR1, ADAM9, IKBKB, PRDM14, MTDH, MYC, CCND1, EMSY, CDH1, TRAF4, CPD, MED1, HER2, CDC6, TOP2A, MAPT, BIRC5, CCNE1 and AURKA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in copy number for the 21 genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC. Low/intermediate-grade DCIS showed on average 6 gains/amplifications versus 8 in high-grade DCIS (p = 0.158). Furthermore, alterations of AURKA and CCNE1 were exclusively found in high-grade DCIS, and HER2, PRDM14 and EMSY amplification was more frequent in high-grade DCIS than in low/intermediate-grade DCIS. In contrast, the average number of alterations in low/intermediate and high grade IDC was similar, and although EGFR alterations were exclusively found in high grade IDC compared to low/intermediate-grade IDC, there were generally fewer differences between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade IDC than between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade DCIS. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, there were no significant differences in copy number for 21 breast cancer related genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC, indicating that DCIS is genetically as advanced as its invasive counterpart. However, high grade DCIS showed more copy number changes than low/intermediate grade DCIS with specifically involved genes, supporting a model in which different histological grades of DCIS are associated with distinct genomic changes that progress to IDC in different routes. These high grade DCIS specific genes may be potential targets for treatment and/or predict progression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13402-011-0043-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3219861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32198612011-12-09 Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study Moelans, Cathy B. de Wegers, Roel A. Monsuurs, Hanneke N. Maess, Anoek H. J. van Diest, Paul J. Cell Oncol (Dordr) Original Paper BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for approximately 20% of mammographically detected breast cancers. Although DCIS is generally highly curable, some women with DCIS will develop life-threatening invasive breast cancer, but the determinants of progression to infiltrating ductal cancer (IDC) are largely unknown. METHODS: In the current study, we used multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), a multiplex PCR-based test, to compare copy numbers of 21 breast cancer related genes between laser-microdissected DCIS and adjacent IDC lesions in 39 patients. Genes included in this study were ESR1, EGFR, FGFR1, ADAM9, IKBKB, PRDM14, MTDH, MYC, CCND1, EMSY, CDH1, TRAF4, CPD, MED1, HER2, CDC6, TOP2A, MAPT, BIRC5, CCNE1 and AURKA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in copy number for the 21 genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC. Low/intermediate-grade DCIS showed on average 6 gains/amplifications versus 8 in high-grade DCIS (p = 0.158). Furthermore, alterations of AURKA and CCNE1 were exclusively found in high-grade DCIS, and HER2, PRDM14 and EMSY amplification was more frequent in high-grade DCIS than in low/intermediate-grade DCIS. In contrast, the average number of alterations in low/intermediate and high grade IDC was similar, and although EGFR alterations were exclusively found in high grade IDC compared to low/intermediate-grade IDC, there were generally fewer differences between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade IDC than between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade DCIS. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, there were no significant differences in copy number for 21 breast cancer related genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC, indicating that DCIS is genetically as advanced as its invasive counterpart. However, high grade DCIS showed more copy number changes than low/intermediate grade DCIS with specifically involved genes, supporting a model in which different histological grades of DCIS are associated with distinct genomic changes that progress to IDC in different routes. These high grade DCIS specific genes may be potential targets for treatment and/or predict progression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13402-011-0043-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2011-05-06 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3219861/ /pubmed/21547576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13402-011-0043-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Moelans, Cathy B.
de Wegers, Roel A.
Monsuurs, Hanneke N.
Maess, Anoek H. J.
van Diest, Paul J.
Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study
title Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study
title_full Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study
title_fullStr Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study
title_full_unstemmed Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study
title_short Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study
title_sort molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21547576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13402-011-0043-7
work_keys_str_mv AT moelanscathyb moleculardifferencesbetweenductalcarcinomainsituandadjacentinvasivebreastcarcinomaamultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationstudy
AT dewegersroela moleculardifferencesbetweenductalcarcinomainsituandadjacentinvasivebreastcarcinomaamultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationstudy
AT monsuurshanneken moleculardifferencesbetweenductalcarcinomainsituandadjacentinvasivebreastcarcinomaamultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationstudy
AT maessanoekhj moleculardifferencesbetweenductalcarcinomainsituandadjacentinvasivebreastcarcinomaamultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationstudy
AT vandiestpaulj moleculardifferencesbetweenductalcarcinomainsituandadjacentinvasivebreastcarcinomaamultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationstudy