Cargando…

The prevalence of injection-site reactions with disease-modifying therapies and their effect on adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Interferon beta (IFNβ) and glatiramer acetate (GA) are administered by subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) injection. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) often report injection-site reactions (ISRs) as a reason for noncompliance or switching therapies. The aim of this study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beer, Karsten, Müller, Martin, Hew-Winzeler, Anna Marie, Bont, Adriano, Maire, Philippe, You, Xiaojun, Foulds, Pamela, Mårlind, Jessica, Curtius, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22074056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-144
_version_ 1782217767077806080
author Beer, Karsten
Müller, Martin
Hew-Winzeler, Anna Marie
Bont, Adriano
Maire, Philippe
You, Xiaojun
Foulds, Pamela
Mårlind, Jessica
Curtius, Daniela
author_facet Beer, Karsten
Müller, Martin
Hew-Winzeler, Anna Marie
Bont, Adriano
Maire, Philippe
You, Xiaojun
Foulds, Pamela
Mårlind, Jessica
Curtius, Daniela
author_sort Beer, Karsten
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interferon beta (IFNβ) and glatiramer acetate (GA) are administered by subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) injection. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) often report injection-site reactions (ISRs) as a reason for noncompliance or switching therapies. The aim of this study was to compare the proportion of patients on different formulations of IFNβ or GA who experienced ISRs and who switched or discontinued therapy because of ISRs. METHODS: The Swiss MS Skin Project was an observational multicenter study. Patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome who were on the same therapy for at least 2 years were enrolled. A skin examination was conducted at the first study visit and 1 year later. RESULTS: The 412 patients enrolled were on 1 of 4 disease-modifying therapies for at least 2 years: IM IFNβ-1a (n = 82), SC IFNβ-1b (n = 123), SC IFNβ-1a (n = 184), or SC GA (n = 23). At first evaluation, ISRs were reported by fewer patients on IM IFNβ-1a (13.4%) than on SC IFNβ-1b (57.7%; P < 0.0001), SC IFNβ-1a (67.9%; P < 0.0001), or SC GA (30.4%; P = not significant [NS]). No patient on IM IFNβ-1a missed a dose in the previous 4 weeks because of ISRs, compared with 5.7% of patients on SC IFNβ-1b (P = 0.044), 7.1% of patients on SC IFNβ-1a (P = 0.011), and 4.3% of patients on SC GA (P = NS). Primary reasons for discontinuing or switching therapy were ISRs or lack of efficacy. Similar patterns were observed at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on IM IFNβ-1a had fewer ISRs and were less likely to switch therapies than patients on other therapies. This study may have implications in selecting initial therapy or, for patients considering switching or discontinuing therapy because of ISRs, selecting an alternative option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3227610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32276102011-12-01 The prevalence of injection-site reactions with disease-modifying therapies and their effect on adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis: an observational study Beer, Karsten Müller, Martin Hew-Winzeler, Anna Marie Bont, Adriano Maire, Philippe You, Xiaojun Foulds, Pamela Mårlind, Jessica Curtius, Daniela BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Interferon beta (IFNβ) and glatiramer acetate (GA) are administered by subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) injection. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) often report injection-site reactions (ISRs) as a reason for noncompliance or switching therapies. The aim of this study was to compare the proportion of patients on different formulations of IFNβ or GA who experienced ISRs and who switched or discontinued therapy because of ISRs. METHODS: The Swiss MS Skin Project was an observational multicenter study. Patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome who were on the same therapy for at least 2 years were enrolled. A skin examination was conducted at the first study visit and 1 year later. RESULTS: The 412 patients enrolled were on 1 of 4 disease-modifying therapies for at least 2 years: IM IFNβ-1a (n = 82), SC IFNβ-1b (n = 123), SC IFNβ-1a (n = 184), or SC GA (n = 23). At first evaluation, ISRs were reported by fewer patients on IM IFNβ-1a (13.4%) than on SC IFNβ-1b (57.7%; P < 0.0001), SC IFNβ-1a (67.9%; P < 0.0001), or SC GA (30.4%; P = not significant [NS]). No patient on IM IFNβ-1a missed a dose in the previous 4 weeks because of ISRs, compared with 5.7% of patients on SC IFNβ-1b (P = 0.044), 7.1% of patients on SC IFNβ-1a (P = 0.011), and 4.3% of patients on SC GA (P = NS). Primary reasons for discontinuing or switching therapy were ISRs or lack of efficacy. Similar patterns were observed at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on IM IFNβ-1a had fewer ISRs and were less likely to switch therapies than patients on other therapies. This study may have implications in selecting initial therapy or, for patients considering switching or discontinuing therapy because of ISRs, selecting an alternative option. BioMed Central 2011-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3227610/ /pubmed/22074056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-144 Text en Copyright ©2011 Beer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Beer, Karsten
Müller, Martin
Hew-Winzeler, Anna Marie
Bont, Adriano
Maire, Philippe
You, Xiaojun
Foulds, Pamela
Mårlind, Jessica
Curtius, Daniela
The prevalence of injection-site reactions with disease-modifying therapies and their effect on adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title The prevalence of injection-site reactions with disease-modifying therapies and their effect on adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title_full The prevalence of injection-site reactions with disease-modifying therapies and their effect on adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title_fullStr The prevalence of injection-site reactions with disease-modifying therapies and their effect on adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of injection-site reactions with disease-modifying therapies and their effect on adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title_short The prevalence of injection-site reactions with disease-modifying therapies and their effect on adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title_sort prevalence of injection-site reactions with disease-modifying therapies and their effect on adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis: an observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22074056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-144
work_keys_str_mv AT beerkarsten theprevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT mullermartin theprevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT hewwinzelerannamarie theprevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT bontadriano theprevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT mairephilippe theprevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT youxiaojun theprevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT fouldspamela theprevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT marlindjessica theprevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT curtiusdaniela theprevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT beerkarsten prevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT mullermartin prevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT hewwinzelerannamarie prevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT bontadriano prevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT mairephilippe prevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT youxiaojun prevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT fouldspamela prevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT marlindjessica prevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT curtiusdaniela prevalenceofinjectionsitereactionswithdiseasemodifyingtherapiesandtheireffectonadherenceinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy