Cargando…
Quality of Life in Hormone Receptor–Positive HER-2(+) Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment with Letrozole Alone or in Combination with Lapatinib
BACKGROUND. A phase III trial compared lapatinib plus letrozole (L + Let) with letrozole plus placebo (Let) as first-line therapy for hormone receptor (HR)(+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients whose tumors were human epiderma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AlphaMed Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20798196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0012 |
_version_ | 1782217798665109504 |
---|---|
author | Sherrill, Beth Amonkar, Mayur M. Sherif, Bintu Maltzman, Julie O'Rourke, Lisa Johnston, Stephen |
author_facet | Sherrill, Beth Amonkar, Mayur M. Sherif, Bintu Maltzman, Julie O'Rourke, Lisa Johnston, Stephen |
author_sort | Sherrill, Beth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND. A phase III trial compared lapatinib plus letrozole (L + Let) with letrozole plus placebo (Let) as first-line therapy for hormone receptor (HR)(+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients whose tumors were human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2(+) was significantly longer for L + Let than for Let (8.2 months versus 3 months; p = .019). This analysis focuses on quality of life (QOL) in the HER-2(+) population. METHODS. QOL was assessed at screening, every 12 weeks, and at withdrawal using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast (FACT–B). Changes from baseline were analyzed and the proportions of patients achieving minimally important differences in QOL scores were compared. Additional exploratory analyses evaluated how QOL changes reflected tumor progression status. RESULTS. Among the 1,286 patients randomized, 219 had HER-2(+) tumors. Baseline QOL scores were comparable in the two arms. Mean changes in QOL scores were generally stable over time for patients who stayed on study. The average change from baseline on the FACT-B total score in both arms was positive at all scheduled visits through week 48. There was no significant difference between the two treatment arms in the percentage of QOL responders. CONCLUSION. The addition of lapatinib to letrozole led to a significantly longer PFS interval while maintaining QOL during treatment, when compared with letrozole alone, thus confirming the clinical benefit of the combination therapy in the HR(+) HER-2(+) MBC patient population. This all oral regimen provides an effective option in this patient population, delaying the need for chemotherapy and its accompanying side effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3228031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | AlphaMed Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32280312012-04-25 Quality of Life in Hormone Receptor–Positive HER-2(+) Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment with Letrozole Alone or in Combination with Lapatinib Sherrill, Beth Amonkar, Mayur M. Sherif, Bintu Maltzman, Julie O'Rourke, Lisa Johnston, Stephen Oncologist Academia–Pharma Intersect BACKGROUND. A phase III trial compared lapatinib plus letrozole (L + Let) with letrozole plus placebo (Let) as first-line therapy for hormone receptor (HR)(+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients whose tumors were human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2(+) was significantly longer for L + Let than for Let (8.2 months versus 3 months; p = .019). This analysis focuses on quality of life (QOL) in the HER-2(+) population. METHODS. QOL was assessed at screening, every 12 weeks, and at withdrawal using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast (FACT–B). Changes from baseline were analyzed and the proportions of patients achieving minimally important differences in QOL scores were compared. Additional exploratory analyses evaluated how QOL changes reflected tumor progression status. RESULTS. Among the 1,286 patients randomized, 219 had HER-2(+) tumors. Baseline QOL scores were comparable in the two arms. Mean changes in QOL scores were generally stable over time for patients who stayed on study. The average change from baseline on the FACT-B total score in both arms was positive at all scheduled visits through week 48. There was no significant difference between the two treatment arms in the percentage of QOL responders. CONCLUSION. The addition of lapatinib to letrozole led to a significantly longer PFS interval while maintaining QOL during treatment, when compared with letrozole alone, thus confirming the clinical benefit of the combination therapy in the HR(+) HER-2(+) MBC patient population. This all oral regimen provides an effective option in this patient population, delaying the need for chemotherapy and its accompanying side effects. AlphaMed Press 2010-09 2010-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3228031/ /pubmed/20798196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0012 Text en ©AlphaMed Press available online without subscription through the open access option. |
spellingShingle | Academia–Pharma Intersect Sherrill, Beth Amonkar, Mayur M. Sherif, Bintu Maltzman, Julie O'Rourke, Lisa Johnston, Stephen Quality of Life in Hormone Receptor–Positive HER-2(+) Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment with Letrozole Alone or in Combination with Lapatinib |
title | Quality of Life in Hormone Receptor–Positive HER-2(+) Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment with Letrozole Alone or in Combination with Lapatinib |
title_full | Quality of Life in Hormone Receptor–Positive HER-2(+) Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment with Letrozole Alone or in Combination with Lapatinib |
title_fullStr | Quality of Life in Hormone Receptor–Positive HER-2(+) Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment with Letrozole Alone or in Combination with Lapatinib |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of Life in Hormone Receptor–Positive HER-2(+) Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment with Letrozole Alone or in Combination with Lapatinib |
title_short | Quality of Life in Hormone Receptor–Positive HER-2(+) Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment with Letrozole Alone or in Combination with Lapatinib |
title_sort | quality of life in hormone receptor–positive her-2(+) metastatic breast cancer patients during treatment with letrozole alone or in combination with lapatinib |
topic | Academia–Pharma Intersect |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20798196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sherrillbeth qualityoflifeinhormonereceptorpositiveher2metastaticbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentwithletrozolealoneorincombinationwithlapatinib AT amonkarmayurm qualityoflifeinhormonereceptorpositiveher2metastaticbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentwithletrozolealoneorincombinationwithlapatinib AT sherifbintu qualityoflifeinhormonereceptorpositiveher2metastaticbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentwithletrozolealoneorincombinationwithlapatinib AT maltzmanjulie qualityoflifeinhormonereceptorpositiveher2metastaticbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentwithletrozolealoneorincombinationwithlapatinib AT orourkelisa qualityoflifeinhormonereceptorpositiveher2metastaticbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentwithletrozolealoneorincombinationwithlapatinib AT johnstonstephen qualityoflifeinhormonereceptorpositiveher2metastaticbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentwithletrozolealoneorincombinationwithlapatinib |