Cargando…

Classification of root canal microorganisms using electronic-nose and discriminant analysis

BACKGROUND: Root canal treatment is a debridement process which disrupts and removes entire microorganisms from the root canal system. Identification of microorganisms may help clinicians decide on treatment alternatives such as using different irrigants, intracanal medicaments and antibiotics. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aksebzeci, Bekir H, Asyalı, Musa H, Kahraman, Yasemin, Er, Özgür, Kaya, Esma, Özbilge, Hatice, Kara, Sadık
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-9-77
_version_ 1782217458689507328
author Aksebzeci, Bekir H
Asyalı, Musa H
Kahraman, Yasemin
Er, Özgür
Kaya, Esma
Özbilge, Hatice
Kara, Sadık
author_facet Aksebzeci, Bekir H
Asyalı, Musa H
Kahraman, Yasemin
Er, Özgür
Kaya, Esma
Özbilge, Hatice
Kara, Sadık
author_sort Aksebzeci, Bekir H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Root canal treatment is a debridement process which disrupts and removes entire microorganisms from the root canal system. Identification of microorganisms may help clinicians decide on treatment alternatives such as using different irrigants, intracanal medicaments and antibiotics. However, the difficulty in cultivation and the complexity in isolation of predominant anaerobic microorganisms make clinicians resort to empirical medical treatments. For this reason, identification of microorganisms is not a routinely used procedure in root canal treatment. In this study, we aimed at classifying 7 different standard microorganism strains which are frequently seen in root canal infections, using odor data collected using an electronic nose instrument. METHOD: Our microorganism odor data set consisted of 5 repeated samples from 7 different classes at 4 concentration levels. For each concentration, 35 samples were classified using 3 different discriminant analysis methods. In order to determine an optimal setting for using electronic-nose in such an application, we have tried 3 different approaches in evaluating sensor responses. Moreover, we have used 3 different sensor baseline values in normalizing sensor responses. Since the number of sensors is relatively large compared to sample size, we have also investigated the influence of two different dimension reduction methods on classification performance. RESULTS: We have found that quadratic type dicriminant analysis outperforms other varieties of this method. We have also observed that classification performance decreases as the concentration decreases. Among different baseline values used for pre-processing the sensor responses, the model where the minimum values of sensor readings in the sample were accepted as the baseline yields better classification performance. Corresponding to this optimal choice of baseline value, we have noted that among different sensor response model and feature reduction method combinations, the difference model with standard deviation based dimension reduction or normalized fractional difference model with principal component analysis based dimension reduction results in the best overall performance across different concentrations. CONCLUSION: Our results reveal that the electronic nose technology is a promising and convenient alternative for classifying microorganisms that cause root canal infections. With our comprehensive approach, we have also determined optimal settings to obtain higher classification performance using this technology and discriminant analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3224911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32249112011-11-30 Classification of root canal microorganisms using electronic-nose and discriminant analysis Aksebzeci, Bekir H Asyalı, Musa H Kahraman, Yasemin Er, Özgür Kaya, Esma Özbilge, Hatice Kara, Sadık Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Root canal treatment is a debridement process which disrupts and removes entire microorganisms from the root canal system. Identification of microorganisms may help clinicians decide on treatment alternatives such as using different irrigants, intracanal medicaments and antibiotics. However, the difficulty in cultivation and the complexity in isolation of predominant anaerobic microorganisms make clinicians resort to empirical medical treatments. For this reason, identification of microorganisms is not a routinely used procedure in root canal treatment. In this study, we aimed at classifying 7 different standard microorganism strains which are frequently seen in root canal infections, using odor data collected using an electronic nose instrument. METHOD: Our microorganism odor data set consisted of 5 repeated samples from 7 different classes at 4 concentration levels. For each concentration, 35 samples were classified using 3 different discriminant analysis methods. In order to determine an optimal setting for using electronic-nose in such an application, we have tried 3 different approaches in evaluating sensor responses. Moreover, we have used 3 different sensor baseline values in normalizing sensor responses. Since the number of sensors is relatively large compared to sample size, we have also investigated the influence of two different dimension reduction methods on classification performance. RESULTS: We have found that quadratic type dicriminant analysis outperforms other varieties of this method. We have also observed that classification performance decreases as the concentration decreases. Among different baseline values used for pre-processing the sensor responses, the model where the minimum values of sensor readings in the sample were accepted as the baseline yields better classification performance. Corresponding to this optimal choice of baseline value, we have noted that among different sensor response model and feature reduction method combinations, the difference model with standard deviation based dimension reduction or normalized fractional difference model with principal component analysis based dimension reduction results in the best overall performance across different concentrations. CONCLUSION: Our results reveal that the electronic nose technology is a promising and convenient alternative for classifying microorganisms that cause root canal infections. With our comprehensive approach, we have also determined optimal settings to obtain higher classification performance using this technology and discriminant analysis. BioMed Central 2010-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3224911/ /pubmed/21092166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-9-77 Text en Copyright ©2010 Aksebzeci et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Aksebzeci, Bekir H
Asyalı, Musa H
Kahraman, Yasemin
Er, Özgür
Kaya, Esma
Özbilge, Hatice
Kara, Sadık
Classification of root canal microorganisms using electronic-nose and discriminant analysis
title Classification of root canal microorganisms using electronic-nose and discriminant analysis
title_full Classification of root canal microorganisms using electronic-nose and discriminant analysis
title_fullStr Classification of root canal microorganisms using electronic-nose and discriminant analysis
title_full_unstemmed Classification of root canal microorganisms using electronic-nose and discriminant analysis
title_short Classification of root canal microorganisms using electronic-nose and discriminant analysis
title_sort classification of root canal microorganisms using electronic-nose and discriminant analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-9-77
work_keys_str_mv AT aksebzecibekirh classificationofrootcanalmicroorganismsusingelectronicnoseanddiscriminantanalysis
AT asyalımusah classificationofrootcanalmicroorganismsusingelectronicnoseanddiscriminantanalysis
AT kahramanyasemin classificationofrootcanalmicroorganismsusingelectronicnoseanddiscriminantanalysis
AT erozgur classificationofrootcanalmicroorganismsusingelectronicnoseanddiscriminantanalysis
AT kayaesma classificationofrootcanalmicroorganismsusingelectronicnoseanddiscriminantanalysis
AT ozbilgehatice classificationofrootcanalmicroorganismsusingelectronicnoseanddiscriminantanalysis
AT karasadık classificationofrootcanalmicroorganismsusingelectronicnoseanddiscriminantanalysis