Cargando…

Rational or rationalized choices in fluid resuscitation?

The war between colloids and crystalloids wages on. In a large multinational survey of fluid prescribing practices in critically ill patients, we have a new and intriguing snapshot of global fluid resuscitation practices. Colloids are more often used for impaired perfusion or low cardiac output, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Jenny, Martin, Greg S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3220017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9305
_version_ 1782216931810476032
author Han, Jenny
Martin, Greg S
author_facet Han, Jenny
Martin, Greg S
author_sort Han, Jenny
collection PubMed
description The war between colloids and crystalloids wages on. In a large multinational survey of fluid prescribing practices in critically ill patients, we have a new and intriguing snapshot of global fluid resuscitation practices. Colloids are more often used for impaired perfusion or low cardiac output, and the choice of colloid or crystalloid varies enormously between countries. Why are some ICUs prescribing colloids more often than crystalloids when there is little convincing evidence that colloids are superior for fluid resuscitation? Are colloids advantageous in certain diseases, or in specific regional patient populations that have not yet been elucidated? Perhaps we should look inwards: the answer may not be more randomized clinical trials, but better adherence to current guidelines and treatment recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3220017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32200172011-11-18 Rational or rationalized choices in fluid resuscitation? Han, Jenny Martin, Greg S Crit Care Commentary The war between colloids and crystalloids wages on. In a large multinational survey of fluid prescribing practices in critically ill patients, we have a new and intriguing snapshot of global fluid resuscitation practices. Colloids are more often used for impaired perfusion or low cardiac output, and the choice of colloid or crystalloid varies enormously between countries. Why are some ICUs prescribing colloids more often than crystalloids when there is little convincing evidence that colloids are superior for fluid resuscitation? Are colloids advantageous in certain diseases, or in specific regional patient populations that have not yet been elucidated? Perhaps we should look inwards: the answer may not be more randomized clinical trials, but better adherence to current guidelines and treatment recommendations. BioMed Central 2010 2010-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3220017/ /pubmed/21092151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9305 Text en Copyright ©2010 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Han, Jenny
Martin, Greg S
Rational or rationalized choices in fluid resuscitation?
title Rational or rationalized choices in fluid resuscitation?
title_full Rational or rationalized choices in fluid resuscitation?
title_fullStr Rational or rationalized choices in fluid resuscitation?
title_full_unstemmed Rational or rationalized choices in fluid resuscitation?
title_short Rational or rationalized choices in fluid resuscitation?
title_sort rational or rationalized choices in fluid resuscitation?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3220017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9305
work_keys_str_mv AT hanjenny rationalorrationalizedchoicesinfluidresuscitation
AT martingregs rationalorrationalizedchoicesinfluidresuscitation