Cargando…

The fallacy of coverage: uncovering disparities to improve immunization rates through evidence. Results from the Canadian International Immunization Initiative Phase 2 - Operational Research Grants

Immunization can and does save lives. However, the presence of vaccines does not easily translate into every child being vaccinated, and this is what the studies in this journal supplement reveal. From South Asia to West Africa,the evidence presented here reveals what we are calling the fallacy of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mhatre, Sharmila L, Schryer-Roy, Anne-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3226229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19828053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-9-S1-S1
_version_ 1782217581466222592
author Mhatre, Sharmila L
Schryer-Roy, Anne-Marie
author_facet Mhatre, Sharmila L
Schryer-Roy, Anne-Marie
author_sort Mhatre, Sharmila L
collection PubMed
description Immunization can and does save lives. However, the presence of vaccines does not easily translate into every child being vaccinated, and this is what the studies in this journal supplement reveal. From South Asia to West Africa,the evidence presented here reveals what we are calling the fallacy of coverage, going beyond uncovering the real vaccination rates to providing evidence on the reasons for the lack of effective coverage. The evidence for the fallacy of coverage is part of an operational research program entitled the Canadian International Immunization Initiative Phase 2 (CIII2). Through a competitive peer review process, six research grants were awarded to increase access to and enhance immunization services. This journal supplement provides a forum for the presentation of the results of five of the six studies. The story of the fallacy of coverage is made up of five theme areas of evidence - timeliness of immunization, social and gender inequities, vaccine efficacy, understanding demand side issues to tailor interventions, and national data sets masking actual district level coverage rates - that reveal the discrepancies in immunization coverage rates and the reasons behind these discrepancies. As part of the story, and to turn around the fallacy of coverage, the studies also provide proof of effective and locally relevant solutions. Policies and funding, while keeping an eye on future diseases, clearly need to maintain and increase support to address existing vaccine-preventable diseases to increase coverage such that by 2015 we can achieve 90% national vaccination coverage and reach the MDG of reducing mortality rates among children under five by two-thirds.The results from the operational research grants of the CIII2 offer some answers on how to reach this goal by demonstrating how locally generated evidence can inform immunization strategies to ensure that children who need to get vaccinated will get vaccinated, and vaccinated on time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3226229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32262292011-11-30 The fallacy of coverage: uncovering disparities to improve immunization rates through evidence. Results from the Canadian International Immunization Initiative Phase 2 - Operational Research Grants Mhatre, Sharmila L Schryer-Roy, Anne-Marie BMC Int Health Hum Rights Introduction Immunization can and does save lives. However, the presence of vaccines does not easily translate into every child being vaccinated, and this is what the studies in this journal supplement reveal. From South Asia to West Africa,the evidence presented here reveals what we are calling the fallacy of coverage, going beyond uncovering the real vaccination rates to providing evidence on the reasons for the lack of effective coverage. The evidence for the fallacy of coverage is part of an operational research program entitled the Canadian International Immunization Initiative Phase 2 (CIII2). Through a competitive peer review process, six research grants were awarded to increase access to and enhance immunization services. This journal supplement provides a forum for the presentation of the results of five of the six studies. The story of the fallacy of coverage is made up of five theme areas of evidence - timeliness of immunization, social and gender inequities, vaccine efficacy, understanding demand side issues to tailor interventions, and national data sets masking actual district level coverage rates - that reveal the discrepancies in immunization coverage rates and the reasons behind these discrepancies. As part of the story, and to turn around the fallacy of coverage, the studies also provide proof of effective and locally relevant solutions. Policies and funding, while keeping an eye on future diseases, clearly need to maintain and increase support to address existing vaccine-preventable diseases to increase coverage such that by 2015 we can achieve 90% national vaccination coverage and reach the MDG of reducing mortality rates among children under five by two-thirds.The results from the operational research grants of the CIII2 offer some answers on how to reach this goal by demonstrating how locally generated evidence can inform immunization strategies to ensure that children who need to get vaccinated will get vaccinated, and vaccinated on time. BioMed Central 2009-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3226229/ /pubmed/19828053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-9-S1-S1 Text en Copyright ©2009 Mhatre and Schryer-Roy; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Introduction
Mhatre, Sharmila L
Schryer-Roy, Anne-Marie
The fallacy of coverage: uncovering disparities to improve immunization rates through evidence. Results from the Canadian International Immunization Initiative Phase 2 - Operational Research Grants
title The fallacy of coverage: uncovering disparities to improve immunization rates through evidence. Results from the Canadian International Immunization Initiative Phase 2 - Operational Research Grants
title_full The fallacy of coverage: uncovering disparities to improve immunization rates through evidence. Results from the Canadian International Immunization Initiative Phase 2 - Operational Research Grants
title_fullStr The fallacy of coverage: uncovering disparities to improve immunization rates through evidence. Results from the Canadian International Immunization Initiative Phase 2 - Operational Research Grants
title_full_unstemmed The fallacy of coverage: uncovering disparities to improve immunization rates through evidence. Results from the Canadian International Immunization Initiative Phase 2 - Operational Research Grants
title_short The fallacy of coverage: uncovering disparities to improve immunization rates through evidence. Results from the Canadian International Immunization Initiative Phase 2 - Operational Research Grants
title_sort fallacy of coverage: uncovering disparities to improve immunization rates through evidence. results from the canadian international immunization initiative phase 2 - operational research grants
topic Introduction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3226229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19828053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-9-S1-S1
work_keys_str_mv AT mhatresharmilal thefallacyofcoverageuncoveringdisparitiestoimproveimmunizationratesthroughevidenceresultsfromthecanadianinternationalimmunizationinitiativephase2operationalresearchgrants
AT schryerroyannemarie thefallacyofcoverageuncoveringdisparitiestoimproveimmunizationratesthroughevidenceresultsfromthecanadianinternationalimmunizationinitiativephase2operationalresearchgrants
AT mhatresharmilal fallacyofcoverageuncoveringdisparitiestoimproveimmunizationratesthroughevidenceresultsfromthecanadianinternationalimmunizationinitiativephase2operationalresearchgrants
AT schryerroyannemarie fallacyofcoverageuncoveringdisparitiestoimproveimmunizationratesthroughevidenceresultsfromthecanadianinternationalimmunizationinitiativephase2operationalresearchgrants