Cargando…

Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women

BACKGROUND: During pregnancy, malaria infection with Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax is related to adverse maternal health and poor birth outcomes. Diagnosis of malaria, during pregnancy, is complicated by the absence or low parasite densities in peripheral blood. Diagnostic methods, other...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kattenberg, Johanna H, Ochodo, Eleanor A, Boer, Kimberly R, Schallig, Henk DFH, Mens, Petra F, Leeflang, Mariska MG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22035448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-321
_version_ 1782217884995420160
author Kattenberg, Johanna H
Ochodo, Eleanor A
Boer, Kimberly R
Schallig, Henk DFH
Mens, Petra F
Leeflang, Mariska MG
author_facet Kattenberg, Johanna H
Ochodo, Eleanor A
Boer, Kimberly R
Schallig, Henk DFH
Mens, Petra F
Leeflang, Mariska MG
author_sort Kattenberg, Johanna H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During pregnancy, malaria infection with Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax is related to adverse maternal health and poor birth outcomes. Diagnosis of malaria, during pregnancy, is complicated by the absence or low parasite densities in peripheral blood. Diagnostic methods, other than microscopy, are needed for detection of placental malaria. Therefore, the diagnostic accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), detecting antigen, and molecular techniques (PCR), detecting DNA, for the diagnosis of Plasmodium infections in pregnancy was systematically reviewed. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of RDTs, PCR, microscopy of peripheral and placental blood and placental histology for the detection of malaria infection (all species) in pregnant women. RESULTS: The results of 49 studies were analysed in metandi (Stata), of which the majority described P. falciparum infections. Although both placental and peripheral blood microscopy cannot reliably replace histology as a reference standard for placental P. falciparum infection, many studies compared RDTs and PCR to these tests. The proportion of microscopy positives in placental blood (sensitivity) detected by peripheral blood microscopy, RDTs and PCR are respectively 72% [95% CI 62-80], 81% [95% CI 55-93] and 94% [95% CI 86-98]. The proportion of placental blood microscopy negative women that were negative in peripheral blood microscopy, RDTs and PCR (specificity) are 98% [95% CI 95-99], 94% [95% CI 76-99] and 77% [95% CI 71-82]. Based on the current data, it was not possible to determine if the false positives in RDTs and PCR are caused by sequestered parasites in the placenta that are not detected by placental microscopy. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that RDTs and PCR may have good performance characteristics to serve as alternatives for the diagnosis of malaria in pregnancy, besides any other limitations and practical considerations concerning the use of these tests. Nevertheless, more studies with placental histology as reference test are urgently required to reliably determine the accuracy of RDTs and PCR for the diagnosis of placental malaria. P. vivax-infections have been neglected in diagnostic test accuracy studies of malaria in pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3228868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32288682011-12-03 Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women Kattenberg, Johanna H Ochodo, Eleanor A Boer, Kimberly R Schallig, Henk DFH Mens, Petra F Leeflang, Mariska MG Malar J Review BACKGROUND: During pregnancy, malaria infection with Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax is related to adverse maternal health and poor birth outcomes. Diagnosis of malaria, during pregnancy, is complicated by the absence or low parasite densities in peripheral blood. Diagnostic methods, other than microscopy, are needed for detection of placental malaria. Therefore, the diagnostic accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), detecting antigen, and molecular techniques (PCR), detecting DNA, for the diagnosis of Plasmodium infections in pregnancy was systematically reviewed. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of RDTs, PCR, microscopy of peripheral and placental blood and placental histology for the detection of malaria infection (all species) in pregnant women. RESULTS: The results of 49 studies were analysed in metandi (Stata), of which the majority described P. falciparum infections. Although both placental and peripheral blood microscopy cannot reliably replace histology as a reference standard for placental P. falciparum infection, many studies compared RDTs and PCR to these tests. The proportion of microscopy positives in placental blood (sensitivity) detected by peripheral blood microscopy, RDTs and PCR are respectively 72% [95% CI 62-80], 81% [95% CI 55-93] and 94% [95% CI 86-98]. The proportion of placental blood microscopy negative women that were negative in peripheral blood microscopy, RDTs and PCR (specificity) are 98% [95% CI 95-99], 94% [95% CI 76-99] and 77% [95% CI 71-82]. Based on the current data, it was not possible to determine if the false positives in RDTs and PCR are caused by sequestered parasites in the placenta that are not detected by placental microscopy. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that RDTs and PCR may have good performance characteristics to serve as alternatives for the diagnosis of malaria in pregnancy, besides any other limitations and practical considerations concerning the use of these tests. Nevertheless, more studies with placental histology as reference test are urgently required to reliably determine the accuracy of RDTs and PCR for the diagnosis of placental malaria. P. vivax-infections have been neglected in diagnostic test accuracy studies of malaria in pregnancy. BioMed Central 2011-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3228868/ /pubmed/22035448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-321 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kattenberg et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Kattenberg, Johanna H
Ochodo, Eleanor A
Boer, Kimberly R
Schallig, Henk DFH
Mens, Petra F
Leeflang, Mariska MG
Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women
title Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women
title_full Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women
title_short Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and pcr for malaria in pregnant women
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22035448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-321
work_keys_str_mv AT kattenbergjohannah systematicreviewandmetaanalysisrapiddiagnostictestsversusplacentalhistologymicroscopyandpcrformalariainpregnantwomen
AT ochodoeleanora systematicreviewandmetaanalysisrapiddiagnostictestsversusplacentalhistologymicroscopyandpcrformalariainpregnantwomen
AT boerkimberlyr systematicreviewandmetaanalysisrapiddiagnostictestsversusplacentalhistologymicroscopyandpcrformalariainpregnantwomen
AT schallighenkdfh systematicreviewandmetaanalysisrapiddiagnostictestsversusplacentalhistologymicroscopyandpcrformalariainpregnantwomen
AT menspetraf systematicreviewandmetaanalysisrapiddiagnostictestsversusplacentalhistologymicroscopyandpcrformalariainpregnantwomen
AT leeflangmariskamg systematicreviewandmetaanalysisrapiddiagnostictestsversusplacentalhistologymicroscopyandpcrformalariainpregnantwomen