Cargando…

Antegrade pressure measurement as a diagnostic tool in modern pediatric urology

INTRODUCTION: The antegrade pressure measurement (APM) or perfusion pressure-flow test (Whitaker test) is a method of antegrade measurement of pressure in the upper urinary tract. In this study, we present the long-term follow-up results of APMs performed in our institution in the late 1980s and ear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veenboer, Paul W., de Jong, Tom P. V. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3223354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21681523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0717-9
_version_ 1782217285120819200
author Veenboer, Paul W.
de Jong, Tom P. V. M.
author_facet Veenboer, Paul W.
de Jong, Tom P. V. M.
author_sort Veenboer, Paul W.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The antegrade pressure measurement (APM) or perfusion pressure-flow test (Whitaker test) is a method of antegrade measurement of pressure in the upper urinary tract. In this study, we present the long-term follow-up results of APMs performed in our institution in the late 1980s and early 1990s to see whether the diagnostic decisions that were based on the outcomes of the test prove to be correct in the long term. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study by searching our hospital’s electronic database. We found a total of 16 APMs performed between 1987 and 1995 (10 boys, six girls; mean age 61 months). RESULTS: In nine cases, action was undertaken immediately after the APM had been performed; in seven cases, this was a surgical procedure (re-implantation/re-calibration or pyeloplasty) after obstruction was demonstrated. In two cases (both postoperative after previous pyeloplasty), absence of obstruction was demonstrated and nephrostomy tubes were subsequently closed. In one case, this resulted in hydronephrosis that had to be treated with a new JJ stent. In all the seven cases in which no action was deemed necessary as a result of the outcome of the APM, long-term follow-up showed that intervention had indeed not been necessary. CONCLUSION: Although not often used anymore, the APM seems to be a safe and valuable diagnostic tool in the work up for possible urinary tract obstruction in children, especially in cases in which there is serious doubt concerning conservative watchful waiting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3223354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32233542011-12-27 Antegrade pressure measurement as a diagnostic tool in modern pediatric urology Veenboer, Paul W. de Jong, Tom P. V. M. World J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The antegrade pressure measurement (APM) or perfusion pressure-flow test (Whitaker test) is a method of antegrade measurement of pressure in the upper urinary tract. In this study, we present the long-term follow-up results of APMs performed in our institution in the late 1980s and early 1990s to see whether the diagnostic decisions that were based on the outcomes of the test prove to be correct in the long term. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study by searching our hospital’s electronic database. We found a total of 16 APMs performed between 1987 and 1995 (10 boys, six girls; mean age 61 months). RESULTS: In nine cases, action was undertaken immediately after the APM had been performed; in seven cases, this was a surgical procedure (re-implantation/re-calibration or pyeloplasty) after obstruction was demonstrated. In two cases (both postoperative after previous pyeloplasty), absence of obstruction was demonstrated and nephrostomy tubes were subsequently closed. In one case, this resulted in hydronephrosis that had to be treated with a new JJ stent. In all the seven cases in which no action was deemed necessary as a result of the outcome of the APM, long-term follow-up showed that intervention had indeed not been necessary. CONCLUSION: Although not often used anymore, the APM seems to be a safe and valuable diagnostic tool in the work up for possible urinary tract obstruction in children, especially in cases in which there is serious doubt concerning conservative watchful waiting. Springer-Verlag 2011-06-17 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3223354/ /pubmed/21681523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0717-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Veenboer, Paul W.
de Jong, Tom P. V. M.
Antegrade pressure measurement as a diagnostic tool in modern pediatric urology
title Antegrade pressure measurement as a diagnostic tool in modern pediatric urology
title_full Antegrade pressure measurement as a diagnostic tool in modern pediatric urology
title_fullStr Antegrade pressure measurement as a diagnostic tool in modern pediatric urology
title_full_unstemmed Antegrade pressure measurement as a diagnostic tool in modern pediatric urology
title_short Antegrade pressure measurement as a diagnostic tool in modern pediatric urology
title_sort antegrade pressure measurement as a diagnostic tool in modern pediatric urology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3223354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21681523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0717-9
work_keys_str_mv AT veenboerpaulw antegradepressuremeasurementasadiagnostictoolinmodernpediatricurology
AT dejongtompvm antegradepressuremeasurementasadiagnostictoolinmodernpediatricurology