Cargando…

Informing Selection of Nanomaterial Concentrations for ToxCast in Vitro Testing Based on Occupational Exposure Potential

Background: Little justification is generally provided for selection of in vitro assay testing concentrations for engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). Selection of concentration levels for hazard evaluation based on real-world exposure scenarios is desirable. Objectives: Our goal was to use estimates of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gangwal, Sumit, Brown, James S., Wang, Amy, Houck, Keith A., Dix, David J., Kavlock, Robert J., Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3226507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21788197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103750
_version_ 1782217628927918080
author Gangwal, Sumit
Brown, James S.
Wang, Amy
Houck, Keith A.
Dix, David J.
Kavlock, Robert J.
Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen
author_facet Gangwal, Sumit
Brown, James S.
Wang, Amy
Houck, Keith A.
Dix, David J.
Kavlock, Robert J.
Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen
author_sort Gangwal, Sumit
collection PubMed
description Background: Little justification is generally provided for selection of in vitro assay testing concentrations for engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). Selection of concentration levels for hazard evaluation based on real-world exposure scenarios is desirable. Objectives: Our goal was to use estimates of lung deposition after occupational exposure to nanomaterials to recommend in vitro testing concentrations for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ToxCast™ program. Here, we provide testing concentrations for carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) and silver (Ag) nanoparticles (NPs). Methods: We reviewed published ENM concentrations measured in air in manufacturing and R&D (research and development) laboratories to identify input levels for estimating ENM mass retained in the human lung using the multiple-path particle dosimetry (MPPD) model. Model input parameters were individually varied to estimate alveolar mass retained for different particle sizes (5–1,000 nm), aerosol concentrations (0.1 and 1 mg/m(3)), aspect ratios (2, 4, 10, and 167), and exposure durations (24 hr and a working lifetime). The calculated lung surface concentrations were then converted to in vitro solution concentrations. Results: Modeled alveolar mass retained after 24 hr is most affected by activity level and aerosol concentration. Alveolar retention for Ag and TiO(2) NPs and CNTs for a working-lifetime (45 years) exposure duration is similar to high-end concentrations (~ 30–400 μg/mL) typical of in vitro testing reported in the literature. Conclusions: Analyses performed are generally applicable for providing ENM testing concentrations for in vitro hazard screening studies, although further research is needed to improve the approach. Understanding the relationship between potential real-world exposures and in vitro test concentrations will facilitate interpretation of toxicological results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3226507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32265072012-01-04 Informing Selection of Nanomaterial Concentrations for ToxCast in Vitro Testing Based on Occupational Exposure Potential Gangwal, Sumit Brown, James S. Wang, Amy Houck, Keith A. Dix, David J. Kavlock, Robert J. Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen Environ Health Perspect Review Background: Little justification is generally provided for selection of in vitro assay testing concentrations for engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). Selection of concentration levels for hazard evaluation based on real-world exposure scenarios is desirable. Objectives: Our goal was to use estimates of lung deposition after occupational exposure to nanomaterials to recommend in vitro testing concentrations for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ToxCast™ program. Here, we provide testing concentrations for carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) and silver (Ag) nanoparticles (NPs). Methods: We reviewed published ENM concentrations measured in air in manufacturing and R&D (research and development) laboratories to identify input levels for estimating ENM mass retained in the human lung using the multiple-path particle dosimetry (MPPD) model. Model input parameters were individually varied to estimate alveolar mass retained for different particle sizes (5–1,000 nm), aerosol concentrations (0.1 and 1 mg/m(3)), aspect ratios (2, 4, 10, and 167), and exposure durations (24 hr and a working lifetime). The calculated lung surface concentrations were then converted to in vitro solution concentrations. Results: Modeled alveolar mass retained after 24 hr is most affected by activity level and aerosol concentration. Alveolar retention for Ag and TiO(2) NPs and CNTs for a working-lifetime (45 years) exposure duration is similar to high-end concentrations (~ 30–400 μg/mL) typical of in vitro testing reported in the literature. Conclusions: Analyses performed are generally applicable for providing ENM testing concentrations for in vitro hazard screening studies, although further research is needed to improve the approach. Understanding the relationship between potential real-world exposures and in vitro test concentrations will facilitate interpretation of toxicological results. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2011-07-25 2011-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3226507/ /pubmed/21788197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103750 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Review
Gangwal, Sumit
Brown, James S.
Wang, Amy
Houck, Keith A.
Dix, David J.
Kavlock, Robert J.
Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen
Informing Selection of Nanomaterial Concentrations for ToxCast in Vitro Testing Based on Occupational Exposure Potential
title Informing Selection of Nanomaterial Concentrations for ToxCast in Vitro Testing Based on Occupational Exposure Potential
title_full Informing Selection of Nanomaterial Concentrations for ToxCast in Vitro Testing Based on Occupational Exposure Potential
title_fullStr Informing Selection of Nanomaterial Concentrations for ToxCast in Vitro Testing Based on Occupational Exposure Potential
title_full_unstemmed Informing Selection of Nanomaterial Concentrations for ToxCast in Vitro Testing Based on Occupational Exposure Potential
title_short Informing Selection of Nanomaterial Concentrations for ToxCast in Vitro Testing Based on Occupational Exposure Potential
title_sort informing selection of nanomaterial concentrations for toxcast in vitro testing based on occupational exposure potential
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3226507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21788197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103750
work_keys_str_mv AT gangwalsumit informingselectionofnanomaterialconcentrationsfortoxcastinvitrotestingbasedonoccupationalexposurepotential
AT brownjamess informingselectionofnanomaterialconcentrationsfortoxcastinvitrotestingbasedonoccupationalexposurepotential
AT wangamy informingselectionofnanomaterialconcentrationsfortoxcastinvitrotestingbasedonoccupationalexposurepotential
AT houckkeitha informingselectionofnanomaterialconcentrationsfortoxcastinvitrotestingbasedonoccupationalexposurepotential
AT dixdavidj informingselectionofnanomaterialconcentrationsfortoxcastinvitrotestingbasedonoccupationalexposurepotential
AT kavlockrobertj informingselectionofnanomaterialconcentrationsfortoxcastinvitrotestingbasedonoccupationalexposurepotential
AT hubalelaineacohen informingselectionofnanomaterialconcentrationsfortoxcastinvitrotestingbasedonoccupationalexposurepotential