Cargando…

How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During Human Decision-Making

Human decisions are based on accumulating evidence over time for different options. Here we ask a simple question: How is the accumulation of evidence affected by the level of awareness of the information? We examined the influence of awareness on decision-making using combined behavioral methods an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Lange, Floris P., van Gaal, Simon, Lamme, Victor A. F., Dehaene, Stanislas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22131904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001203
_version_ 1782217209364348928
author de Lange, Floris P.
van Gaal, Simon
Lamme, Victor A. F.
Dehaene, Stanislas
author_facet de Lange, Floris P.
van Gaal, Simon
Lamme, Victor A. F.
Dehaene, Stanislas
author_sort de Lange, Floris P.
collection PubMed
description Human decisions are based on accumulating evidence over time for different options. Here we ask a simple question: How is the accumulation of evidence affected by the level of awareness of the information? We examined the influence of awareness on decision-making using combined behavioral methods and magneto-encephalography (MEG). Participants were required to make decisions by accumulating evidence over a series of visually presented arrow stimuli whose visibility was modulated by masking. Behavioral results showed that participants could accumulate evidence under both high and low visibility. However, a top-down strategic modulation of the flow of incoming evidence was only present for stimuli with high visibility: once enough evidence had been accrued, participants strategically reduced the impact of new incoming stimuli. Also, decision-making speed and confidence were strongly modulated by the strength of the evidence for high-visible but not low-visible evidence, even though direct priming effects were identical for both types of stimuli. Neural recordings revealed that, while initial perceptual processing was independent of visibility, there was stronger top-down amplification for stimuli with high visibility than low visibility. Furthermore, neural markers of evidence accumulation over occipito-parietal cortex showed a strategic bias only for highly visible sensory information, speeding up processing and reducing neural computations related to the decision process. Our results indicate that the level of awareness of information changes decision-making: while accumulation of evidence already exists under low visibility conditions, high visibility allows evidence to be accumulated up to a higher level, leading to important strategical top-down changes in decision-making. Our results therefore suggest a potential role of awareness in deploying flexible strategies for biasing information acquisition in line with one's expectations and goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3222633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32226332011-11-30 How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During Human Decision-Making de Lange, Floris P. van Gaal, Simon Lamme, Victor A. F. Dehaene, Stanislas PLoS Biol Research Article Human decisions are based on accumulating evidence over time for different options. Here we ask a simple question: How is the accumulation of evidence affected by the level of awareness of the information? We examined the influence of awareness on decision-making using combined behavioral methods and magneto-encephalography (MEG). Participants were required to make decisions by accumulating evidence over a series of visually presented arrow stimuli whose visibility was modulated by masking. Behavioral results showed that participants could accumulate evidence under both high and low visibility. However, a top-down strategic modulation of the flow of incoming evidence was only present for stimuli with high visibility: once enough evidence had been accrued, participants strategically reduced the impact of new incoming stimuli. Also, decision-making speed and confidence were strongly modulated by the strength of the evidence for high-visible but not low-visible evidence, even though direct priming effects were identical for both types of stimuli. Neural recordings revealed that, while initial perceptual processing was independent of visibility, there was stronger top-down amplification for stimuli with high visibility than low visibility. Furthermore, neural markers of evidence accumulation over occipito-parietal cortex showed a strategic bias only for highly visible sensory information, speeding up processing and reducing neural computations related to the decision process. Our results indicate that the level of awareness of information changes decision-making: while accumulation of evidence already exists under low visibility conditions, high visibility allows evidence to be accumulated up to a higher level, leading to important strategical top-down changes in decision-making. Our results therefore suggest a potential role of awareness in deploying flexible strategies for biasing information acquisition in line with one's expectations and goals. Public Library of Science 2011-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3222633/ /pubmed/22131904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001203 Text en de Lange et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Lange, Floris P.
van Gaal, Simon
Lamme, Victor A. F.
Dehaene, Stanislas
How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During Human Decision-Making
title How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During Human Decision-Making
title_full How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During Human Decision-Making
title_fullStr How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During Human Decision-Making
title_full_unstemmed How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During Human Decision-Making
title_short How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During Human Decision-Making
title_sort how awareness changes the relative weights of evidence during human decision-making
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22131904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001203
work_keys_str_mv AT delangeflorisp howawarenesschangestherelativeweightsofevidenceduringhumandecisionmaking
AT vangaalsimon howawarenesschangestherelativeweightsofevidenceduringhumandecisionmaking
AT lammevictoraf howawarenesschangestherelativeweightsofevidenceduringhumandecisionmaking
AT dehaenestanislas howawarenesschangestherelativeweightsofevidenceduringhumandecisionmaking