Cargando…

Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Attrition from follow-up is a major methodological challenge in randomized trials. Incentives are known to improve response rates in cross-sectional postal and online surveys, yet few studies have investigated whether they can reduce attrition from follow-up in online trials, which are p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khadjesari, Zarnie, Murray, Elizabeth, Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria, White, Ian R, McCambridge, Jim, Thompson, Simon G, Wallace, Paul, Godfrey, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3221348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21371988
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1523
_version_ 1782217077846704128
author Khadjesari, Zarnie
Murray, Elizabeth
Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria
White, Ian R
McCambridge, Jim
Thompson, Simon G
Wallace, Paul
Godfrey, Christine
author_facet Khadjesari, Zarnie
Murray, Elizabeth
Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria
White, Ian R
McCambridge, Jim
Thompson, Simon G
Wallace, Paul
Godfrey, Christine
author_sort Khadjesari, Zarnie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Attrition from follow-up is a major methodological challenge in randomized trials. Incentives are known to improve response rates in cross-sectional postal and online surveys, yet few studies have investigated whether they can reduce attrition from follow-up in online trials, which are particularly vulnerable to low follow-up rates. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine the impact of incentives on follow-up rates in an online trial. METHODS: Two randomized controlled trials were embedded in a large online trial of a Web-based intervention to reduce alcohol consumption (the Down Your Drink randomized controlled trial, DYD-RCT). Participants were those in the DYD pilot trial eligible for 3-month follow-up (study 1) and those eligible for 12-month follow-up in the DYD main trial (study 2). Participants in both studies were randomly allocated to receive an offer of an incentive or to receive no offer of an incentive. In study 1, participants in the incentive arm were randomly offered a £5 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher, a £5 charity donation to Cancer Research UK, or entry in a prize draw for £250. In study 2, participants in the incentive arm were offered a £10 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who completed follow-up questionnaires in the incentive arm(s) compared with the no incentive arm. RESULTS: In study 1 (n = 1226), there was no significant difference in response rates between those participants offered an incentive (175/615, 29%) and those with no offer (162/611, 27%) (difference = 2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] –3% to 7%). There was no significant difference in response rates among the three different incentives offered. In study 2 (n = 2591), response rates were 9% higher in the group offered an incentive (476/1296, 37%) than in the group not offered an incentive (364/1295, 28%) (difference = 9%, 95% CI 5% to 12%, P < .001). The incremental cost per extra successful follow-up in the incentive arm was £110 in study 1 and £52 in study 2. CONCLUSION: Whereas an offer of a £10 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher can increase follow-up rates in online trials, an offer of a lower incentive may not. The marginal costs involved require careful consideration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN31070347; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN31070347 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5wgr5pl3s)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3221348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32213482011-11-21 Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials Khadjesari, Zarnie Murray, Elizabeth Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria White, Ian R McCambridge, Jim Thompson, Simon G Wallace, Paul Godfrey, Christine J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Attrition from follow-up is a major methodological challenge in randomized trials. Incentives are known to improve response rates in cross-sectional postal and online surveys, yet few studies have investigated whether they can reduce attrition from follow-up in online trials, which are particularly vulnerable to low follow-up rates. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine the impact of incentives on follow-up rates in an online trial. METHODS: Two randomized controlled trials were embedded in a large online trial of a Web-based intervention to reduce alcohol consumption (the Down Your Drink randomized controlled trial, DYD-RCT). Participants were those in the DYD pilot trial eligible for 3-month follow-up (study 1) and those eligible for 12-month follow-up in the DYD main trial (study 2). Participants in both studies were randomly allocated to receive an offer of an incentive or to receive no offer of an incentive. In study 1, participants in the incentive arm were randomly offered a £5 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher, a £5 charity donation to Cancer Research UK, or entry in a prize draw for £250. In study 2, participants in the incentive arm were offered a £10 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who completed follow-up questionnaires in the incentive arm(s) compared with the no incentive arm. RESULTS: In study 1 (n = 1226), there was no significant difference in response rates between those participants offered an incentive (175/615, 29%) and those with no offer (162/611, 27%) (difference = 2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] –3% to 7%). There was no significant difference in response rates among the three different incentives offered. In study 2 (n = 2591), response rates were 9% higher in the group offered an incentive (476/1296, 37%) than in the group not offered an incentive (364/1295, 28%) (difference = 9%, 95% CI 5% to 12%, P < .001). The incremental cost per extra successful follow-up in the incentive arm was £110 in study 1 and £52 in study 2. CONCLUSION: Whereas an offer of a £10 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher can increase follow-up rates in online trials, an offer of a lower incentive may not. The marginal costs involved require careful consideration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN31070347; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN31070347 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5wgr5pl3s) Gunther Eysenbach 2011-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3221348/ /pubmed/21371988 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1523 Text en ©Zarnie Khadjesari, Elizabeth Murray, Eleftheria Kalaitzaki, Ian R. White, Jim McCambridge, Simon G. Thompson, Paul Wallace, Christine Godfrey. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.03.2011. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Khadjesari, Zarnie
Murray, Elizabeth
Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria
White, Ian R
McCambridge, Jim
Thompson, Simon G
Wallace, Paul
Godfrey, Christine
Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort impact and costs of incentives to reduce attrition in online trials: two randomized controlled trials
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3221348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21371988
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1523
work_keys_str_mv AT khadjesarizarnie impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT murrayelizabeth impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kalaitzakieleftheria impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT whiteianr impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mccambridgejim impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT thompsonsimong impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wallacepaul impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT godfreychristine impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials