Cargando…

Outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis: Comparison of three methods

BACKGROUND: Tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis has a 100 years history and any set of tendons that can be considered to be useful has been utilized for the purpose. The pronator tress is used for restoration of wrist dorsiflexion, while the flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpiulnaris, and fle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moussavi, Alia Ayatollahi, Saied, Alireza, Karbalaeikhani, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22144751
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.87133
_version_ 1782217723339603968
author Moussavi, Alia Ayatollahi
Saied, Alireza
Karbalaeikhani, Ali
author_facet Moussavi, Alia Ayatollahi
Saied, Alireza
Karbalaeikhani, Ali
author_sort Moussavi, Alia Ayatollahi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis has a 100 years history and any set of tendons that can be considered to be useful has been utilized for the purpose. The pronator tress is used for restoration of wrist dorsiflexion, while the flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpiulnaris, and flexor digitorum superficialis are variably used in each for fingers and thumb movements. The present study was a retrospective analysis, designed to compare three methods of tendon transfer for radial nerve palsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 41 patients with irreversible radial nerve paralysis, who had underwent three different types of tendon transfers (using different tendons for transfer) between March 2005 and September 2009, included in the study. The pronator teres was transferred for wrist extention. Flexor carpi ulnaris (group 1, n=18), flexor carpi radialis (group 2, n=10) and flexor digitorum superficialis (group 3, n=13) was used to achieve finger extention. Palmaris longus was used to achieve thumb extention and abduction. At the final examination, related ranges of motions were recorded and the patients were asked about their overall satisfaction with the operation, their ability, and time of return to their previous jobs, and in addition, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) Score was measured and recorded for each patient. RESULTS: The difference between the groups with regard to DASH score, ability, and time of return to job, satisfaction with the operation, and range of motions was not statistically significant (P>0.05). All of the patients had experienced functional improvement and overall satisfaction rate was 95%. No complication directly attributable to the operation was noted, except for proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture in three patents. CONCLUSION: The tendon transfer for irreversible radial nerve palsy is very successful and probably the success is not related to type of tendon used for transfer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3227362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32273622011-12-05 Outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis: Comparison of three methods Moussavi, Alia Ayatollahi Saied, Alireza Karbalaeikhani, Ali Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis has a 100 years history and any set of tendons that can be considered to be useful has been utilized for the purpose. The pronator tress is used for restoration of wrist dorsiflexion, while the flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpiulnaris, and flexor digitorum superficialis are variably used in each for fingers and thumb movements. The present study was a retrospective analysis, designed to compare three methods of tendon transfer for radial nerve palsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 41 patients with irreversible radial nerve paralysis, who had underwent three different types of tendon transfers (using different tendons for transfer) between March 2005 and September 2009, included in the study. The pronator teres was transferred for wrist extention. Flexor carpi ulnaris (group 1, n=18), flexor carpi radialis (group 2, n=10) and flexor digitorum superficialis (group 3, n=13) was used to achieve finger extention. Palmaris longus was used to achieve thumb extention and abduction. At the final examination, related ranges of motions were recorded and the patients were asked about their overall satisfaction with the operation, their ability, and time of return to their previous jobs, and in addition, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) Score was measured and recorded for each patient. RESULTS: The difference between the groups with regard to DASH score, ability, and time of return to job, satisfaction with the operation, and range of motions was not statistically significant (P>0.05). All of the patients had experienced functional improvement and overall satisfaction rate was 95%. No complication directly attributable to the operation was noted, except for proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture in three patents. CONCLUSION: The tendon transfer for irreversible radial nerve palsy is very successful and probably the success is not related to type of tendon used for transfer. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3227362/ /pubmed/22144751 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.87133 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moussavi, Alia Ayatollahi
Saied, Alireza
Karbalaeikhani, Ali
Outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis: Comparison of three methods
title Outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis: Comparison of three methods
title_full Outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis: Comparison of three methods
title_fullStr Outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis: Comparison of three methods
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis: Comparison of three methods
title_short Outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis: Comparison of three methods
title_sort outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis: comparison of three methods
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22144751
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.87133
work_keys_str_mv AT moussavialiaayatollahi outcomeoftendontransferforradialnerveparalysiscomparisonofthreemethods
AT saiedalireza outcomeoftendontransferforradialnerveparalysiscomparisonofthreemethods
AT karbalaeikhaniali outcomeoftendontransferforradialnerveparalysiscomparisonofthreemethods