Cargando…

A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies

BACKGROUND: As the popularity of e-therapies grows, so too has the body of literature supporting their effectiveness. However, these interventions are often plagued by high attrition rates and varying levels of user adherence. Understanding the role of adherence may be crucial to understanding how p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donkin, Liesje, Christensen, Helen, Naismith, Sharon L, Neal, Bruce, Hickie, Ian B, Glozier, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21821503
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1772
_version_ 1782217175646339072
author Donkin, Liesje
Christensen, Helen
Naismith, Sharon L
Neal, Bruce
Hickie, Ian B
Glozier, Nick
author_facet Donkin, Liesje
Christensen, Helen
Naismith, Sharon L
Neal, Bruce
Hickie, Ian B
Glozier, Nick
author_sort Donkin, Liesje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As the popularity of e-therapies grows, so too has the body of literature supporting their effectiveness. However, these interventions are often plagued by high attrition rates and varying levels of user adherence. Understanding the role of adherence may be crucial to understanding how program usage influences the effectiveness of e-therapy interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically review the e-therapy literature to (1) describe the methods used to assess adherence and (2) evaluate the association of adherence with outcome of these interventions. METHODS: A systematic review of e-therapy interventions was conducted across disease states and behavioral targets. Data were collected on adherence measures, outcomes, and analyses exploring the relationship between adherence measures and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 69 studies that reported an adherence measure, only 33 (48%) examined the relationship between adherence and outcomes. The number of logins was the most commonly reported measure of adherence, followed by the number of modules completed. The heterogeneity of adherence and outcome measures limited analysis. However, logins appeared to be the measure of adherence most consistently related to outcomes in physical health interventions, while module completion was found to be most related to outcomes in psychological health interventions. CONCLUSIONS: There is large variation in the reporting of adherence and the association of adherence with outcomes. A lack of agreement about how best to measure adherence is likely to contribute to the variation in findings. Physical and psychological outcomes seem influenced by different types of adherence. A composite measure encompassing time online, activity completion, and active engagements with the intervention may be the best measure of adherence. Further research is required to establish a consensus for measuring adherence and to understand the role of adherence in influencing outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3222162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32221622011-11-22 A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies Donkin, Liesje Christensen, Helen Naismith, Sharon L Neal, Bruce Hickie, Ian B Glozier, Nick J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: As the popularity of e-therapies grows, so too has the body of literature supporting their effectiveness. However, these interventions are often plagued by high attrition rates and varying levels of user adherence. Understanding the role of adherence may be crucial to understanding how program usage influences the effectiveness of e-therapy interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically review the e-therapy literature to (1) describe the methods used to assess adherence and (2) evaluate the association of adherence with outcome of these interventions. METHODS: A systematic review of e-therapy interventions was conducted across disease states and behavioral targets. Data were collected on adherence measures, outcomes, and analyses exploring the relationship between adherence measures and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 69 studies that reported an adherence measure, only 33 (48%) examined the relationship between adherence and outcomes. The number of logins was the most commonly reported measure of adherence, followed by the number of modules completed. The heterogeneity of adherence and outcome measures limited analysis. However, logins appeared to be the measure of adherence most consistently related to outcomes in physical health interventions, while module completion was found to be most related to outcomes in psychological health interventions. CONCLUSIONS: There is large variation in the reporting of adherence and the association of adherence with outcomes. A lack of agreement about how best to measure adherence is likely to contribute to the variation in findings. Physical and psychological outcomes seem influenced by different types of adherence. A composite measure encompassing time online, activity completion, and active engagements with the intervention may be the best measure of adherence. Further research is required to establish a consensus for measuring adherence and to understand the role of adherence in influencing outcomes. Gunther Eysenbach 2011-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3222162/ /pubmed/21821503 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1772 Text en ©Liesje Donkin, Helen Christensen, Sharon L Naismith, Bruce Neal, Ian B Hickie, Nick Glozier. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 05.08.2011. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Donkin, Liesje
Christensen, Helen
Naismith, Sharon L
Neal, Bruce
Hickie, Ian B
Glozier, Nick
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies
title A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies
title_full A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies
title_short A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies
title_sort systematic review of the impact of adherence on the effectiveness of e-therapies
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21821503
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1772
work_keys_str_mv AT donkinliesje asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies
AT christensenhelen asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies
AT naismithsharonl asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies
AT nealbruce asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies
AT hickieianb asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies
AT gloziernick asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies
AT donkinliesje systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies
AT christensenhelen systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies
AT naismithsharonl systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies
AT nealbruce systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies
AT hickieianb systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies
AT gloziernick systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies