Cargando…

Topological FDR for neuroimaging

In this technical note, we describe and validate a topological false discovery rate (FDR) procedure for statistical parametric mapping. This procedure is designed to deal with signal that is continuous and has, in principle, unbounded spatial support. We therefore infer on topological features of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chumbley, J., Worsley, K., Flandin, G., Friston, K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3221040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19944173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.090
_version_ 1782217024652443648
author Chumbley, J.
Worsley, K.
Flandin, G.
Friston, K.
author_facet Chumbley, J.
Worsley, K.
Flandin, G.
Friston, K.
author_sort Chumbley, J.
collection PubMed
description In this technical note, we describe and validate a topological false discovery rate (FDR) procedure for statistical parametric mapping. This procedure is designed to deal with signal that is continuous and has, in principle, unbounded spatial support. We therefore infer on topological features of the signal, such as the existence of local maxima or peaks above some threshold. Using results from random field theory, we assign a p-value to each maximum in an SPM and identify an adaptive threshold that controls false discovery rate, using the Benjamini and Hochberg (BH) procedure (1995). This provides a natural complement to conventional family wise error (FWE) control on local maxima. We use simulations to contrast these procedures; both in terms of their relative number of discoveries and their spatial accuracy (via the distribution of the Euclidian distance between true and discovered activations). We also assessed two other procedures: cluster-wise and voxel-wise FDR procedures. Our results suggest that (a) FDR control of maxima or peaks is more sensitive than FWE control of peaks with minimal cost in terms of false-positives, (b) voxel-wise FDR is substantially less accurate than topological FWE or FDR control. Finally, we present an illustrative application using an fMRI study of visual attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3221040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32210402012-01-10 Topological FDR for neuroimaging Chumbley, J. Worsley, K. Flandin, G. Friston, K. Neuroimage Technical Note In this technical note, we describe and validate a topological false discovery rate (FDR) procedure for statistical parametric mapping. This procedure is designed to deal with signal that is continuous and has, in principle, unbounded spatial support. We therefore infer on topological features of the signal, such as the existence of local maxima or peaks above some threshold. Using results from random field theory, we assign a p-value to each maximum in an SPM and identify an adaptive threshold that controls false discovery rate, using the Benjamini and Hochberg (BH) procedure (1995). This provides a natural complement to conventional family wise error (FWE) control on local maxima. We use simulations to contrast these procedures; both in terms of their relative number of discoveries and their spatial accuracy (via the distribution of the Euclidian distance between true and discovered activations). We also assessed two other procedures: cluster-wise and voxel-wise FDR procedures. Our results suggest that (a) FDR control of maxima or peaks is more sensitive than FWE control of peaks with minimal cost in terms of false-positives, (b) voxel-wise FDR is substantially less accurate than topological FWE or FDR control. Finally, we present an illustrative application using an fMRI study of visual attention. Academic Press 2010-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3221040/ /pubmed/19944173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.090 Text en © 2010 Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Technical Note
Chumbley, J.
Worsley, K.
Flandin, G.
Friston, K.
Topological FDR for neuroimaging
title Topological FDR for neuroimaging
title_full Topological FDR for neuroimaging
title_fullStr Topological FDR for neuroimaging
title_full_unstemmed Topological FDR for neuroimaging
title_short Topological FDR for neuroimaging
title_sort topological fdr for neuroimaging
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3221040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19944173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.090
work_keys_str_mv AT chumbleyj topologicalfdrforneuroimaging
AT worsleyk topologicalfdrforneuroimaging
AT flanding topologicalfdrforneuroimaging
AT fristonk topologicalfdrforneuroimaging