Cargando…
Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews with meta-analyses often contain many statistical tests. This multiplicity may increase the risk of type I error. Few attempts have been made to address the problem of statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews. Before the implications are properly considered, the...
Autores principales: | Imberger, Georgina, Vejlby, Alexandra Damgaard, Hansen, Sara Bohnstedt, Møller, Ann M., Wetterslev, Jørn |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3229598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22164288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028422 |
Ejemplares similares
-
False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review
por: Imberger, Georgina, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
por: McKenzie, Joanne E, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Alexander Cochran
Publicado: (1924) -
Cochrane Pflegeforum
por: Legenstein, Karin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)