Cargando…
Evaluation of High-Throughput PCR and Microarray-Based Assay in Conjunction with Automated DNA Extraction Instruments for Diagnosis of Sepsis
BACKGROUND: High incidence of septic patients increases the pressure of faster and more reliable bacterial identification methods to adapt patient management towards focused and effective treatment options. The aim of this study was to assess two automated DNA extraction solutions with the PCR and m...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22132076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026655 |
_version_ | 1782217212547825664 |
---|---|
author | Laakso, Sanna Kirveskari, Juha Tissari, Päivi Mäki, Minna |
author_facet | Laakso, Sanna Kirveskari, Juha Tissari, Päivi Mäki, Minna |
author_sort | Laakso, Sanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High incidence of septic patients increases the pressure of faster and more reliable bacterial identification methods to adapt patient management towards focused and effective treatment options. The aim of this study was to assess two automated DNA extraction solutions with the PCR and microarray-based assay to enable rapid and reliable detection and speciation of causative agents in the diagnosis of sepsis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We evaluated two automated DNA instruments NucliSENS® easyMAG® and NorDiag Arrow for the preparation of blood culture samples. A set of 91 samples flagged as positive during incubation was analyzed prospectively with the high-throughput generation of Prove-it™ Sepsis assay designed to identify over 60 Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial species as well as methicillin resistance marker from a blood culture. Bacterial findings were accurately reported from 77 blood culture samples, whereas 14 samples were reported as negative, containing bacteria not belonging to the pathogen panel of the assay. No difference was observed between the performance of NorDiag Arrow or NucliSENS® easyMAG® with regard to the result reporting of Prove-it™ Sepsis. In addition, we also assessed the quality and quantity of DNA extracted from the clinical Escherichia coli isolate with DNA extraction instruments. We observed only minor differences between the two instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Use of automated and standardized sample preparation methods together with rapid, multiplex pathogen detection offers a strategy to speed up reliably the diagnostics of septic patients. Both tested DNA extraction devices were shown to be feasible for blood culture samples and the Prove-it™ Sepsis assay, providing an accurate identification of pathogen within 4,5 hours when the detected pathogen was in the repertoire of the test. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3222647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32226472011-11-30 Evaluation of High-Throughput PCR and Microarray-Based Assay in Conjunction with Automated DNA Extraction Instruments for Diagnosis of Sepsis Laakso, Sanna Kirveskari, Juha Tissari, Päivi Mäki, Minna PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: High incidence of septic patients increases the pressure of faster and more reliable bacterial identification methods to adapt patient management towards focused and effective treatment options. The aim of this study was to assess two automated DNA extraction solutions with the PCR and microarray-based assay to enable rapid and reliable detection and speciation of causative agents in the diagnosis of sepsis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We evaluated two automated DNA instruments NucliSENS® easyMAG® and NorDiag Arrow for the preparation of blood culture samples. A set of 91 samples flagged as positive during incubation was analyzed prospectively with the high-throughput generation of Prove-it™ Sepsis assay designed to identify over 60 Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial species as well as methicillin resistance marker from a blood culture. Bacterial findings were accurately reported from 77 blood culture samples, whereas 14 samples were reported as negative, containing bacteria not belonging to the pathogen panel of the assay. No difference was observed between the performance of NorDiag Arrow or NucliSENS® easyMAG® with regard to the result reporting of Prove-it™ Sepsis. In addition, we also assessed the quality and quantity of DNA extracted from the clinical Escherichia coli isolate with DNA extraction instruments. We observed only minor differences between the two instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Use of automated and standardized sample preparation methods together with rapid, multiplex pathogen detection offers a strategy to speed up reliably the diagnostics of septic patients. Both tested DNA extraction devices were shown to be feasible for blood culture samples and the Prove-it™ Sepsis assay, providing an accurate identification of pathogen within 4,5 hours when the detected pathogen was in the repertoire of the test. Public Library of Science 2011-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3222647/ /pubmed/22132076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026655 Text en Laakso et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Laakso, Sanna Kirveskari, Juha Tissari, Päivi Mäki, Minna Evaluation of High-Throughput PCR and Microarray-Based Assay in Conjunction with Automated DNA Extraction Instruments for Diagnosis of Sepsis |
title | Evaluation of High-Throughput PCR and Microarray-Based Assay in Conjunction with Automated DNA Extraction Instruments for Diagnosis of Sepsis |
title_full | Evaluation of High-Throughput PCR and Microarray-Based Assay in Conjunction with Automated DNA Extraction Instruments for Diagnosis of Sepsis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of High-Throughput PCR and Microarray-Based Assay in Conjunction with Automated DNA Extraction Instruments for Diagnosis of Sepsis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of High-Throughput PCR and Microarray-Based Assay in Conjunction with Automated DNA Extraction Instruments for Diagnosis of Sepsis |
title_short | Evaluation of High-Throughput PCR and Microarray-Based Assay in Conjunction with Automated DNA Extraction Instruments for Diagnosis of Sepsis |
title_sort | evaluation of high-throughput pcr and microarray-based assay in conjunction with automated dna extraction instruments for diagnosis of sepsis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22132076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026655 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laaksosanna evaluationofhighthroughputpcrandmicroarraybasedassayinconjunctionwithautomateddnaextractioninstrumentsfordiagnosisofsepsis AT kirveskarijuha evaluationofhighthroughputpcrandmicroarraybasedassayinconjunctionwithautomateddnaextractioninstrumentsfordiagnosisofsepsis AT tissaripaivi evaluationofhighthroughputpcrandmicroarraybasedassayinconjunctionwithautomateddnaextractioninstrumentsfordiagnosisofsepsis AT makiminna evaluationofhighthroughputpcrandmicroarraybasedassayinconjunctionwithautomateddnaextractioninstrumentsfordiagnosisofsepsis |