Cargando…
Comparative assessment of implantable hip devices with different bearing surfaces: systematic appraisal of evidence
Objective To determine comparative safety and effectiveness of combinations of bearing surfaces of hip implants. Design Systematic review of clinical trials, observational studies, and registries. Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, reference lists of articles, annual...
Autores principales: | Sedrakyan, Art, Normand, Sharon-Lise T, Dabic, Stefan, Jacobs, Samantha, Graves, Stephen, Marinac-Dabic, Danica |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3226583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22127517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7434 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Two-Year Revision Rates in Total Ankle Replacement Versus Ankle Arthrodesis: A Population-Based Propensity-Score-Matched Comparison from New York State and California
por: Randsborg, Per-Henrik, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage
por: Cook, Jonathan A, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Association of Sex With Risk of 2-Year Revision Among Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty
por: Chen, Amanda, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Development of a coordinated registry network for pelvic organ prolapse technologies
por: Baird, Courtney E, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Developing the foundation for assessment of Devices used for Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions (DAISI) using a Coordinated Registry Network
por: LeRoy, Hartley, et al.
Publicado: (2022)