Cargando…

Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory

This work describes the experience at a tuberculosis clinical laboratory where relatively new TB diagnosis technologies; nucleic acid detection of two target strands, IS6110 and devR, by PCR and microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) were used. The LJ culture was the gold standard. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mashta, Anita, Mishra, Pooja, Philipose, Sonia, Tamilzhalagan, S, Mahmud, Hanif, Bhaskar, Sangeeta, Upadhyay, Pramod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22093248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-10-16
_version_ 1782217842986319872
author Mashta, Anita
Mishra, Pooja
Philipose, Sonia
Tamilzhalagan, S
Mahmud, Hanif
Bhaskar, Sangeeta
Upadhyay, Pramod
author_facet Mashta, Anita
Mishra, Pooja
Philipose, Sonia
Tamilzhalagan, S
Mahmud, Hanif
Bhaskar, Sangeeta
Upadhyay, Pramod
author_sort Mashta, Anita
collection PubMed
description This work describes the experience at a tuberculosis clinical laboratory where relatively new TB diagnosis technologies; nucleic acid detection of two target strands, IS6110 and devR, by PCR and microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) were used. The LJ culture was the gold standard. This evaluation was done from August 2007 to July 2009 on 463 sputum samples of tuberculosis suspects at a specialized tuberculosis clinic in Delhi, India. None of the tests we evaluated can accurately detect the presence or absence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in all the samples and smear microscopy was found to be the most reliable assay in this study. The PCR assay could detect down to 2 pg of H37Rv DNA. Sensitivity, specificity was 0.40, 0.60 and 0.19, 0.81 for smear positive (n = 228) and negative samples (n = 235) respectively. In the MODS assay, sensitivity, specificity of 0.48, 0.52 and 0.38, 0.76 was observed for smear positive and negative samples. Sputum smear microscopy had sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.70.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3228662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32286622011-12-02 Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory Mashta, Anita Mishra, Pooja Philipose, Sonia Tamilzhalagan, S Mahmud, Hanif Bhaskar, Sangeeta Upadhyay, Pramod J Negat Results Biomed Research This work describes the experience at a tuberculosis clinical laboratory where relatively new TB diagnosis technologies; nucleic acid detection of two target strands, IS6110 and devR, by PCR and microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) were used. The LJ culture was the gold standard. This evaluation was done from August 2007 to July 2009 on 463 sputum samples of tuberculosis suspects at a specialized tuberculosis clinic in Delhi, India. None of the tests we evaluated can accurately detect the presence or absence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in all the samples and smear microscopy was found to be the most reliable assay in this study. The PCR assay could detect down to 2 pg of H37Rv DNA. Sensitivity, specificity was 0.40, 0.60 and 0.19, 0.81 for smear positive (n = 228) and negative samples (n = 235) respectively. In the MODS assay, sensitivity, specificity of 0.48, 0.52 and 0.38, 0.76 was observed for smear positive and negative samples. Sputum smear microscopy had sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.70. BioMed Central 2011-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3228662/ /pubmed/22093248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-10-16 Text en Copyright ©2011 Mashta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mashta, Anita
Mishra, Pooja
Philipose, Sonia
Tamilzhalagan, S
Mahmud, Hanif
Bhaskar, Sangeeta
Upadhyay, Pramod
Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory
title Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory
title_full Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory
title_fullStr Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory
title_short Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory
title_sort diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22093248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-10-16
work_keys_str_mv AT mashtaanita diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory
AT mishrapooja diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory
AT philiposesonia diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory
AT tamilzhalagans diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory
AT mahmudhanif diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory
AT bhaskarsangeeta diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory
AT upadhyaypramod diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory