Cargando…

The VICI-trial: high frequency oscillation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an international multicentre randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a severe congenital anomaly of the diaphragm resulting in pulmonary hypoplasia and pulmonary hypertension. It is associated with a high risk of mortality and pulmonary morbidity. Previous retrospective studies have reported high frequency oscillat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Hout, Lieke, Tibboel, Dick, Vijfhuize, Sanne, te Beest, Harma, Hop, Wim, Reiss, Irwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3226543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22047542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-98
_version_ 1782217637156093952
author van den Hout, Lieke
Tibboel, Dick
Vijfhuize, Sanne
te Beest, Harma
Hop, Wim
Reiss, Irwin
author_facet van den Hout, Lieke
Tibboel, Dick
Vijfhuize, Sanne
te Beest, Harma
Hop, Wim
Reiss, Irwin
author_sort van den Hout, Lieke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a severe congenital anomaly of the diaphragm resulting in pulmonary hypoplasia and pulmonary hypertension. It is associated with a high risk of mortality and pulmonary morbidity. Previous retrospective studies have reported high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFO) to reduce pulmonary morbidity in infants with CDH, while others indicated HFO to be associated with worse outcome. We therefore aimed to develop a randomized controlled trial to compare initial ventilatory treatment with high-frequency oscillation and conventional ventilation in infants with CDH. METHODS/DESIGN: This trial is designed as a multicentre trial in which 400 infants (200 in each arm) will be included. Primary outcome measures are BPD, described as oxygen dependency by day 28 according to the definition of Jobe and Bancalari, and/or mortality by day 28. All liveborn infants with CDH born at a gestational age of over 34 weeks and no other severe congenital anomalies are eligible for inclusion. Parental informed consent is asked antenatally and the allocated ventilation mode starts within two hours after birth. Laboratory samples of blood, urine and tracheal aspirate are taken at the first day of life, day 3, day 7, day 14 and day 28 to evaluate laboratory markers for ventilator-induced lung injury and pulmonary hypertension. DISCUSSION: To date, randomized clinical trials are lacking in the field of CDH. The VICI-trial, as the first randomized clinical trial in the field of CDH, may provide further insight in ventilation strategies in CDH patient. This may hopefully prevent mortality and morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR1310
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3226543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32265432011-11-30 The VICI-trial: high frequency oscillation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an international multicentre randomized controlled trial van den Hout, Lieke Tibboel, Dick Vijfhuize, Sanne te Beest, Harma Hop, Wim Reiss, Irwin BMC Pediatr Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a severe congenital anomaly of the diaphragm resulting in pulmonary hypoplasia and pulmonary hypertension. It is associated with a high risk of mortality and pulmonary morbidity. Previous retrospective studies have reported high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFO) to reduce pulmonary morbidity in infants with CDH, while others indicated HFO to be associated with worse outcome. We therefore aimed to develop a randomized controlled trial to compare initial ventilatory treatment with high-frequency oscillation and conventional ventilation in infants with CDH. METHODS/DESIGN: This trial is designed as a multicentre trial in which 400 infants (200 in each arm) will be included. Primary outcome measures are BPD, described as oxygen dependency by day 28 according to the definition of Jobe and Bancalari, and/or mortality by day 28. All liveborn infants with CDH born at a gestational age of over 34 weeks and no other severe congenital anomalies are eligible for inclusion. Parental informed consent is asked antenatally and the allocated ventilation mode starts within two hours after birth. Laboratory samples of blood, urine and tracheal aspirate are taken at the first day of life, day 3, day 7, day 14 and day 28 to evaluate laboratory markers for ventilator-induced lung injury and pulmonary hypertension. DISCUSSION: To date, randomized clinical trials are lacking in the field of CDH. The VICI-trial, as the first randomized clinical trial in the field of CDH, may provide further insight in ventilation strategies in CDH patient. This may hopefully prevent mortality and morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR1310 BioMed Central 2011-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3226543/ /pubmed/22047542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-98 Text en Copyright ©2011 van den Hout et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van den Hout, Lieke
Tibboel, Dick
Vijfhuize, Sanne
te Beest, Harma
Hop, Wim
Reiss, Irwin
The VICI-trial: high frequency oscillation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an international multicentre randomized controlled trial
title The VICI-trial: high frequency oscillation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an international multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full The VICI-trial: high frequency oscillation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an international multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The VICI-trial: high frequency oscillation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an international multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The VICI-trial: high frequency oscillation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an international multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_short The VICI-trial: high frequency oscillation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an international multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_sort vici-trial: high frequency oscillation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an international multicentre randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3226543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22047542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-98
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenhoutlieke thevicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tibboeldick thevicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vijfhuizesanne thevicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tebeestharma thevicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hopwim thevicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reissirwin thevicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenhoutlieke vicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tibboeldick vicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vijfhuizesanne vicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tebeestharma vicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hopwim vicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reissirwin vicitrialhighfrequencyoscillationversusconventionalmechanicalventilationinnewbornswithcongenitaldiaphragmaticherniaaninternationalmulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial