Cargando…

Neighborhood sampling: how many streets must an auditor walk?

This study tested the representativeness of four street segment sampling protocols using the Pedestrian Environment Data Scan (PEDS) in eleven neighborhoods surrounding public housing developments in Houston, TX. The following four street segment sampling protocols were used (1) all segments, both r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMillan, Tracy E, Cubbin, Catherine, Parmenter, Barbara, Medina, Ashley V, Lee, Rebecca E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20226052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-20
_version_ 1782217457548656640
author McMillan, Tracy E
Cubbin, Catherine
Parmenter, Barbara
Medina, Ashley V
Lee, Rebecca E
author_facet McMillan, Tracy E
Cubbin, Catherine
Parmenter, Barbara
Medina, Ashley V
Lee, Rebecca E
author_sort McMillan, Tracy E
collection PubMed
description This study tested the representativeness of four street segment sampling protocols using the Pedestrian Environment Data Scan (PEDS) in eleven neighborhoods surrounding public housing developments in Houston, TX. The following four street segment sampling protocols were used (1) all segments, both residential and arterial, contained within the 400 meter radius buffer from the center point of the housing development (the core) were compared with all segments contained between the 400 meter radius buffer and the 800 meter radius buffer (the ring); all residential segments in the core were compared with (2) 75% (3) 50% and (4) 25% samples of randomly selected residential street segments in the core. Analyses were conducted on five key variables: sidewalk presence; ratings of attractiveness and safety for walking; connectivity; and number of traffic lanes. Some differences were found when comparing all street segments, both residential and arterial, in the core to the ring. Findings suggested that sampling 25% of residential street segments within the 400 m radius of a residence sufficiently represents the pedestrian built environment. Conclusions support more cost effective environmental data collection for physical activity research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3224902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32249022011-11-29 Neighborhood sampling: how many streets must an auditor walk? McMillan, Tracy E Cubbin, Catherine Parmenter, Barbara Medina, Ashley V Lee, Rebecca E Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Short Paper This study tested the representativeness of four street segment sampling protocols using the Pedestrian Environment Data Scan (PEDS) in eleven neighborhoods surrounding public housing developments in Houston, TX. The following four street segment sampling protocols were used (1) all segments, both residential and arterial, contained within the 400 meter radius buffer from the center point of the housing development (the core) were compared with all segments contained between the 400 meter radius buffer and the 800 meter radius buffer (the ring); all residential segments in the core were compared with (2) 75% (3) 50% and (4) 25% samples of randomly selected residential street segments in the core. Analyses were conducted on five key variables: sidewalk presence; ratings of attractiveness and safety for walking; connectivity; and number of traffic lanes. Some differences were found when comparing all street segments, both residential and arterial, in the core to the ring. Findings suggested that sampling 25% of residential street segments within the 400 m radius of a residence sufficiently represents the pedestrian built environment. Conclusions support more cost effective environmental data collection for physical activity research. BioMed Central 2010-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3224902/ /pubmed/20226052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-20 Text en Copyright ©2010 McMillan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Paper
McMillan, Tracy E
Cubbin, Catherine
Parmenter, Barbara
Medina, Ashley V
Lee, Rebecca E
Neighborhood sampling: how many streets must an auditor walk?
title Neighborhood sampling: how many streets must an auditor walk?
title_full Neighborhood sampling: how many streets must an auditor walk?
title_fullStr Neighborhood sampling: how many streets must an auditor walk?
title_full_unstemmed Neighborhood sampling: how many streets must an auditor walk?
title_short Neighborhood sampling: how many streets must an auditor walk?
title_sort neighborhood sampling: how many streets must an auditor walk?
topic Short Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20226052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-20
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmillantracye neighborhoodsamplinghowmanystreetsmustanauditorwalk
AT cubbincatherine neighborhoodsamplinghowmanystreetsmustanauditorwalk
AT parmenterbarbara neighborhoodsamplinghowmanystreetsmustanauditorwalk
AT medinaashleyv neighborhoodsamplinghowmanystreetsmustanauditorwalk
AT leerebeccae neighborhoodsamplinghowmanystreetsmustanauditorwalk