Cargando…

SULFs in human neoplasia: implication as progression and prognosis factors

BACKGROUND: The sulfation pattern of heparan sulfate chains influences signaling events mediated by heparan sulfate proteoglycans located on cell surface. SULF1 and SULF2 are two endosulfatases able to cleave specific 6-O sulfate groups within the heparan chains. Their action can modulate signaling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bret, Caroline, Moreaux, Jérôme, Schved, Jean-François, Hose, Dirk, Klein, Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21599997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-72
_version_ 1782217409607761920
author Bret, Caroline
Moreaux, Jérôme
Schved, Jean-François
Hose, Dirk
Klein, Bernard
author_facet Bret, Caroline
Moreaux, Jérôme
Schved, Jean-François
Hose, Dirk
Klein, Bernard
author_sort Bret, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The sulfation pattern of heparan sulfate chains influences signaling events mediated by heparan sulfate proteoglycans located on cell surface. SULF1 and SULF2 are two endosulfatases able to cleave specific 6-O sulfate groups within the heparan chains. Their action can modulate signaling processes, many of which with key relevance for cancer development and expansion. SULF1 has been associated with tumor suppressor effects in various models of cancer, whereas SULF2 dysregulation was in relation with protumorigenic actions. However, other observations argue for contradictory effects of these sulfatases in cancer, suggesting the complexity of their action in the tumor microenvironment. METHODS: We compared the expression of the genes encoding SULF1, SULF2 and heparan sulfate proteoglycans in a large panel of cancer samples to their normal tissue counterparts using publicly available gene expression data, including the data obtained from two cohorts of newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, the Oncomine Cancer Microarray database, the Amazonia data base and the ITTACA database. We also analysed prognosis data in relation with these databases. RESULTS: We demonstrated that SULF2 expression in primary multiple myeloma cells was associated with a poor prognosis in two independent large cohorts of patients. It remained an independent predictor when considered together with conventional multiple myeloma prognosis factors. Besides, we observed an over-representation of SULF2 gene expression in skin cancer, colorectal carcinoma, testicular teratoma and liver cancer compared to their normal tissue counterpart. We found that SULF2 was significantly over-expressed in high grade uveal melanoma compared to low grade and in patients presenting colorectal carcinoma compared to benign colon adenoma. We observed that, in addition to previous observations, SULF1 gene expression was increased in T prolymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia and in renal carcinoma compared to corresponding normal tissues. Furthermore, we found that high SULF1 expression was associated with a poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. Finally, SULF1 and SULF2 were simultaneously overexpressed in 6 cancer types: brain, breast, head and neck, renal, skin and testicular cancers. CONCLUSIONS: SULF1 and SULF2 are overexpressed in various human cancer types and can be associated to progression and prognosis. Targeting SULF1 and/or SULF2 could be interesting strategies to develop novel cancer therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3224561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32245612011-11-27 SULFs in human neoplasia: implication as progression and prognosis factors Bret, Caroline Moreaux, Jérôme Schved, Jean-François Hose, Dirk Klein, Bernard J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: The sulfation pattern of heparan sulfate chains influences signaling events mediated by heparan sulfate proteoglycans located on cell surface. SULF1 and SULF2 are two endosulfatases able to cleave specific 6-O sulfate groups within the heparan chains. Their action can modulate signaling processes, many of which with key relevance for cancer development and expansion. SULF1 has been associated with tumor suppressor effects in various models of cancer, whereas SULF2 dysregulation was in relation with protumorigenic actions. However, other observations argue for contradictory effects of these sulfatases in cancer, suggesting the complexity of their action in the tumor microenvironment. METHODS: We compared the expression of the genes encoding SULF1, SULF2 and heparan sulfate proteoglycans in a large panel of cancer samples to their normal tissue counterparts using publicly available gene expression data, including the data obtained from two cohorts of newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, the Oncomine Cancer Microarray database, the Amazonia data base and the ITTACA database. We also analysed prognosis data in relation with these databases. RESULTS: We demonstrated that SULF2 expression in primary multiple myeloma cells was associated with a poor prognosis in two independent large cohorts of patients. It remained an independent predictor when considered together with conventional multiple myeloma prognosis factors. Besides, we observed an over-representation of SULF2 gene expression in skin cancer, colorectal carcinoma, testicular teratoma and liver cancer compared to their normal tissue counterpart. We found that SULF2 was significantly over-expressed in high grade uveal melanoma compared to low grade and in patients presenting colorectal carcinoma compared to benign colon adenoma. We observed that, in addition to previous observations, SULF1 gene expression was increased in T prolymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia and in renal carcinoma compared to corresponding normal tissues. Furthermore, we found that high SULF1 expression was associated with a poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. Finally, SULF1 and SULF2 were simultaneously overexpressed in 6 cancer types: brain, breast, head and neck, renal, skin and testicular cancers. CONCLUSIONS: SULF1 and SULF2 are overexpressed in various human cancer types and can be associated to progression and prognosis. Targeting SULF1 and/or SULF2 could be interesting strategies to develop novel cancer therapies. BioMed Central 2011-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3224561/ /pubmed/21599997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-72 Text en Copyright ©2011 Bret et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bret, Caroline
Moreaux, Jérôme
Schved, Jean-François
Hose, Dirk
Klein, Bernard
SULFs in human neoplasia: implication as progression and prognosis factors
title SULFs in human neoplasia: implication as progression and prognosis factors
title_full SULFs in human neoplasia: implication as progression and prognosis factors
title_fullStr SULFs in human neoplasia: implication as progression and prognosis factors
title_full_unstemmed SULFs in human neoplasia: implication as progression and prognosis factors
title_short SULFs in human neoplasia: implication as progression and prognosis factors
title_sort sulfs in human neoplasia: implication as progression and prognosis factors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21599997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-72
work_keys_str_mv AT bretcaroline sulfsinhumanneoplasiaimplicationasprogressionandprognosisfactors
AT moreauxjerome sulfsinhumanneoplasiaimplicationasprogressionandprognosisfactors
AT schvedjeanfrancois sulfsinhumanneoplasiaimplicationasprogressionandprognosisfactors
AT hosedirk sulfsinhumanneoplasiaimplicationasprogressionandprognosisfactors
AT kleinbernard sulfsinhumanneoplasiaimplicationasprogressionandprognosisfactors