Cargando…
Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) of natural heterogeneous biofilm is today facilitated by a comprehensive range of staining techniques, one of them being fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).(1,2) We performed a pilot study in which oral biofilm samples collected from fixed orthodontic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MyJove Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22041974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/2967 |
_version_ | 1782217692732719104 |
---|---|
author | Klug, Barbara Rodler, Claudia Koller, Martin Wimmer, Gernot Kessler, Harald H. Grube, Martin Santigli, Elisabeth |
author_facet | Klug, Barbara Rodler, Claudia Koller, Martin Wimmer, Gernot Kessler, Harald H. Grube, Martin Santigli, Elisabeth |
author_sort | Klug, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) of natural heterogeneous biofilm is today facilitated by a comprehensive range of staining techniques, one of them being fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).(1,2) We performed a pilot study in which oral biofilm samples collected from fixed orthodontic appliances (palatal expanders) were stained by FISH, the objective being to assess the three-dimensional organization of natural biofilm and plaque accumulation.(3,4) FISH creates an opportunity to stain cells in their native biofilm environment by the use of fluorescently labeled 16S rRNA-targeting probes.(4-7,19) Compared to alternative techniques like immunofluorescent labeling, this is an inexpensive, precise and straightforward labeling technique to investigate different bacterial groups in mixed biofilm consortia.(18,20) General probes were used that bind to Eubacteria (EUB338 + EUB338II + EUB338III; hereafter EUBmix),(8-10) Firmicutes (LGC354 A-C; hereafter LGCmix),(9,10) and Bacteroidetes (Bac303).(11) In addition, specific probes binding to Streptococcus mutans (MUT590)(12,13) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (POGI)(13,14) were used. The extreme hardness of the surface materials involved (stainless steel and acrylic resin) compelled us to find new ways of preparing the biofilm. As these surface materials could not be readily cut with a cryotome, various sampling methods were explored to obtain intact oral biofilm. The most workable of these approaches is presented in this communication. Small flakes of the biofilm-carrying acrylic resin were scraped off with a sterile scalpel, taking care not to damage the biofilm structure. Forceps were used to collect biofilm from the steel surfaces. Once collected, the samples were fixed and placed directly on polysine coated glass slides. FISH was performed directly on these slides with the probes mentioned above. Various FISH protocols were combined and modified to create a new protocol that was easy to handle.(5,10,14,15) Subsequently the samples were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Well-known configurations(3,4,16,17) could be visualized, including mushroom-style formations and clusters of coccoid bacteria pervaded by channels. In addition, the bacterial composition of these typical biofilm structures were analyzed and 2D and 3D images created. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3227208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | MyJove Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32272082013-10-20 Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Klug, Barbara Rodler, Claudia Koller, Martin Wimmer, Gernot Kessler, Harald H. Grube, Martin Santigli, Elisabeth J Vis Exp Medicine Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) of natural heterogeneous biofilm is today facilitated by a comprehensive range of staining techniques, one of them being fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).(1,2) We performed a pilot study in which oral biofilm samples collected from fixed orthodontic appliances (palatal expanders) were stained by FISH, the objective being to assess the three-dimensional organization of natural biofilm and plaque accumulation.(3,4) FISH creates an opportunity to stain cells in their native biofilm environment by the use of fluorescently labeled 16S rRNA-targeting probes.(4-7,19) Compared to alternative techniques like immunofluorescent labeling, this is an inexpensive, precise and straightforward labeling technique to investigate different bacterial groups in mixed biofilm consortia.(18,20) General probes were used that bind to Eubacteria (EUB338 + EUB338II + EUB338III; hereafter EUBmix),(8-10) Firmicutes (LGC354 A-C; hereafter LGCmix),(9,10) and Bacteroidetes (Bac303).(11) In addition, specific probes binding to Streptococcus mutans (MUT590)(12,13) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (POGI)(13,14) were used. The extreme hardness of the surface materials involved (stainless steel and acrylic resin) compelled us to find new ways of preparing the biofilm. As these surface materials could not be readily cut with a cryotome, various sampling methods were explored to obtain intact oral biofilm. The most workable of these approaches is presented in this communication. Small flakes of the biofilm-carrying acrylic resin were scraped off with a sterile scalpel, taking care not to damage the biofilm structure. Forceps were used to collect biofilm from the steel surfaces. Once collected, the samples were fixed and placed directly on polysine coated glass slides. FISH was performed directly on these slides with the probes mentioned above. Various FISH protocols were combined and modified to create a new protocol that was easy to handle.(5,10,14,15) Subsequently the samples were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Well-known configurations(3,4,16,17) could be visualized, including mushroom-style formations and clusters of coccoid bacteria pervaded by channels. In addition, the bacterial composition of these typical biofilm structures were analyzed and 2D and 3D images created. MyJove Corporation 2011-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3227208/ /pubmed/22041974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/2967 Text en Copyright © 2011, Journal of Visualized Experiments http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Medicine Klug, Barbara Rodler, Claudia Koller, Martin Wimmer, Gernot Kessler, Harald H. Grube, Martin Santigli, Elisabeth Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy |
title | Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy |
title_full | Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy |
title_fullStr | Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy |
title_short | Oral Biofilm Analysis of Palatal Expanders by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy |
title_sort | oral biofilm analysis of palatal expanders by fluorescence in-situ hybridization and confocal laser scanning microscopy |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22041974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/2967 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klugbarbara oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy AT rodlerclaudia oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy AT kollermartin oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy AT wimmergernot oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy AT kesslerharaldh oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy AT grubemartin oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy AT santiglielisabeth oralbiofilmanalysisofpalatalexpandersbyfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandconfocallaserscanningmicroscopy |