Cargando…

Process description and evaluation of Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines development

BACKGROUND: This paper describes the process used to arrive at recommended physical activity guidelines for Canadian school-aged children and youth (5-17 years), adults (18-64 years) and older adults (≥65 years). METHODS: The Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) Physical Activity Measurem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tremblay, Mark S, Kho, Michelle E, Tricco, Andrea C, Duggan, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20459786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-42
_version_ 1782217458232328192
author Tremblay, Mark S
Kho, Michelle E
Tricco, Andrea C
Duggan, Mary
author_facet Tremblay, Mark S
Kho, Michelle E
Tricco, Andrea C
Duggan, Mary
author_sort Tremblay, Mark S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper describes the process used to arrive at recommended physical activity guidelines for Canadian school-aged children and youth (5-17 years), adults (18-64 years) and older adults (≥65 years). METHODS: The Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) Physical Activity Measurement and Guidelines (PAMG) Steering Committee used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation (AGREE II) Instrument to inform the guideline development process. Fourteen background papers and five systematic reviews were completed. Systematic review authors appraised and synthesized the data, and proposed specific recommendations at an international consensus conference of invited experts and key stakeholders. Independently, an international panel of experts interpreted the evidence from the systematic reviews and developed recommendations following attendance at the Consensus Conference. RESULTS: Using the AGREE II instrument as a guide, specific foci for each of the guidelines were defined and systematic review methodology was used to synthesize the evidence base. The expert panel, CSEP PAMG Steering Committee and methodological consultants reviewed the systematic reviews and Consensus Statement. The expert panel achieved consensus on the level of evidence informing the physical activity guidelines and developed a separate document outlining key recommendations, interpretation of the evidence and justification of each recommendation. CONCLUSION: The CSEP and Public Health Agency of Canada followed a rigorous process to examine the evidence informing potential revisions to existing physical activity guidelines for Canadians. It is believed that this is the first physical activity guideline development process in the world to be guided and assessed by AGREE II and AMSTAR instruments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3224908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32249082011-11-29 Process description and evaluation of Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines development Tremblay, Mark S Kho, Michelle E Tricco, Andrea C Duggan, Mary Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Methodology BACKGROUND: This paper describes the process used to arrive at recommended physical activity guidelines for Canadian school-aged children and youth (5-17 years), adults (18-64 years) and older adults (≥65 years). METHODS: The Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) Physical Activity Measurement and Guidelines (PAMG) Steering Committee used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation (AGREE II) Instrument to inform the guideline development process. Fourteen background papers and five systematic reviews were completed. Systematic review authors appraised and synthesized the data, and proposed specific recommendations at an international consensus conference of invited experts and key stakeholders. Independently, an international panel of experts interpreted the evidence from the systematic reviews and developed recommendations following attendance at the Consensus Conference. RESULTS: Using the AGREE II instrument as a guide, specific foci for each of the guidelines were defined and systematic review methodology was used to synthesize the evidence base. The expert panel, CSEP PAMG Steering Committee and methodological consultants reviewed the systematic reviews and Consensus Statement. The expert panel achieved consensus on the level of evidence informing the physical activity guidelines and developed a separate document outlining key recommendations, interpretation of the evidence and justification of each recommendation. CONCLUSION: The CSEP and Public Health Agency of Canada followed a rigorous process to examine the evidence informing potential revisions to existing physical activity guidelines for Canadians. It is believed that this is the first physical activity guideline development process in the world to be guided and assessed by AGREE II and AMSTAR instruments. BioMed Central 2010-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3224908/ /pubmed/20459786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-42 Text en Copyright ©2010 Tremblay et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Tremblay, Mark S
Kho, Michelle E
Tricco, Andrea C
Duggan, Mary
Process description and evaluation of Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines development
title Process description and evaluation of Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines development
title_full Process description and evaluation of Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines development
title_fullStr Process description and evaluation of Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines development
title_full_unstemmed Process description and evaluation of Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines development
title_short Process description and evaluation of Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines development
title_sort process description and evaluation of canadian physical activity guidelines development
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20459786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-42
work_keys_str_mv AT tremblaymarks processdescriptionandevaluationofcanadianphysicalactivityguidelinesdevelopment
AT khomichellee processdescriptionandevaluationofcanadianphysicalactivityguidelinesdevelopment
AT triccoandreac processdescriptionandevaluationofcanadianphysicalactivityguidelinesdevelopment
AT dugganmary processdescriptionandevaluationofcanadianphysicalactivityguidelinesdevelopment