Cargando…
Physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the ICU clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice?
Critically ill patients are highly variable in their response to care and treatment. This variability and the search for improved outcomes have led to a significant increase in the use of protocolized care to reduce variability in care. However, protocolized care does not address the variability of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21906337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-11 |
_version_ | 1782217389416382464 |
---|---|
author | Chase, J Geoffrey Le Compte, Aaron J Preiser, J-C Shaw, Geoffrey M Penning, Sophie Desaive, Thomas |
author_facet | Chase, J Geoffrey Le Compte, Aaron J Preiser, J-C Shaw, Geoffrey M Penning, Sophie Desaive, Thomas |
author_sort | Chase, J Geoffrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | Critically ill patients are highly variable in their response to care and treatment. This variability and the search for improved outcomes have led to a significant increase in the use of protocolized care to reduce variability in care. However, protocolized care does not address the variability of outcome due to inter- and intra-patient variability, both in physiological state, and the response to disease and treatment. This lack of patient-specificity defines the opportunity for patient-specific approaches to diagnosis, care, and patient management, which are complementary to, and fit within, protocolized approaches. Computational models of human physiology offer the potential, with clinical data, to create patient-specific models that capture a patient's physiological status. Such models can provide new insights into patient condition by turning a series of sometimes confusing clinical data into a clear physiological picture. More directly, they can track patient-specific conditions and thus provide new means of diagnosis and opportunities for optimising therapy. This article presents the concept of model-based therapeutics, the use of computational models in clinical medicine and critical care in specific, as well as its potential clinical advantages, in a format designed for the clinical perspective. The review is presented in terms of a series of questions and answers. These aspects directly address questions concerning what makes a model, how it is made patient-specific, what it can be used for, its limitations and, importantly, what constitutes sufficient validation. To provide a concrete foundation, the concepts are presented broadly, but the details are given in terms of a specific case example. Specifically, tight glycemic control (TGC) is an area where inter- and intra-patient variability can dominate the quality of care control and care received from any given protocol. The overall review clearly shows the concept and significant clinical potential of using computational models in critical care medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3224460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32244602011-12-16 Physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the ICU clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice? Chase, J Geoffrey Le Compte, Aaron J Preiser, J-C Shaw, Geoffrey M Penning, Sophie Desaive, Thomas Ann Intensive Care Review Critically ill patients are highly variable in their response to care and treatment. This variability and the search for improved outcomes have led to a significant increase in the use of protocolized care to reduce variability in care. However, protocolized care does not address the variability of outcome due to inter- and intra-patient variability, both in physiological state, and the response to disease and treatment. This lack of patient-specificity defines the opportunity for patient-specific approaches to diagnosis, care, and patient management, which are complementary to, and fit within, protocolized approaches. Computational models of human physiology offer the potential, with clinical data, to create patient-specific models that capture a patient's physiological status. Such models can provide new insights into patient condition by turning a series of sometimes confusing clinical data into a clear physiological picture. More directly, they can track patient-specific conditions and thus provide new means of diagnosis and opportunities for optimising therapy. This article presents the concept of model-based therapeutics, the use of computational models in clinical medicine and critical care in specific, as well as its potential clinical advantages, in a format designed for the clinical perspective. The review is presented in terms of a series of questions and answers. These aspects directly address questions concerning what makes a model, how it is made patient-specific, what it can be used for, its limitations and, importantly, what constitutes sufficient validation. To provide a concrete foundation, the concepts are presented broadly, but the details are given in terms of a specific case example. Specifically, tight glycemic control (TGC) is an area where inter- and intra-patient variability can dominate the quality of care control and care received from any given protocol. The overall review clearly shows the concept and significant clinical potential of using computational models in critical care medicine. Springer 2011-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3224460/ /pubmed/21906337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-11 Text en Copyright ©2011 Chase et al; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Chase, J Geoffrey Le Compte, Aaron J Preiser, J-C Shaw, Geoffrey M Penning, Sophie Desaive, Thomas Physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the ICU clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice? |
title | Physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the ICU clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice? |
title_full | Physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the ICU clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice? |
title_fullStr | Physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the ICU clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice? |
title_full_unstemmed | Physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the ICU clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice? |
title_short | Physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the ICU clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice? |
title_sort | physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the icu clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21906337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-11 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chasejgeoffrey physiologicalmodelingtightglycemiccontrolandtheicuclinicianwhataremodelsandhowcantheyaffectpractice AT lecompteaaronj physiologicalmodelingtightglycemiccontrolandtheicuclinicianwhataremodelsandhowcantheyaffectpractice AT preiserjc physiologicalmodelingtightglycemiccontrolandtheicuclinicianwhataremodelsandhowcantheyaffectpractice AT shawgeoffreym physiologicalmodelingtightglycemiccontrolandtheicuclinicianwhataremodelsandhowcantheyaffectpractice AT penningsophie physiologicalmodelingtightglycemiccontrolandtheicuclinicianwhataremodelsandhowcantheyaffectpractice AT desaivethomas physiologicalmodelingtightglycemiccontrolandtheicuclinicianwhataremodelsandhowcantheyaffectpractice |