Cargando…
Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
The scaling of body parts is a central feature of animal morphology(1-7). Within species, morphological traits need to be correctly proportioned to the body for the organism to function; larger individuals typically have larger body parts and smaller individuals generally have smaller body parts, su...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MyJove Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21989026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/3162 |
_version_ | 1782217687444750336 |
---|---|
author | Stillwell, R. Craig Dworkin, Ian Shingleton, Alexander W. Frankino, W. Anthony |
author_facet | Stillwell, R. Craig Dworkin, Ian Shingleton, Alexander W. Frankino, W. Anthony |
author_sort | Stillwell, R. Craig |
collection | PubMed |
description | The scaling of body parts is a central feature of animal morphology(1-7). Within species, morphological traits need to be correctly proportioned to the body for the organism to function; larger individuals typically have larger body parts and smaller individuals generally have smaller body parts, such that overall body shape is maintained across a range of adult body sizes. The requirement for correct proportions means that individuals within species usually exhibit low variation in relative trait size. In contrast, relative trait size can vary dramatically among species and is a primary mechanism by which morphological diversity is produced. Over a century of comparative work has established these intra- and interspecific patterns(3,4). Perhaps the most widely used approach to describe this variation is to calculate the scaling relationship between the size of two morphological traits using the allometric equation y=bxα, where x and y are the size of the two traits, such as organ and body size(8,9). This equation describes the within-group (e.g., species, population) scaling relationship between two traits as both vary in size. Log-transformation of this equation produces a simple linear equation, log(y) = log(b) + αlog(x) and log-log plots of the size of different traits among individuals of the same species typically reveal linear scaling with an intercept of log(b) and a slope of α, called the 'allometric coefficient'(9,10). Morphological variation among groups is described by differences in scaling relationship intercepts or slopes for a given trait pair. Consequently, variation in the parameters of the allometric equation (b and α) elegantly describes the shape variation captured in the relationship between organ and body size within and among biological groups (see (11,12)). Not all traits scale linearly with each other or with body size (e.g., (13,14)) Hence, morphological scaling relationships are most informative when the data are taken from the full range of trait sizes. Here we describe how simple experimental manipulation of diet can be used to produce the full range of body size in insects. This permits an estimation of the full scaling relationship for any given pair of traits, allowing a complete description of how shape covaries with size and a robust comparison of scaling relationship parameters among biological groups. Although we focus on Drosophila, our methodology should be applicable to nearly any fully metamorphic insect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3227175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | MyJove Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32271752011-12-02 Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila Stillwell, R. Craig Dworkin, Ian Shingleton, Alexander W. Frankino, W. Anthony J Vis Exp Developmental Biology The scaling of body parts is a central feature of animal morphology(1-7). Within species, morphological traits need to be correctly proportioned to the body for the organism to function; larger individuals typically have larger body parts and smaller individuals generally have smaller body parts, such that overall body shape is maintained across a range of adult body sizes. The requirement for correct proportions means that individuals within species usually exhibit low variation in relative trait size. In contrast, relative trait size can vary dramatically among species and is a primary mechanism by which morphological diversity is produced. Over a century of comparative work has established these intra- and interspecific patterns(3,4). Perhaps the most widely used approach to describe this variation is to calculate the scaling relationship between the size of two morphological traits using the allometric equation y=bxα, where x and y are the size of the two traits, such as organ and body size(8,9). This equation describes the within-group (e.g., species, population) scaling relationship between two traits as both vary in size. Log-transformation of this equation produces a simple linear equation, log(y) = log(b) + αlog(x) and log-log plots of the size of different traits among individuals of the same species typically reveal linear scaling with an intercept of log(b) and a slope of α, called the 'allometric coefficient'(9,10). Morphological variation among groups is described by differences in scaling relationship intercepts or slopes for a given trait pair. Consequently, variation in the parameters of the allometric equation (b and α) elegantly describes the shape variation captured in the relationship between organ and body size within and among biological groups (see (11,12)). Not all traits scale linearly with each other or with body size (e.g., (13,14)) Hence, morphological scaling relationships are most informative when the data are taken from the full range of trait sizes. Here we describe how simple experimental manipulation of diet can be used to produce the full range of body size in insects. This permits an estimation of the full scaling relationship for any given pair of traits, allowing a complete description of how shape covaries with size and a robust comparison of scaling relationship parameters among biological groups. Although we focus on Drosophila, our methodology should be applicable to nearly any fully metamorphic insect. MyJove Corporation 2011-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3227175/ /pubmed/21989026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/3162 Text en Copyright © 2011, Journal of Visualized Experiments http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Developmental Biology Stillwell, R. Craig Dworkin, Ian Shingleton, Alexander W. Frankino, W. Anthony Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila |
title | Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila |
title_full | Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila |
title_fullStr | Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila |
title_short | Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila |
title_sort | experimental manipulation of body size to estimate morphological scaling relationships in drosophila |
topic | Developmental Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21989026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/3162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stillwellrcraig experimentalmanipulationofbodysizetoestimatemorphologicalscalingrelationshipsindrosophila AT dworkinian experimentalmanipulationofbodysizetoestimatemorphologicalscalingrelationshipsindrosophila AT shingletonalexanderw experimentalmanipulationofbodysizetoestimatemorphologicalscalingrelationshipsindrosophila AT frankinowanthony experimentalmanipulationofbodysizetoestimatemorphologicalscalingrelationshipsindrosophila |