Cargando…

Fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines feasible for Africa?

In their article, Baelani and colleagues surveyed anesthesia providers from African low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to evaluate whether or not the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines are feasible in such resource-constrained settings. The authors report that an alarmingly low...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacob, Shevin T, West, T Eoin, Banura, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9981
_version_ 1782217168431087616
author Jacob, Shevin T
West, T Eoin
Banura, Patrick
author_facet Jacob, Shevin T
West, T Eoin
Banura, Patrick
author_sort Jacob, Shevin T
collection PubMed
description In their article, Baelani and colleagues surveyed anesthesia providers from African low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to evaluate whether or not the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines are feasible in such resource-constrained settings. The authors report that an alarmingly low percentage of hospitals have the capacity to implement the SSC guidelines in their entirety but a higher percentage are able to implement the majority of SSC guidelines and grade 1 recommendations. In reality, the probability of adherence to SSC guidelines for septic management is even lower than reported, given that the majority of sepsis management in African LMICs is likely performed by non-intensivists outside of intensive care units. Efforts to address the challenges of managing severely ill patients in LMICs have recently been taken on by the World Health Organization. After reviewing available evidence for sepsis management predominantly from high-income countries, a panel of experts developed a consensus-based strategy tailored for resource-limited settings. However, more research that can evaluate the challenges specific to sepsis management in LMICs and not currently addressed by the SSC guidelines is needed. Comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines combined with innovative approaches to sepsis management in LMICs are required to make a meaningful impact on worldwide sepsis survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3222070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32220702012-02-01 Fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines feasible for Africa? Jacob, Shevin T West, T Eoin Banura, Patrick Crit Care Commentary In their article, Baelani and colleagues surveyed anesthesia providers from African low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to evaluate whether or not the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines are feasible in such resource-constrained settings. The authors report that an alarmingly low percentage of hospitals have the capacity to implement the SSC guidelines in their entirety but a higher percentage are able to implement the majority of SSC guidelines and grade 1 recommendations. In reality, the probability of adherence to SSC guidelines for septic management is even lower than reported, given that the majority of sepsis management in African LMICs is likely performed by non-intensivists outside of intensive care units. Efforts to address the challenges of managing severely ill patients in LMICs have recently been taken on by the World Health Organization. After reviewing available evidence for sepsis management predominantly from high-income countries, a panel of experts developed a consensus-based strategy tailored for resource-limited settings. However, more research that can evaluate the challenges specific to sepsis management in LMICs and not currently addressed by the SSC guidelines is needed. Comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines combined with innovative approaches to sepsis management in LMICs are required to make a meaningful impact on worldwide sepsis survival. BioMed Central 2011 2011-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3222070/ /pubmed/21345262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9981 Text en Copyright ©2011 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Jacob, Shevin T
West, T Eoin
Banura, Patrick
Fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines feasible for Africa?
title Fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines feasible for Africa?
title_full Fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines feasible for Africa?
title_fullStr Fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines feasible for Africa?
title_full_unstemmed Fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines feasible for Africa?
title_short Fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines feasible for Africa?
title_sort fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current surviving sepsis campaign guidelines feasible for africa?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9981
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobshevint fittingasquarepegintoaroundholearethecurrentsurvivingsepsiscampaignguidelinesfeasibleforafrica
AT westteoin fittingasquarepegintoaroundholearethecurrentsurvivingsepsiscampaignguidelinesfeasibleforafrica
AT banurapatrick fittingasquarepegintoaroundholearethecurrentsurvivingsepsiscampaignguidelinesfeasibleforafrica