Cargando…

Costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions - a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The control and elimination of malaria requires expanded coverage of and access to effective malaria control interventions such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), intermittent preventive treatment (IPT), diagnostic testing and appropriate treatment. Decis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Michael T, Conteh, Lesong, Cibulskis, Richard, Ghani, Azra C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3229472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22050911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-337
_version_ 1782217943870865408
author White, Michael T
Conteh, Lesong
Cibulskis, Richard
Ghani, Azra C
author_facet White, Michael T
Conteh, Lesong
Cibulskis, Richard
Ghani, Azra C
author_sort White, Michael T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The control and elimination of malaria requires expanded coverage of and access to effective malaria control interventions such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), intermittent preventive treatment (IPT), diagnostic testing and appropriate treatment. Decisions on how to scale up the coverage of these interventions need to be based on evidence of programme effectiveness, equity and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic review of the published literature on the costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria interventions was undertaken. All costs and cost-effectiveness ratios were inflated to 2009 USD to allow comparison of the costs and benefits of several different interventions through various delivery channels, across different geographical regions and from varying costing perspectives. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies of the costs and forty three studies of the cost-effectiveness of malaria interventions were identified, 78% of which were undertaken in sub-Saharan Africa, 18% in Asia and 4% in South America. The median financial cost of protecting one person for one year was $2.20 (range $0.88-$9.54) for ITNs, $6.70 (range $2.22-$12.85) for IRS, $0.60 (range $0.48-$1.08) for IPT in infants, $4.03 (range $1.25-$11.80) for IPT in children, and $2.06 (range $0.47-$3.36) for IPT in pregnant women. The median financial cost of diagnosing a case of malaria was $4.32 (range $0.34-$9.34). The median financial cost of treating an episode of uncomplicated malaria was $5.84 (range $2.36-$23.65) and the median financial cost of treating an episode of severe malaria was $30.26 (range $15.64-$137.87). Economies of scale were observed in the implementation of ITNs, IRS and IPT, with lower unit costs reported in studies with larger numbers of beneficiaries. From a provider perspective, the median incremental cost effectiveness ratio per disability adjusted life year averted was $27 (range $8.15-$110) for ITNs, $143 (range $135-$150) for IRS, and $24 (range $1.08-$44.24) for IPT. CONCLUSIONS: A transparent evidence base on the costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions is provided to inform rational resource allocation by donors and domestic health budgets and the selection of optimal packages of interventions by malaria control programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3229472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32294722011-12-03 Costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions - a systematic review White, Michael T Conteh, Lesong Cibulskis, Richard Ghani, Azra C Malar J Review BACKGROUND: The control and elimination of malaria requires expanded coverage of and access to effective malaria control interventions such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), intermittent preventive treatment (IPT), diagnostic testing and appropriate treatment. Decisions on how to scale up the coverage of these interventions need to be based on evidence of programme effectiveness, equity and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic review of the published literature on the costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria interventions was undertaken. All costs and cost-effectiveness ratios were inflated to 2009 USD to allow comparison of the costs and benefits of several different interventions through various delivery channels, across different geographical regions and from varying costing perspectives. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies of the costs and forty three studies of the cost-effectiveness of malaria interventions were identified, 78% of which were undertaken in sub-Saharan Africa, 18% in Asia and 4% in South America. The median financial cost of protecting one person for one year was $2.20 (range $0.88-$9.54) for ITNs, $6.70 (range $2.22-$12.85) for IRS, $0.60 (range $0.48-$1.08) for IPT in infants, $4.03 (range $1.25-$11.80) for IPT in children, and $2.06 (range $0.47-$3.36) for IPT in pregnant women. The median financial cost of diagnosing a case of malaria was $4.32 (range $0.34-$9.34). The median financial cost of treating an episode of uncomplicated malaria was $5.84 (range $2.36-$23.65) and the median financial cost of treating an episode of severe malaria was $30.26 (range $15.64-$137.87). Economies of scale were observed in the implementation of ITNs, IRS and IPT, with lower unit costs reported in studies with larger numbers of beneficiaries. From a provider perspective, the median incremental cost effectiveness ratio per disability adjusted life year averted was $27 (range $8.15-$110) for ITNs, $143 (range $135-$150) for IRS, and $24 (range $1.08-$44.24) for IPT. CONCLUSIONS: A transparent evidence base on the costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions is provided to inform rational resource allocation by donors and domestic health budgets and the selection of optimal packages of interventions by malaria control programmes. BioMed Central 2011-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3229472/ /pubmed/22050911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-337 Text en Copyright ©2011 White et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
White, Michael T
Conteh, Lesong
Cibulskis, Richard
Ghani, Azra C
Costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions - a systematic review
title Costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions - a systematic review
title_full Costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions - a systematic review
title_fullStr Costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions - a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions - a systematic review
title_short Costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions - a systematic review
title_sort costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions - a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3229472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22050911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-337
work_keys_str_mv AT whitemichaelt costsandcosteffectivenessofmalariacontrolinterventionsasystematicreview
AT contehlesong costsandcosteffectivenessofmalariacontrolinterventionsasystematicreview
AT cibulskisrichard costsandcosteffectivenessofmalariacontrolinterventionsasystematicreview
AT ghaniazrac costsandcosteffectivenessofmalariacontrolinterventionsasystematicreview