Cargando…

An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management

Recent meta-analyses have created uncertainties regarding the appropriate clinical role of colloid resuscitation fluids in critically ill patients and prompted changes in fluid management practice. Such changes may not be justified in view of methodological limitations inherent in the meta-analyses....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sibbald, William J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3226175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11255593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc970
_version_ 1782217575562739712
author Sibbald, William J
author_facet Sibbald, William J
author_sort Sibbald, William J
collection PubMed
description Recent meta-analyses have created uncertainties regarding the appropriate clinical role of colloid resuscitation fluids in critically ill patients and prompted changes in fluid management practice. Such changes may not be justified in view of methodological limitations inherent in the meta-analyses. Further research is nevertheless needed to resolve the questions raised concerning the relationship between choice of resuscitation fluid and patient outcome. Animal studies can play an important part by reliably indicating whether particular fluids are likely to prove effective and safe in clinical trials. It is important to avoid costly large-scale clinical trials that fail to demonstrate the clinical utility of the tested therapy, as resources expended in failed trials raise overall development costs and thereby restrict the range of therapies meeting criteria of commercial feasibility. Promising therapies may thus not be pursued, even though an urgent clinical need may exist. An alternative pathway of preclinical research may be of value in avoiding some of the major clinical trial failures of recent years, particularly in the area of sepsis. This alternative pathway commences with the formulation of hypotheses by therapeutics developers. Independent preclinical investigators are challenged, by means of a competitive request for proposals, to test the hypotheses in rigorous randomized studies employing clinically relevant animal models. Promising proposals would then be selected for further development with the aid of peer review. The results of the randomized animal studies, along with other preclinical data, could also be evaluated using accepted principles of 'critical appraisal' commonly applied to clinical trial results. This critical appraisal might, where appropriate, include meta-analysis of animal study findings. This alternative preclinical pathway to new product evaluation should be completed before the commencement of large-scale clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3226175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32261752011-11-30 An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management Sibbald, William J Crit Care Proceedings Recent meta-analyses have created uncertainties regarding the appropriate clinical role of colloid resuscitation fluids in critically ill patients and prompted changes in fluid management practice. Such changes may not be justified in view of methodological limitations inherent in the meta-analyses. Further research is nevertheless needed to resolve the questions raised concerning the relationship between choice of resuscitation fluid and patient outcome. Animal studies can play an important part by reliably indicating whether particular fluids are likely to prove effective and safe in clinical trials. It is important to avoid costly large-scale clinical trials that fail to demonstrate the clinical utility of the tested therapy, as resources expended in failed trials raise overall development costs and thereby restrict the range of therapies meeting criteria of commercial feasibility. Promising therapies may thus not be pursued, even though an urgent clinical need may exist. An alternative pathway of preclinical research may be of value in avoiding some of the major clinical trial failures of recent years, particularly in the area of sepsis. This alternative pathway commences with the formulation of hypotheses by therapeutics developers. Independent preclinical investigators are challenged, by means of a competitive request for proposals, to test the hypotheses in rigorous randomized studies employing clinically relevant animal models. Promising proposals would then be selected for further development with the aid of peer review. The results of the randomized animal studies, along with other preclinical data, could also be evaluated using accepted principles of 'critical appraisal' commonly applied to clinical trial results. This critical appraisal might, where appropriate, include meta-analysis of animal study findings. This alternative preclinical pathway to new product evaluation should be completed before the commencement of large-scale clinical trials. BioMed Central 2000 2000-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3226175/ /pubmed/11255593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc970 Text en Copyright ©2000 Current Science Ltd
spellingShingle Proceedings
Sibbald, William J
An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management
title An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management
title_full An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management
title_fullStr An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management
title_full_unstemmed An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management
title_short An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management
title_sort alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3226175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11255593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc970
work_keys_str_mv AT sibbaldwilliamj analternativepathwayforpreclinicalresearchinfluidmanagement
AT sibbaldwilliamj alternativepathwayforpreclinicalresearchinfluidmanagement