Cargando…

Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) of natural heterogeneous biofilm is today facilitated by a comprehensive range of staining techniques, one of them being fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).(1,2) We performed a pilot study in which oral biofilm samples collected from fixed orthodontic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klug, Barbara, Rodler, Claudia, Koller, Martin, Wimmer, Gernot, Kessler, Harald H., Grube, Martin, Santigli, Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MyJove Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22041974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/2967
_version_ 1782217692732719104
author Klug, Barbara
Rodler, Claudia
Koller, Martin
Wimmer, Gernot
Kessler, Harald H.
Grube, Martin
Santigli, Elisabeth
author_facet Klug, Barbara
Rodler, Claudia
Koller, Martin
Wimmer, Gernot
Kessler, Harald H.
Grube, Martin
Santigli, Elisabeth
author_sort Klug, Barbara
collection PubMed
description Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) of natural heterogeneous biofilm is today facilitated by a comprehensive range of staining techniques, one of them being fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).(1,2) We performed a pilot study in which oral biofilm samples collected from fixed orthodontic appliances (palatal expanders) were stained by FISH, the objective being to assess the three-dimensional organization of natural biofilm and plaque accumulation.(3,4) FISH creates an opportunity to stain cells in their native biofilm environment by the use of fluorescently labeled 16S rRNA-targeting probes.(4-7,19) Compared to alternative techniques like immunofluorescent labeling, this is an inexpensive, precise and straightforward labeling technique to investigate different bacterial groups in mixed biofilm consortia.(18,20) General probes were used that bind to Eubacteria (EUB338 + EUB338II + EUB338III; hereafter EUBmix),(8-10) Firmicutes (LGC354 A-C; hereafter LGCmix),(9,10) and Bacteroidetes (Bac303).(11) In addition, specific probes binding to Streptococcus mutans (MUT590)(12,13) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (POGI)(13,14) were used. The extreme hardness of the surface materials involved (stainless steel and acrylic resin) compelled us to find new ways of preparing the biofilm. As these surface materials could not be readily cut with a cryotome, various sampling methods were explored to obtain intact oral biofilm. The most workable of these approaches is presented in this communication. Small flakes of the biofilm-carrying acrylic resin were scraped off with a sterile scalpel, taking care not to damage the biofilm structure. Forceps were used to collect biofilm from the steel surfaces. Once collected, the samples were fixed and placed directly on polysine coated glass slides. FISH was performed directly on these slides with the probes mentioned above. Various FISH protocols were combined and modified to create a new protocol that was easy to handle.(5,10,14,15) Subsequently the samples were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Well-known configurations(3,4,16,17) could be visualized, including mushroom-style formations and clusters of coccoid bacteria pervaded by channels. In addition, the bacterial composition of these typical biofilm structures were analyzed and 2D and 3D images created.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3227208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher MyJove Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32272082013-10-20 Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Klug, Barbara Rodler, Claudia Koller, Martin Wimmer, Gernot Kessler, Harald H. Grube, Martin Santigli, Elisabeth J Vis Exp Medicine Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) of natural heterogeneous biofilm is today facilitated by a comprehensive range of staining techniques, one of them being fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).(1,2) We performed a pilot study in which oral biofilm samples collected from fixed orthodontic appliances (palatal expanders) were stained by FISH, the objective being to assess the three-dimensional organization of natural biofilm and plaque accumulation.(3,4) FISH creates an opportunity to stain cells in their native biofilm environment by the use of fluorescently labeled 16S rRNA-targeting probes.(4-7,19) Compared to alternative techniques like immunofluorescent labeling, this is an inexpensive, precise and straightforward labeling technique to investigate different bacterial groups in mixed biofilm consortia.(18,20) General probes were used that bind to Eubacteria (EUB338 + EUB338II + EUB338III; hereafter EUBmix),(8-10) Firmicutes (LGC354 A-C; hereafter LGCmix),(9,10) and Bacteroidetes (Bac303).(11) In addition, specific probes binding to Streptococcus mutans (MUT590)(12,13) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (POGI)(13,14) were used. The extreme hardness of the surface materials involved (stainless steel and acrylic resin) compelled us to find new ways of preparing the biofilm. As these surface materials could not be readily cut with a cryotome, various sampling methods were explored to obtain intact oral biofilm. The most workable of these approaches is presented in this communication. Small flakes of the biofilm-carrying acrylic resin were scraped off with a sterile scalpel, taking care not to damage the biofilm structure. Forceps were used to collect biofilm from the steel surfaces. Once collected, the samples were fixed and placed directly on polysine coated glass slides. FISH was performed directly on these slides with the probes mentioned above. Various FISH protocols were combined and modified to create a new protocol that was easy to handle.(5,10,14,15) Subsequently the samples were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Well-known configurations(3,4,16,17) could be visualized, including mushroom-style formations and clusters of coccoid bacteria pervaded by channels. In addition, the bacterial composition of these typical biofilm structures were analyzed and 2D and 3D images created. MyJove Corporation 2011-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3227208/ /pubmed/22041974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/2967 Text en Copyright © 2011, Journal of Visualized Experiments http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Medicine
Klug, Barbara
Rodler, Claudia
Koller, Martin
Wimmer, Gernot
Kessler, Harald H.
Grube, Martin
Santigli, Elisabeth
Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
title Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
title_full Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
title_fullStr Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
title_short Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
title_sort oral biofilm analysis of palatal expanders by fluorescence in-situ hybridization and confocal laser scanning microscopy
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22041974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/2967
work_keys_str_mv AT klugbarbara oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy
AT rodlerclaudia oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy
AT kollermartin oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy
AT wimmergernot oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy
AT kesslerharaldh oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy
AT grubemartin oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy
AT santiglielisabeth oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy