Cargando…

Has the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’ in the UK led to an earlier diagnosis of urological malignancy?

INTRODUCTION: The ‘2 week wait’ target for haematuria assessment has been recommended for early diagnosis of urological cancer. We compare our cancer detection rates pre- and post-introduction of this target and its impact on stage at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,740 patients were e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasdev, N, Thorpe, AC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3223942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22276058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2011.215
_version_ 1782217322061103104
author Vasdev, N
Thorpe, AC
author_facet Vasdev, N
Thorpe, AC
author_sort Vasdev, N
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The ‘2 week wait’ target for haematuria assessment has been recommended for early diagnosis of urological cancer. We compare our cancer detection rates pre- and post-introduction of this target and its impact on stage at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,740 patients were enrolled prospectively in the study at our units ‘one stop fast track haematuria clinic’ between April 2003 and March 2006. Evaluation consisted of basic demographics, history and examination, routine blood tests, urinalysis, urine culture and urine cytology. All patients underwent a renal ultrasound, IVU (intravenous urogram) and flexible cystoscopy. The detection rate of urological malignancy was compared to a previous cohort at our institution (April 1994 to March 1997). RESULTS: A total of 1,067 males and 673 females with a mean age of 60.8 years (range 16–96) were included in the study. The overall cancer detection rate was 18%. With the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’ referrals, we noted a 57% increase in the detection of urological malignancies while comparing previous published data from our institution. There was no statistical significance in stage at presentation following the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’. CONCLUSION: Patients with haematuria need to be investigated promptly. The ‘2 week rule’ has increased the cancer detection rate in our institution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3223942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32239422012-01-24 Has the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’ in the UK led to an earlier diagnosis of urological malignancy? Vasdev, N Thorpe, AC Ecancermedicalscience Research Article INTRODUCTION: The ‘2 week wait’ target for haematuria assessment has been recommended for early diagnosis of urological cancer. We compare our cancer detection rates pre- and post-introduction of this target and its impact on stage at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,740 patients were enrolled prospectively in the study at our units ‘one stop fast track haematuria clinic’ between April 2003 and March 2006. Evaluation consisted of basic demographics, history and examination, routine blood tests, urinalysis, urine culture and urine cytology. All patients underwent a renal ultrasound, IVU (intravenous urogram) and flexible cystoscopy. The detection rate of urological malignancy was compared to a previous cohort at our institution (April 1994 to March 1997). RESULTS: A total of 1,067 males and 673 females with a mean age of 60.8 years (range 16–96) were included in the study. The overall cancer detection rate was 18%. With the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’ referrals, we noted a 57% increase in the detection of urological malignancies while comparing previous published data from our institution. There was no statistical significance in stage at presentation following the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’. CONCLUSION: Patients with haematuria need to be investigated promptly. The ‘2 week rule’ has increased the cancer detection rate in our institution. Cancer Intelligence 2011-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3223942/ /pubmed/22276058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2011.215 Text en Copyright: © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vasdev, N
Thorpe, AC
Has the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’ in the UK led to an earlier diagnosis of urological malignancy?
title Has the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’ in the UK led to an earlier diagnosis of urological malignancy?
title_full Has the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’ in the UK led to an earlier diagnosis of urological malignancy?
title_fullStr Has the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’ in the UK led to an earlier diagnosis of urological malignancy?
title_full_unstemmed Has the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’ in the UK led to an earlier diagnosis of urological malignancy?
title_short Has the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’ in the UK led to an earlier diagnosis of urological malignancy?
title_sort has the introduction of the ‘2 week rule’ in the uk led to an earlier diagnosis of urological malignancy?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3223942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22276058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2011.215
work_keys_str_mv AT vasdevn hastheintroductionofthe2weekruleintheukledtoanearlierdiagnosisofurologicalmalignancy
AT thorpeac hastheintroductionofthe2weekruleintheukledtoanearlierdiagnosisofurologicalmalignancy