Cargando…
Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters
INTRODUCTION: Although less invasive than pulmonary artery catheters (PACs), arterial pulse pressure analysis techniques for estimating cardiac output (CO) have not been simultaneously compared to PAC bolus thermodilution CO (COtd) or continuous CO (CCO) devices. METHODS: We compared the accuracy, b...
Autores principales: | Hadian, Mehrnaz, Kim, Hyung Kook, Severyn, Donald A, Pinsky, Michael R |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3220011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9335 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Non-invasive assessment of cardiac index: comparison between PiCCO and LiDCO
por: Donati, A, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Comparison the accuracy and trending ability of cardiac index measured by the fourth-generation of FloTrac with the PiCCO device in septic shock patients
por: KHWANNIMIT, Bodin, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of stroke volume changes of LiDCO™plus and Flotrac™ during postoperative hemodynamic optimization
por: Costa, MG, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Pulse contour analysis for cardiac output measurement in patients after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison of FloTrac and PiCCO(plus )with intermittent thermodilution
por: Hofer, C, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Prediction of fluid responsiveness with the LiDCO system
por: De Santis, P, et al.
Publicado: (2011)