Pulse contour analysis: Is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?

Three pulse contour systems for monitoring cardiac output - LiDCO Plus™, PiCCO Plus™ and FloTrac™ - were compared in postcardiac surgery patients. None of the three methods demonstrated good trending ability according to concordance analysis. Pulse contour systems remain unreliable in the haemodynam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Critchley, Lester AH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21349140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9381
_version_ 1782217157724078080
author Critchley, Lester AH
author_facet Critchley, Lester AH
author_sort Critchley, Lester AH
collection PubMed
description Three pulse contour systems for monitoring cardiac output - LiDCO Plus™, PiCCO Plus™ and FloTrac™ - were compared in postcardiac surgery patients. None of the three methods demonstrated good trending ability according to concordance analysis. Pulse contour systems remain unreliable in the haemodynamically unstable patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3222023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32220232012-01-19 Pulse contour analysis: Is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient? Critchley, Lester AH Crit Care Commentary Three pulse contour systems for monitoring cardiac output - LiDCO Plus™, PiCCO Plus™ and FloTrac™ - were compared in postcardiac surgery patients. None of the three methods demonstrated good trending ability according to concordance analysis. Pulse contour systems remain unreliable in the haemodynamically unstable patient. BioMed Central 2011 2011-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3222023/ /pubmed/21349140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9381 Text en Copyright ©2011 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Critchley, Lester AH
Pulse contour analysis: Is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?
title Pulse contour analysis: Is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?
title_full Pulse contour analysis: Is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?
title_fullStr Pulse contour analysis: Is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?
title_full_unstemmed Pulse contour analysis: Is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?
title_short Pulse contour analysis: Is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?
title_sort pulse contour analysis: is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21349140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9381
work_keys_str_mv AT critchleylesterah pulsecontouranalysisisitabletoreliablydetectchangesincardiacoutputinthehaemodynamicallyunstablepatient

Ejemplares similares