Cargando…
Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory
This work describes the experience at a tuberculosis clinical laboratory where relatively new TB diagnosis technologies; nucleic acid detection of two target strands, IS6110 and devR, by PCR and microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) were used. The LJ culture was the gold standard. This...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22093248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-10-16 |
_version_ | 1782217842986319872 |
---|---|
author | Mashta, Anita Mishra, Pooja Philipose, Sonia Tamilzhalagan, S Mahmud, Hanif Bhaskar, Sangeeta Upadhyay, Pramod |
author_facet | Mashta, Anita Mishra, Pooja Philipose, Sonia Tamilzhalagan, S Mahmud, Hanif Bhaskar, Sangeeta Upadhyay, Pramod |
author_sort | Mashta, Anita |
collection | PubMed |
description | This work describes the experience at a tuberculosis clinical laboratory where relatively new TB diagnosis technologies; nucleic acid detection of two target strands, IS6110 and devR, by PCR and microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) were used. The LJ culture was the gold standard. This evaluation was done from August 2007 to July 2009 on 463 sputum samples of tuberculosis suspects at a specialized tuberculosis clinic in Delhi, India. None of the tests we evaluated can accurately detect the presence or absence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in all the samples and smear microscopy was found to be the most reliable assay in this study. The PCR assay could detect down to 2 pg of H37Rv DNA. Sensitivity, specificity was 0.40, 0.60 and 0.19, 0.81 for smear positive (n = 228) and negative samples (n = 235) respectively. In the MODS assay, sensitivity, specificity of 0.48, 0.52 and 0.38, 0.76 was observed for smear positive and negative samples. Sputum smear microscopy had sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.70. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3228662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32286622011-12-02 Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory Mashta, Anita Mishra, Pooja Philipose, Sonia Tamilzhalagan, S Mahmud, Hanif Bhaskar, Sangeeta Upadhyay, Pramod J Negat Results Biomed Research This work describes the experience at a tuberculosis clinical laboratory where relatively new TB diagnosis technologies; nucleic acid detection of two target strands, IS6110 and devR, by PCR and microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) were used. The LJ culture was the gold standard. This evaluation was done from August 2007 to July 2009 on 463 sputum samples of tuberculosis suspects at a specialized tuberculosis clinic in Delhi, India. None of the tests we evaluated can accurately detect the presence or absence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in all the samples and smear microscopy was found to be the most reliable assay in this study. The PCR assay could detect down to 2 pg of H37Rv DNA. Sensitivity, specificity was 0.40, 0.60 and 0.19, 0.81 for smear positive (n = 228) and negative samples (n = 235) respectively. In the MODS assay, sensitivity, specificity of 0.48, 0.52 and 0.38, 0.76 was observed for smear positive and negative samples. Sputum smear microscopy had sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.70. BioMed Central 2011-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3228662/ /pubmed/22093248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-10-16 Text en Copyright ©2011 Mashta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Mashta, Anita Mishra, Pooja Philipose, Sonia Tamilzhalagan, S Mahmud, Hanif Bhaskar, Sangeeta Upadhyay, Pramod Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory |
title | Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory |
title_full | Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory |
title_fullStr | Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory |
title_short | Diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory |
title_sort | diagnosis of tuberculosis: the experience at a specialized diagnostic laboratory |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22093248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-10-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mashtaanita diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory AT mishrapooja diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory AT philiposesonia diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory AT tamilzhalagans diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory AT mahmudhanif diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory AT bhaskarsangeeta diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory AT upadhyaypramod diagnosisoftuberculosistheexperienceataspecializeddiagnosticlaboratory |