Cargando…

Mechanisms of leukocyte distribution during sepsis: an experimental study on the interdependence of cell activation, shear stress and endothelial injury

INTRODUCTION: This study was carried out to determine whether interactions of cell activation, shear stress and platelets at sites of endothelial injury explain the paradoxical maldistribution of activated leukocytes during sepsis away from local sites of infection towards disseminated leukocyte acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ploppa, Annette, Schmidt, Volker, Hientz, Andreas, Reutershan, Joerg, Haeberle, Helene A, Nohé, Boris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3220016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21059228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9322
_version_ 1782216931589226496
author Ploppa, Annette
Schmidt, Volker
Hientz, Andreas
Reutershan, Joerg
Haeberle, Helene A
Nohé, Boris
author_facet Ploppa, Annette
Schmidt, Volker
Hientz, Andreas
Reutershan, Joerg
Haeberle, Helene A
Nohé, Boris
author_sort Ploppa, Annette
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study was carried out to determine whether interactions of cell activation, shear stress and platelets at sites of endothelial injury explain the paradoxical maldistribution of activated leukocytes during sepsis away from local sites of infection towards disseminated leukocyte accumulation at remote sites. METHODS: Human umbilical venous endothelial cells (HUVEC) and polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) were activated with lipopolysaccharide at 100 and 10 ng/ml to achieve adhesion molecule patterns as have been reported from the hyper- and hypo-inflammatory stage of sepsis. To examine effects of leukocyte activation on leukocyte-endothelial interactions, activated HUVEC were perfused with activated and non-activated neutrophils in a parallel plate flow chamber. Adhesion molecule expression and function were assessed by flow cytometry and blocking antibodies. In a subset of experiments the sub-endothelial matrix was exposed and covered with platelets to account for the effects of endothelial injury. To investigate interactions of these effects with flow, all experiments were done at various shear stress levels (3 to 0.25 dyne/cm(2)). Leukocyte-endothelial interactions were analyzed by videomicroscopy and analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Activation of neutrophils rendered adhesion increasingly dependent on shear stress reduction. At normal shear stress, shedding of L-selectin decreased adhesion by 56%. Increased rolling fractions of activated PMN at low shear stress revealed impaired integrin affinity despite numerical up-regulation of CD11b. On sub-maximally activated, intact HUVEC shear stress became the prevailing determinant of adhesion. Presence of a platelet-covered injury with high surface density of P-selectin was the strongest variable for adhesion. When compared to maximally activated HUVEC, platelets increased neutrophil adhesion by 2.7-fold. At sub-maximal activation a 10-fold increase was observed (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: L-selectin shedding and integrin dysfunction render leukocyte adhesion increasingly susceptible to shear stress and alternative adhesion receptors. In combination, these effects inhibit recruitment to normally perfused sites with intact endothelium and favor maldistribution towards sites with compromised perfusion or endothelial injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3220016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32200162011-11-18 Mechanisms of leukocyte distribution during sepsis: an experimental study on the interdependence of cell activation, shear stress and endothelial injury Ploppa, Annette Schmidt, Volker Hientz, Andreas Reutershan, Joerg Haeberle, Helene A Nohé, Boris Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: This study was carried out to determine whether interactions of cell activation, shear stress and platelets at sites of endothelial injury explain the paradoxical maldistribution of activated leukocytes during sepsis away from local sites of infection towards disseminated leukocyte accumulation at remote sites. METHODS: Human umbilical venous endothelial cells (HUVEC) and polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) were activated with lipopolysaccharide at 100 and 10 ng/ml to achieve adhesion molecule patterns as have been reported from the hyper- and hypo-inflammatory stage of sepsis. To examine effects of leukocyte activation on leukocyte-endothelial interactions, activated HUVEC were perfused with activated and non-activated neutrophils in a parallel plate flow chamber. Adhesion molecule expression and function were assessed by flow cytometry and blocking antibodies. In a subset of experiments the sub-endothelial matrix was exposed and covered with platelets to account for the effects of endothelial injury. To investigate interactions of these effects with flow, all experiments were done at various shear stress levels (3 to 0.25 dyne/cm(2)). Leukocyte-endothelial interactions were analyzed by videomicroscopy and analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Activation of neutrophils rendered adhesion increasingly dependent on shear stress reduction. At normal shear stress, shedding of L-selectin decreased adhesion by 56%. Increased rolling fractions of activated PMN at low shear stress revealed impaired integrin affinity despite numerical up-regulation of CD11b. On sub-maximally activated, intact HUVEC shear stress became the prevailing determinant of adhesion. Presence of a platelet-covered injury with high surface density of P-selectin was the strongest variable for adhesion. When compared to maximally activated HUVEC, platelets increased neutrophil adhesion by 2.7-fold. At sub-maximal activation a 10-fold increase was observed (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: L-selectin shedding and integrin dysfunction render leukocyte adhesion increasingly susceptible to shear stress and alternative adhesion receptors. In combination, these effects inhibit recruitment to normally perfused sites with intact endothelium and favor maldistribution towards sites with compromised perfusion or endothelial injury. BioMed Central 2010 2010-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3220016/ /pubmed/21059228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9322 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ploppa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ploppa, Annette
Schmidt, Volker
Hientz, Andreas
Reutershan, Joerg
Haeberle, Helene A
Nohé, Boris
Mechanisms of leukocyte distribution during sepsis: an experimental study on the interdependence of cell activation, shear stress and endothelial injury
title Mechanisms of leukocyte distribution during sepsis: an experimental study on the interdependence of cell activation, shear stress and endothelial injury
title_full Mechanisms of leukocyte distribution during sepsis: an experimental study on the interdependence of cell activation, shear stress and endothelial injury
title_fullStr Mechanisms of leukocyte distribution during sepsis: an experimental study on the interdependence of cell activation, shear stress and endothelial injury
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms of leukocyte distribution during sepsis: an experimental study on the interdependence of cell activation, shear stress and endothelial injury
title_short Mechanisms of leukocyte distribution during sepsis: an experimental study on the interdependence of cell activation, shear stress and endothelial injury
title_sort mechanisms of leukocyte distribution during sepsis: an experimental study on the interdependence of cell activation, shear stress and endothelial injury
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3220016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21059228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9322
work_keys_str_mv AT ploppaannette mechanismsofleukocytedistributionduringsepsisanexperimentalstudyontheinterdependenceofcellactivationshearstressandendothelialinjury
AT schmidtvolker mechanismsofleukocytedistributionduringsepsisanexperimentalstudyontheinterdependenceofcellactivationshearstressandendothelialinjury
AT hientzandreas mechanismsofleukocytedistributionduringsepsisanexperimentalstudyontheinterdependenceofcellactivationshearstressandendothelialinjury
AT reutershanjoerg mechanismsofleukocytedistributionduringsepsisanexperimentalstudyontheinterdependenceofcellactivationshearstressandendothelialinjury
AT haeberlehelenea mechanismsofleukocytedistributionduringsepsisanexperimentalstudyontheinterdependenceofcellactivationshearstressandendothelialinjury
AT noheboris mechanismsofleukocytedistributionduringsepsisanexperimentalstudyontheinterdependenceofcellactivationshearstressandendothelialinjury