Cargando…
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies
BACKGROUND: As the popularity of e-therapies grows, so too has the body of literature supporting their effectiveness. However, these interventions are often plagued by high attrition rates and varying levels of user adherence. Understanding the role of adherence may be crucial to understanding how p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Gunther Eysenbach
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21821503 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1772 |
_version_ | 1782217175646339072 |
---|---|
author | Donkin, Liesje Christensen, Helen Naismith, Sharon L Neal, Bruce Hickie, Ian B Glozier, Nick |
author_facet | Donkin, Liesje Christensen, Helen Naismith, Sharon L Neal, Bruce Hickie, Ian B Glozier, Nick |
author_sort | Donkin, Liesje |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As the popularity of e-therapies grows, so too has the body of literature supporting their effectiveness. However, these interventions are often plagued by high attrition rates and varying levels of user adherence. Understanding the role of adherence may be crucial to understanding how program usage influences the effectiveness of e-therapy interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically review the e-therapy literature to (1) describe the methods used to assess adherence and (2) evaluate the association of adherence with outcome of these interventions. METHODS: A systematic review of e-therapy interventions was conducted across disease states and behavioral targets. Data were collected on adherence measures, outcomes, and analyses exploring the relationship between adherence measures and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 69 studies that reported an adherence measure, only 33 (48%) examined the relationship between adherence and outcomes. The number of logins was the most commonly reported measure of adherence, followed by the number of modules completed. The heterogeneity of adherence and outcome measures limited analysis. However, logins appeared to be the measure of adherence most consistently related to outcomes in physical health interventions, while module completion was found to be most related to outcomes in psychological health interventions. CONCLUSIONS: There is large variation in the reporting of adherence and the association of adherence with outcomes. A lack of agreement about how best to measure adherence is likely to contribute to the variation in findings. Physical and psychological outcomes seem influenced by different types of adherence. A composite measure encompassing time online, activity completion, and active engagements with the intervention may be the best measure of adherence. Further research is required to establish a consensus for measuring adherence and to understand the role of adherence in influencing outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3222162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Gunther Eysenbach |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32221622011-11-22 A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies Donkin, Liesje Christensen, Helen Naismith, Sharon L Neal, Bruce Hickie, Ian B Glozier, Nick J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: As the popularity of e-therapies grows, so too has the body of literature supporting their effectiveness. However, these interventions are often plagued by high attrition rates and varying levels of user adherence. Understanding the role of adherence may be crucial to understanding how program usage influences the effectiveness of e-therapy interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically review the e-therapy literature to (1) describe the methods used to assess adherence and (2) evaluate the association of adherence with outcome of these interventions. METHODS: A systematic review of e-therapy interventions was conducted across disease states and behavioral targets. Data were collected on adherence measures, outcomes, and analyses exploring the relationship between adherence measures and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 69 studies that reported an adherence measure, only 33 (48%) examined the relationship between adherence and outcomes. The number of logins was the most commonly reported measure of adherence, followed by the number of modules completed. The heterogeneity of adherence and outcome measures limited analysis. However, logins appeared to be the measure of adherence most consistently related to outcomes in physical health interventions, while module completion was found to be most related to outcomes in psychological health interventions. CONCLUSIONS: There is large variation in the reporting of adherence and the association of adherence with outcomes. A lack of agreement about how best to measure adherence is likely to contribute to the variation in findings. Physical and psychological outcomes seem influenced by different types of adherence. A composite measure encompassing time online, activity completion, and active engagements with the intervention may be the best measure of adherence. Further research is required to establish a consensus for measuring adherence and to understand the role of adherence in influencing outcomes. Gunther Eysenbach 2011-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3222162/ /pubmed/21821503 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1772 Text en ©Liesje Donkin, Helen Christensen, Sharon L Naismith, Bruce Neal, Ian B Hickie, Nick Glozier. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 05.08.2011. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Donkin, Liesje Christensen, Helen Naismith, Sharon L Neal, Bruce Hickie, Ian B Glozier, Nick A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies |
title | A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies |
title_full | A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies |
title_short | A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies |
title_sort | systematic review of the impact of adherence on the effectiveness of e-therapies |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21821503 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1772 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donkinliesje asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies AT christensenhelen asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies AT naismithsharonl asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies AT nealbruce asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies AT hickieianb asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies AT gloziernick asystematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies AT donkinliesje systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies AT christensenhelen systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies AT naismithsharonl systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies AT nealbruce systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies AT hickieianb systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies AT gloziernick systematicreviewoftheimpactofadherenceontheeffectivenessofetherapies |