Cargando…
Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND: Attrition from follow-up is a major methodological challenge in randomized trials. Incentives are known to improve response rates in cross-sectional postal and online surveys, yet few studies have investigated whether they can reduce attrition from follow-up in online trials, which are p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Gunther Eysenbach
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3221348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21371988 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1523 |
_version_ | 1782217077846704128 |
---|---|
author | Khadjesari, Zarnie Murray, Elizabeth Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria White, Ian R McCambridge, Jim Thompson, Simon G Wallace, Paul Godfrey, Christine |
author_facet | Khadjesari, Zarnie Murray, Elizabeth Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria White, Ian R McCambridge, Jim Thompson, Simon G Wallace, Paul Godfrey, Christine |
author_sort | Khadjesari, Zarnie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Attrition from follow-up is a major methodological challenge in randomized trials. Incentives are known to improve response rates in cross-sectional postal and online surveys, yet few studies have investigated whether they can reduce attrition from follow-up in online trials, which are particularly vulnerable to low follow-up rates. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine the impact of incentives on follow-up rates in an online trial. METHODS: Two randomized controlled trials were embedded in a large online trial of a Web-based intervention to reduce alcohol consumption (the Down Your Drink randomized controlled trial, DYD-RCT). Participants were those in the DYD pilot trial eligible for 3-month follow-up (study 1) and those eligible for 12-month follow-up in the DYD main trial (study 2). Participants in both studies were randomly allocated to receive an offer of an incentive or to receive no offer of an incentive. In study 1, participants in the incentive arm were randomly offered a £5 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher, a £5 charity donation to Cancer Research UK, or entry in a prize draw for £250. In study 2, participants in the incentive arm were offered a £10 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who completed follow-up questionnaires in the incentive arm(s) compared with the no incentive arm. RESULTS: In study 1 (n = 1226), there was no significant difference in response rates between those participants offered an incentive (175/615, 29%) and those with no offer (162/611, 27%) (difference = 2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] –3% to 7%). There was no significant difference in response rates among the three different incentives offered. In study 2 (n = 2591), response rates were 9% higher in the group offered an incentive (476/1296, 37%) than in the group not offered an incentive (364/1295, 28%) (difference = 9%, 95% CI 5% to 12%, P < .001). The incremental cost per extra successful follow-up in the incentive arm was £110 in study 1 and £52 in study 2. CONCLUSION: Whereas an offer of a £10 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher can increase follow-up rates in online trials, an offer of a lower incentive may not. The marginal costs involved require careful consideration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN31070347; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN31070347 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5wgr5pl3s) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3221348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Gunther Eysenbach |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32213482011-11-21 Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials Khadjesari, Zarnie Murray, Elizabeth Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria White, Ian R McCambridge, Jim Thompson, Simon G Wallace, Paul Godfrey, Christine J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Attrition from follow-up is a major methodological challenge in randomized trials. Incentives are known to improve response rates in cross-sectional postal and online surveys, yet few studies have investigated whether they can reduce attrition from follow-up in online trials, which are particularly vulnerable to low follow-up rates. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine the impact of incentives on follow-up rates in an online trial. METHODS: Two randomized controlled trials were embedded in a large online trial of a Web-based intervention to reduce alcohol consumption (the Down Your Drink randomized controlled trial, DYD-RCT). Participants were those in the DYD pilot trial eligible for 3-month follow-up (study 1) and those eligible for 12-month follow-up in the DYD main trial (study 2). Participants in both studies were randomly allocated to receive an offer of an incentive or to receive no offer of an incentive. In study 1, participants in the incentive arm were randomly offered a £5 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher, a £5 charity donation to Cancer Research UK, or entry in a prize draw for £250. In study 2, participants in the incentive arm were offered a £10 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who completed follow-up questionnaires in the incentive arm(s) compared with the no incentive arm. RESULTS: In study 1 (n = 1226), there was no significant difference in response rates between those participants offered an incentive (175/615, 29%) and those with no offer (162/611, 27%) (difference = 2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] –3% to 7%). There was no significant difference in response rates among the three different incentives offered. In study 2 (n = 2591), response rates were 9% higher in the group offered an incentive (476/1296, 37%) than in the group not offered an incentive (364/1295, 28%) (difference = 9%, 95% CI 5% to 12%, P < .001). The incremental cost per extra successful follow-up in the incentive arm was £110 in study 1 and £52 in study 2. CONCLUSION: Whereas an offer of a £10 Amazon.co.uk gift voucher can increase follow-up rates in online trials, an offer of a lower incentive may not. The marginal costs involved require careful consideration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN31070347; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN31070347 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5wgr5pl3s) Gunther Eysenbach 2011-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3221348/ /pubmed/21371988 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1523 Text en ©Zarnie Khadjesari, Elizabeth Murray, Eleftheria Kalaitzaki, Ian R. White, Jim McCambridge, Simon G. Thompson, Paul Wallace, Christine Godfrey. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.03.2011. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Khadjesari, Zarnie Murray, Elizabeth Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria White, Ian R McCambridge, Jim Thompson, Simon G Wallace, Paul Godfrey, Christine Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | impact and costs of incentives to reduce attrition in online trials: two randomized controlled trials |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3221348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21371988 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khadjesarizarnie impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials AT murrayelizabeth impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kalaitzakieleftheria impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials AT whiteianr impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials AT mccambridgejim impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials AT thompsonsimong impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wallacepaul impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials AT godfreychristine impactandcostsofincentivestoreduceattritioninonlinetrialstworandomizedcontrolledtrials |