Cargando…
Circulating adenosine increases during human experimental endotoxemia but blockade of its receptor does not influence the immune response and subsequent organ injury
INTRODUCTION: Preclinical studies have shown that the endogenous nucleoside adenosine prevents excessive tissue injury during systemic inflammation. We aimed to study whether endogenous adenosine also limits tissue injury in a human in vivo model of systemic inflammation. In addition, we studied whe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21211004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9400 |
_version_ | 1782217159301136384 |
---|---|
author | Ramakers, Bart P Riksen, Niels P van den Broek, Petra Franke, Barbara Peters, Wilbert HM van der Hoeven, Johannes G Smits, Paul Pickkers, Peter |
author_facet | Ramakers, Bart P Riksen, Niels P van den Broek, Petra Franke, Barbara Peters, Wilbert HM van der Hoeven, Johannes G Smits, Paul Pickkers, Peter |
author_sort | Ramakers, Bart P |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Preclinical studies have shown that the endogenous nucleoside adenosine prevents excessive tissue injury during systemic inflammation. We aimed to study whether endogenous adenosine also limits tissue injury in a human in vivo model of systemic inflammation. In addition, we studied whether subjects with the common 34C > T nonsense variant (rs17602729) of adenosine monophosphate deaminase (AMPD1), which predicts increased adenosine formation, have less inflammation-induced injury. METHODS: In a randomized double-blinded design, healthy male volunteers received 2 ng/kg E. Coli LPS intravenously with (n = 10) or without (n = 10) pretreatment with the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine (4 mg/kg body weight). In addition, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was administered to 10 subjects heterozygous for the AMPD1 34C > T variant. RESULTS: The increase in adenosine levels tended to be more pronounced in the subjects heterozygous for the AMPD1 34C > T variant (71 ± 22%, P=0.04), compared to placebo- (59 ± 29%, P=0.012) and caffeine-treated (53 ± 47%, P=0.29) subjects, but this difference between groups did not reach statistical significance. Also the LPS-induced increase in circulating cytokines was similar in the LPS-placebo, LPS-caffeine and LPS-AMPD1-groups. Endotoxemia resulted in an increase in circulating plasma markers of endothelial activation [intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)], and in subclinical renal injury, measured by increased urinary excretion of tubular injury markers. The LPS-induced increase of these markers did not differ between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Human experimental endotoxemia induces an increase in circulating cytokine levels and subclinical endothelial and renal injury. Although the plasma adenosine concentration is elevated during systemic inflammation, co-administration of caffeine or the presence of the 34C > T variant of AMPD1 does not affect the observed subclinical organ damage, suggesting that adenosine does not affect the inflammatory response and subclinical endothelial and renal injury during human experimental endotoxemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials (NCT): NCT00513110. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3222030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32220302011-11-22 Circulating adenosine increases during human experimental endotoxemia but blockade of its receptor does not influence the immune response and subsequent organ injury Ramakers, Bart P Riksen, Niels P van den Broek, Petra Franke, Barbara Peters, Wilbert HM van der Hoeven, Johannes G Smits, Paul Pickkers, Peter Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Preclinical studies have shown that the endogenous nucleoside adenosine prevents excessive tissue injury during systemic inflammation. We aimed to study whether endogenous adenosine also limits tissue injury in a human in vivo model of systemic inflammation. In addition, we studied whether subjects with the common 34C > T nonsense variant (rs17602729) of adenosine monophosphate deaminase (AMPD1), which predicts increased adenosine formation, have less inflammation-induced injury. METHODS: In a randomized double-blinded design, healthy male volunteers received 2 ng/kg E. Coli LPS intravenously with (n = 10) or without (n = 10) pretreatment with the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine (4 mg/kg body weight). In addition, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was administered to 10 subjects heterozygous for the AMPD1 34C > T variant. RESULTS: The increase in adenosine levels tended to be more pronounced in the subjects heterozygous for the AMPD1 34C > T variant (71 ± 22%, P=0.04), compared to placebo- (59 ± 29%, P=0.012) and caffeine-treated (53 ± 47%, P=0.29) subjects, but this difference between groups did not reach statistical significance. Also the LPS-induced increase in circulating cytokines was similar in the LPS-placebo, LPS-caffeine and LPS-AMPD1-groups. Endotoxemia resulted in an increase in circulating plasma markers of endothelial activation [intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)], and in subclinical renal injury, measured by increased urinary excretion of tubular injury markers. The LPS-induced increase of these markers did not differ between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Human experimental endotoxemia induces an increase in circulating cytokine levels and subclinical endothelial and renal injury. Although the plasma adenosine concentration is elevated during systemic inflammation, co-administration of caffeine or the presence of the 34C > T variant of AMPD1 does not affect the observed subclinical organ damage, suggesting that adenosine does not affect the inflammatory response and subclinical endothelial and renal injury during human experimental endotoxemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials (NCT): NCT00513110. BioMed Central 2011 2011-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3222030/ /pubmed/21211004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9400 Text en Copyright ©2011 Ramakers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ramakers, Bart P Riksen, Niels P van den Broek, Petra Franke, Barbara Peters, Wilbert HM van der Hoeven, Johannes G Smits, Paul Pickkers, Peter Circulating adenosine increases during human experimental endotoxemia but blockade of its receptor does not influence the immune response and subsequent organ injury |
title | Circulating adenosine increases during human experimental endotoxemia but blockade of its receptor does not influence the immune response and subsequent organ injury |
title_full | Circulating adenosine increases during human experimental endotoxemia but blockade of its receptor does not influence the immune response and subsequent organ injury |
title_fullStr | Circulating adenosine increases during human experimental endotoxemia but blockade of its receptor does not influence the immune response and subsequent organ injury |
title_full_unstemmed | Circulating adenosine increases during human experimental endotoxemia but blockade of its receptor does not influence the immune response and subsequent organ injury |
title_short | Circulating adenosine increases during human experimental endotoxemia but blockade of its receptor does not influence the immune response and subsequent organ injury |
title_sort | circulating adenosine increases during human experimental endotoxemia but blockade of its receptor does not influence the immune response and subsequent organ injury |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21211004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramakersbartp circulatingadenosineincreasesduringhumanexperimentalendotoxemiabutblockadeofitsreceptordoesnotinfluencetheimmuneresponseandsubsequentorganinjury AT riksennielsp circulatingadenosineincreasesduringhumanexperimentalendotoxemiabutblockadeofitsreceptordoesnotinfluencetheimmuneresponseandsubsequentorganinjury AT vandenbroekpetra circulatingadenosineincreasesduringhumanexperimentalendotoxemiabutblockadeofitsreceptordoesnotinfluencetheimmuneresponseandsubsequentorganinjury AT frankebarbara circulatingadenosineincreasesduringhumanexperimentalendotoxemiabutblockadeofitsreceptordoesnotinfluencetheimmuneresponseandsubsequentorganinjury AT peterswilberthm circulatingadenosineincreasesduringhumanexperimentalendotoxemiabutblockadeofitsreceptordoesnotinfluencetheimmuneresponseandsubsequentorganinjury AT vanderhoevenjohannesg circulatingadenosineincreasesduringhumanexperimentalendotoxemiabutblockadeofitsreceptordoesnotinfluencetheimmuneresponseandsubsequentorganinjury AT smitspaul circulatingadenosineincreasesduringhumanexperimentalendotoxemiabutblockadeofitsreceptordoesnotinfluencetheimmuneresponseandsubsequentorganinjury AT pickkerspeter circulatingadenosineincreasesduringhumanexperimentalendotoxemiabutblockadeofitsreceptordoesnotinfluencetheimmuneresponseandsubsequentorganinjury |