Cargando…
A review of RCTs in four medical journals to assess the use of imputation to overcome missing data in quality of life outcomes
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are perceived as the gold-standard method for evaluating healthcare interventions, and increasingly include quality of life (QoL) measures. The observed results are susceptible to bias if a substantial proportion of outcome data are missing. The review...
Autores principales: | Fielding, Shona, Maclennan, Graeme, Cook, Jonathan A, Ramsay, Craig R |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3225816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18694492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-51 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reporting and dealing with missing quality of life data in RCTs: has the picture changed in the last decade?
por: Fielding, S., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Simple imputation methods were inadequate for missing not at random (MNAR) quality of life data
por: Fielding, Shona, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Investigating the missing data mechanism in quality of life outcomes: a comparison of approaches
por: Fielding, Shona, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Handling missing data in RCTs; a review of the top medical journals
por: Bell, Melanie L, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Imputation of missing genotypes: an empirical evaluation of IMPUTE
por: Zhao, Zhenming, et al.
Publicado: (2008)