Cargando…

Range of motion implications of proximal humerus fractures: a case study

BACKGROUND: Functional outcome in surgical treatment of Neer three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures (PHF) varies greatly and depends on multiple parameters. Important parameters are the amount and direction of displacement and the necessary reduction of fragments during surgery. These are p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vochteloo, Anne J. H., Krekel, Peter R., van de Sande, Michiel A. J., Nagels, Jochem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22207882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12570-011-0080-8
_version_ 1782217892734959616
author Vochteloo, Anne J. H.
Krekel, Peter R.
van de Sande, Michiel A. J.
Nagels, Jochem
author_facet Vochteloo, Anne J. H.
Krekel, Peter R.
van de Sande, Michiel A. J.
Nagels, Jochem
author_sort Vochteloo, Anne J. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Functional outcome in surgical treatment of Neer three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures (PHF) varies greatly and depends on multiple parameters. Important parameters are the amount and direction of displacement and the necessary reduction of fragments during surgery. These are patient-specific parameters and are difficult to determine using traditional modalities such as radiographs and computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A 58-year-old female patient was reported in the emergency department with a three-part PHF. CT scan images showed that the humeral shaft was medialised and internally rotated, but with a marginally displaced greater tuberosity fragment. Using a bone-determined range of motion (ROM) simulation system, we analysed the CT scan and calculated the required correction needed to prevent post-operative impingement. The fracture was reduced and stabilised by a locking plate, realigning the medialised and internally rotated humeral shaft. The post-operative bone-determined ROM was determined using a post-operative CT scan and the motion simulation system. RESULTS: ROM limitations due to bony impingement visible in the simulations of the pre-operative CT scan had mostly disappeared in the simulations of the post-operative CT scan. Twelve weeks post-surgery the patient has regained close to 80% of her ROM. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates the applicability of a new diagnostic tool that can be used to identify bony impingement and helps in making the decision for conservative or surgical treatment of a PHF. The simulation of post-trauma function was indicative of functional outcome. This supports our claim that the system may be used to facilitate the treatment decision regarding PHF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3228961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32289612011-12-27 Range of motion implications of proximal humerus fractures: a case study Vochteloo, Anne J. H. Krekel, Peter R. van de Sande, Michiel A. J. Nagels, Jochem Eur Orthop Traumatol Case Report BACKGROUND: Functional outcome in surgical treatment of Neer three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures (PHF) varies greatly and depends on multiple parameters. Important parameters are the amount and direction of displacement and the necessary reduction of fragments during surgery. These are patient-specific parameters and are difficult to determine using traditional modalities such as radiographs and computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A 58-year-old female patient was reported in the emergency department with a three-part PHF. CT scan images showed that the humeral shaft was medialised and internally rotated, but with a marginally displaced greater tuberosity fragment. Using a bone-determined range of motion (ROM) simulation system, we analysed the CT scan and calculated the required correction needed to prevent post-operative impingement. The fracture was reduced and stabilised by a locking plate, realigning the medialised and internally rotated humeral shaft. The post-operative bone-determined ROM was determined using a post-operative CT scan and the motion simulation system. RESULTS: ROM limitations due to bony impingement visible in the simulations of the pre-operative CT scan had mostly disappeared in the simulations of the post-operative CT scan. Twelve weeks post-surgery the patient has regained close to 80% of her ROM. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates the applicability of a new diagnostic tool that can be used to identify bony impingement and helps in making the decision for conservative or surgical treatment of a PHF. The simulation of post-trauma function was indicative of functional outcome. This supports our claim that the system may be used to facilitate the treatment decision regarding PHF. Springer-Verlag 2011-11-16 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3228961/ /pubmed/22207882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12570-011-0080-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Vochteloo, Anne J. H.
Krekel, Peter R.
van de Sande, Michiel A. J.
Nagels, Jochem
Range of motion implications of proximal humerus fractures: a case study
title Range of motion implications of proximal humerus fractures: a case study
title_full Range of motion implications of proximal humerus fractures: a case study
title_fullStr Range of motion implications of proximal humerus fractures: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Range of motion implications of proximal humerus fractures: a case study
title_short Range of motion implications of proximal humerus fractures: a case study
title_sort range of motion implications of proximal humerus fractures: a case study
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22207882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12570-011-0080-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vochtelooannejh rangeofmotionimplicationsofproximalhumerusfracturesacasestudy
AT krekelpeterr rangeofmotionimplicationsofproximalhumerusfracturesacasestudy
AT vandesandemichielaj rangeofmotionimplicationsofproximalhumerusfracturesacasestudy
AT nagelsjochem rangeofmotionimplicationsofproximalhumerusfracturesacasestudy