Cargando…

The effect of measurement error of phenotypes on genome wide association studies

BACKGROUND: There is an unspoken assumption that imprecision of measurement of phenotypes will not have large systematic effects on the location of significant associations in a genome wide association study (GWAS). In this report, the effects of two independent measurements of the same trait, subcu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Barendse, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21569388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-232
_version_ 1782217349819006976
author Barendse, William
author_facet Barendse, William
author_sort Barendse, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an unspoken assumption that imprecision of measurement of phenotypes will not have large systematic effects on the location of significant associations in a genome wide association study (GWAS). In this report, the effects of two independent measurements of the same trait, subcutaneous fat thickness, were examined in GWAS of 940 individuals. RESULTS: The trait values obtained by two independent groups working to the same trait definition were correlated with r = 0.72. The allele effects obtained from the two analyses were only moderately correlated, with r = 0.53, and there was one significant (P < 0.0001) association in common to the two measurements. The correlation between allele effects was approximately equal to the square of the correlation between the trait measurements. An important quantitative trait locus (QTL) on BTA14 appeared to be shifted distally by 1 Mb along the chromosome. The divergence in GWAS was stronger with data coded into two discrete classes. Univariate trimming of the top and bottom 5% of data, a method used to control for erroneous trait values, decreased the similarity between the GWAS and increased the apparent shift of the QTL on BTA14. Stringent bivariate trimming of data, using only trait values that were similar to each other in the two data sets, substantially improved the correlation of trait values and allele effects in the GWAS, and showed evidence for two QTL on BTA14 separated by 1 Mb. Despite the reduction in sample size due to trimming, more SNP were significant. Using the mean of the two measurements of the trait was not as efficient as bivariate trimming. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that trait values in GWAS experiments be examined for repeatability before the experiment is performed. For traits that do not have high repeatability (r < 0.95), two or more independent measurements of the same trait should be obtained for all samples, and individuals genotyped that have highly correlated trait measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3224145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32241452011-11-27 The effect of measurement error of phenotypes on genome wide association studies Barendse, William BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: There is an unspoken assumption that imprecision of measurement of phenotypes will not have large systematic effects on the location of significant associations in a genome wide association study (GWAS). In this report, the effects of two independent measurements of the same trait, subcutaneous fat thickness, were examined in GWAS of 940 individuals. RESULTS: The trait values obtained by two independent groups working to the same trait definition were correlated with r = 0.72. The allele effects obtained from the two analyses were only moderately correlated, with r = 0.53, and there was one significant (P < 0.0001) association in common to the two measurements. The correlation between allele effects was approximately equal to the square of the correlation between the trait measurements. An important quantitative trait locus (QTL) on BTA14 appeared to be shifted distally by 1 Mb along the chromosome. The divergence in GWAS was stronger with data coded into two discrete classes. Univariate trimming of the top and bottom 5% of data, a method used to control for erroneous trait values, decreased the similarity between the GWAS and increased the apparent shift of the QTL on BTA14. Stringent bivariate trimming of data, using only trait values that were similar to each other in the two data sets, substantially improved the correlation of trait values and allele effects in the GWAS, and showed evidence for two QTL on BTA14 separated by 1 Mb. Despite the reduction in sample size due to trimming, more SNP were significant. Using the mean of the two measurements of the trait was not as efficient as bivariate trimming. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that trait values in GWAS experiments be examined for repeatability before the experiment is performed. For traits that do not have high repeatability (r < 0.95), two or more independent measurements of the same trait should be obtained for all samples, and individuals genotyped that have highly correlated trait measurements. BioMed Central 2011-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3224145/ /pubmed/21569388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-232 Text en Copyright ©2011 Barendse; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barendse, William
The effect of measurement error of phenotypes on genome wide association studies
title The effect of measurement error of phenotypes on genome wide association studies
title_full The effect of measurement error of phenotypes on genome wide association studies
title_fullStr The effect of measurement error of phenotypes on genome wide association studies
title_full_unstemmed The effect of measurement error of phenotypes on genome wide association studies
title_short The effect of measurement error of phenotypes on genome wide association studies
title_sort effect of measurement error of phenotypes on genome wide association studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21569388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-232
work_keys_str_mv AT barendsewilliam theeffectofmeasurementerrorofphenotypesongenomewideassociationstudies
AT barendsewilliam effectofmeasurementerrorofphenotypesongenomewideassociationstudies