Cargando…

A retrospective clinical evaluation of success rate in endodontic-treated premolars restored with composite resin and fiber reinforced composite posts

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the survival rate and causes of failure of quartz fiber posts used to restore endodontically treated teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with endodontically treated premolar and anterior teeth that were then restored with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghavamnasiri, Marjaneh, Maleknejad, Fatemeh, Ameri, Hamideh, Moghaddas, Mohammad Javad, Farzaneh, Fatemeh, Chasteen, Joseph E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22144807
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.87203
_version_ 1782217705897590784
author Ghavamnasiri, Marjaneh
Maleknejad, Fatemeh
Ameri, Hamideh
Moghaddas, Mohammad Javad
Farzaneh, Fatemeh
Chasteen, Joseph E
author_facet Ghavamnasiri, Marjaneh
Maleknejad, Fatemeh
Ameri, Hamideh
Moghaddas, Mohammad Javad
Farzaneh, Fatemeh
Chasteen, Joseph E
author_sort Ghavamnasiri, Marjaneh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the survival rate and causes of failure of quartz fiber posts used to restore endodontically treated teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with endodontically treated premolar and anterior teeth that were then restored with a coronoradicular quartz fiber post and extensive composite resin restorations were selected for participation in the study. The age of the restorations ranged from 1 to 6 years. Survival probabilities of the restorations as well as causes of failures were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Logistic regression (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The overall cumulative survival rate (48.8%) was determined, while the survival probabilities after 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 years of service were 88.37%, 60.95%, 45.71%, 32.65%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The survival probability of endodontically treated teeth restored with a quartz fiber post and composite restorations is associated with the dental arch.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3227285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32272852011-12-05 A retrospective clinical evaluation of success rate in endodontic-treated premolars restored with composite resin and fiber reinforced composite posts Ghavamnasiri, Marjaneh Maleknejad, Fatemeh Ameri, Hamideh Moghaddas, Mohammad Javad Farzaneh, Fatemeh Chasteen, Joseph E J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the survival rate and causes of failure of quartz fiber posts used to restore endodontically treated teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with endodontically treated premolar and anterior teeth that were then restored with a coronoradicular quartz fiber post and extensive composite resin restorations were selected for participation in the study. The age of the restorations ranged from 1 to 6 years. Survival probabilities of the restorations as well as causes of failures were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Logistic regression (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The overall cumulative survival rate (48.8%) was determined, while the survival probabilities after 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 years of service were 88.37%, 60.95%, 45.71%, 32.65%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The survival probability of endodontically treated teeth restored with a quartz fiber post and composite restorations is associated with the dental arch. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3227285/ /pubmed/22144807 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.87203 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghavamnasiri, Marjaneh
Maleknejad, Fatemeh
Ameri, Hamideh
Moghaddas, Mohammad Javad
Farzaneh, Fatemeh
Chasteen, Joseph E
A retrospective clinical evaluation of success rate in endodontic-treated premolars restored with composite resin and fiber reinforced composite posts
title A retrospective clinical evaluation of success rate in endodontic-treated premolars restored with composite resin and fiber reinforced composite posts
title_full A retrospective clinical evaluation of success rate in endodontic-treated premolars restored with composite resin and fiber reinforced composite posts
title_fullStr A retrospective clinical evaluation of success rate in endodontic-treated premolars restored with composite resin and fiber reinforced composite posts
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective clinical evaluation of success rate in endodontic-treated premolars restored with composite resin and fiber reinforced composite posts
title_short A retrospective clinical evaluation of success rate in endodontic-treated premolars restored with composite resin and fiber reinforced composite posts
title_sort retrospective clinical evaluation of success rate in endodontic-treated premolars restored with composite resin and fiber reinforced composite posts
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22144807
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.87203
work_keys_str_mv AT ghavamnasirimarjaneh aretrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts
AT maleknejadfatemeh aretrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts
AT amerihamideh aretrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts
AT moghaddasmohammadjavad aretrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts
AT farzanehfatemeh aretrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts
AT chasteenjosephe aretrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts
AT ghavamnasirimarjaneh retrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts
AT maleknejadfatemeh retrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts
AT amerihamideh retrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts
AT moghaddasmohammadjavad retrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts
AT farzanehfatemeh retrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts
AT chasteenjosephe retrospectiveclinicalevaluationofsuccessrateinendodontictreatedpremolarsrestoredwithcompositeresinandfiberreinforcedcompositeposts