Diabetes care: reasons for missing HbA(1c )measurements in general practice

BACKGROUND: Glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) is often used as one of the indicators to measure the quality of diabetes care. Complete registration is difficult to obtain. This study investigated the reasons for missing HbA(1c )measurements. FINDINGS: HbA(1c )measurements for 1485 patients with diabete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keuken, Debby G, Brouwer, Henk J, Keijser, Parad S, Bruessing, Raynold C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Short Report
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21756301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-234
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) is often used as one of the indicators to measure the quality of diabetes care. Complete registration is difficult to obtain. This study investigated the reasons for missing HbA(1c )measurements. FINDINGS: HbA(1c )measurements for 1485 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 who were attended by 19 general practitioners at 4 primary care health centres in south-east Amsterdam were studied. HbA(1c )measurements were missing for 356 (23.9%) of the patients. The main reason stated in 50% of the cases was that the patient was under specialized care. CONCLUSIONS: The general practitioners provided multiple reasons for the missing HbA(1c )measurements. This study provides insight into why HbA(1c )measurements were not present in the patients' electronic medical record.

Ejemplares similares