Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of the SEN-concept: Specialized Emergency Nurses (SEN) treating ankle/foot injuries

BACKGROUND: Emergency Departments (EDs) are confronted with progressive overcrowding. As a consequence, the workload for ED physicians increases and waiting times go up with the risk of unnecessary complications and patient dissatisfaction. To cope with these problems, Specialized Emergency Nurses (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derksen, Robert J, Coupé, Veerle MH, van Tulder, Maurits W, Veenings, Bart, Bakker, Fred C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3225880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17908322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-99
_version_ 1782217540207902720
author Derksen, Robert J
Coupé, Veerle MH
van Tulder, Maurits W
Veenings, Bart
Bakker, Fred C
author_facet Derksen, Robert J
Coupé, Veerle MH
van Tulder, Maurits W
Veenings, Bart
Bakker, Fred C
author_sort Derksen, Robert J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency Departments (EDs) are confronted with progressive overcrowding. As a consequence, the workload for ED physicians increases and waiting times go up with the risk of unnecessary complications and patient dissatisfaction. To cope with these problems, Specialized Emergency Nurses (SENs), regular ED-nurses receiving a short, injury-specific course, were trained to assess and treat minor injuries according to a specific protocol. METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial comparing House Officers (HOs) and SENs in their assessment of ankle and foot injuries. Cost prices were established for all parts of healthcare utilization involved. Total costs of health care utilization were computed per patient in both groups. Cost-effectiveness was investigated by comparing the difference in total cost between groups with the difference in sensitivity and specificity between groups in diagnosing fractures and severe sprains. Finally, cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated and presented on a cost-effectiveness plane. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between treatment groups for any of the health care resources assessed. However, the waiting times for both first assessment by a treatment officer and time spent waiting between hearing the diagnosis and final treatment were significantly longer in the HO group. There was no statistically significant difference in costs between groups. The total costs were € 186 (SD € 623) for patients in the SEN group and € 153 (SD € 529) for patients in the HO group. The difference in total costs was € 33 (95% CI: – € 84 to € 155). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was € 27 for a reduction of one missed diagnosis and € 18 for a reduction of one false negative. CONCLUSION: Considering the benefits of the SEN-concept in terms of decreased workload for the ED physicians, increased patient satisfaction and decreased waiting times, SENs appear to be a useful solution to the problem of ED crowding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3225880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32258802011-11-30 Cost-effectiveness of the SEN-concept: Specialized Emergency Nurses (SEN) treating ankle/foot injuries Derksen, Robert J Coupé, Veerle MH van Tulder, Maurits W Veenings, Bart Bakker, Fred C BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Emergency Departments (EDs) are confronted with progressive overcrowding. As a consequence, the workload for ED physicians increases and waiting times go up with the risk of unnecessary complications and patient dissatisfaction. To cope with these problems, Specialized Emergency Nurses (SENs), regular ED-nurses receiving a short, injury-specific course, were trained to assess and treat minor injuries according to a specific protocol. METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial comparing House Officers (HOs) and SENs in their assessment of ankle and foot injuries. Cost prices were established for all parts of healthcare utilization involved. Total costs of health care utilization were computed per patient in both groups. Cost-effectiveness was investigated by comparing the difference in total cost between groups with the difference in sensitivity and specificity between groups in diagnosing fractures and severe sprains. Finally, cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated and presented on a cost-effectiveness plane. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between treatment groups for any of the health care resources assessed. However, the waiting times for both first assessment by a treatment officer and time spent waiting between hearing the diagnosis and final treatment were significantly longer in the HO group. There was no statistically significant difference in costs between groups. The total costs were € 186 (SD € 623) for patients in the SEN group and € 153 (SD € 529) for patients in the HO group. The difference in total costs was € 33 (95% CI: – € 84 to € 155). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was € 27 for a reduction of one missed diagnosis and € 18 for a reduction of one false negative. CONCLUSION: Considering the benefits of the SEN-concept in terms of decreased workload for the ED physicians, increased patient satisfaction and decreased waiting times, SENs appear to be a useful solution to the problem of ED crowding. BioMed Central 2007-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3225880/ /pubmed/17908322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-99 Text en Copyright ©2007 Derksen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Derksen, Robert J
Coupé, Veerle MH
van Tulder, Maurits W
Veenings, Bart
Bakker, Fred C
Cost-effectiveness of the SEN-concept: Specialized Emergency Nurses (SEN) treating ankle/foot injuries
title Cost-effectiveness of the SEN-concept: Specialized Emergency Nurses (SEN) treating ankle/foot injuries
title_full Cost-effectiveness of the SEN-concept: Specialized Emergency Nurses (SEN) treating ankle/foot injuries
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of the SEN-concept: Specialized Emergency Nurses (SEN) treating ankle/foot injuries
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of the SEN-concept: Specialized Emergency Nurses (SEN) treating ankle/foot injuries
title_short Cost-effectiveness of the SEN-concept: Specialized Emergency Nurses (SEN) treating ankle/foot injuries
title_sort cost-effectiveness of the sen-concept: specialized emergency nurses (sen) treating ankle/foot injuries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3225880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17908322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-99
work_keys_str_mv AT derksenrobertj costeffectivenessofthesenconceptspecializedemergencynursessentreatinganklefootinjuries
AT coupeveerlemh costeffectivenessofthesenconceptspecializedemergencynursessentreatinganklefootinjuries
AT vantuldermauritsw costeffectivenessofthesenconceptspecializedemergencynursessentreatinganklefootinjuries
AT veeningsbart costeffectivenessofthesenconceptspecializedemergencynursessentreatinganklefootinjuries
AT bakkerfredc costeffectivenessofthesenconceptspecializedemergencynursessentreatinganklefootinjuries