Cargando…

Mislocalization of Visual Stimuli: Independent Effects of Static and Dynamic Attention

Shifts of visual attention cause systematic distortions of the perceived locations of visual objects around the focus of attention. In the attention repulsion effect, the perceived location of a visual target is shifted away from an attention-attracting cue when the cue is presented before the targe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chien, Sung-en, Ono, Fuminori, Watanabe, Katsumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3230626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22163009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028371
_version_ 1782218083562160128
author Chien, Sung-en
Ono, Fuminori
Watanabe, Katsumi
author_facet Chien, Sung-en
Ono, Fuminori
Watanabe, Katsumi
author_sort Chien, Sung-en
collection PubMed
description Shifts of visual attention cause systematic distortions of the perceived locations of visual objects around the focus of attention. In the attention repulsion effect, the perceived location of a visual target is shifted away from an attention-attracting cue when the cue is presented before the target. Recently it has been found that, if the visual cue is presented after the target, the perceived location of the target shifts toward the location of the following cue. One unanswered question is whether a single mechanism underlies both attentional repulsion and attraction effects. We presented participants with two disks at diagonal locations as visual cues and two vertical lines as targets. Participants were asked to perform a forced-choice task to judge targets' positions. The present study examined whether the magnitude of the repulsion effect and the attraction effect would differ (Experiment 1), whether the two effects would interact (Experiment 2), and whether the location or the dynamic shift of attentional focus would determine the distortions effects (Experiment 3). The results showed that the effect size of the attraction effect was slightly larger than the repulsion effect and the preceding and following cues have independent influences on the perceived positions. The repulsion effect was caused by the location of attnetion and the attraction effect was due to the dynamic shift of attentional focus, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms for the retrospective attraction effect might be different from those for the repulsion effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3230626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32306262011-12-09 Mislocalization of Visual Stimuli: Independent Effects of Static and Dynamic Attention Chien, Sung-en Ono, Fuminori Watanabe, Katsumi PLoS One Research Article Shifts of visual attention cause systematic distortions of the perceived locations of visual objects around the focus of attention. In the attention repulsion effect, the perceived location of a visual target is shifted away from an attention-attracting cue when the cue is presented before the target. Recently it has been found that, if the visual cue is presented after the target, the perceived location of the target shifts toward the location of the following cue. One unanswered question is whether a single mechanism underlies both attentional repulsion and attraction effects. We presented participants with two disks at diagonal locations as visual cues and two vertical lines as targets. Participants were asked to perform a forced-choice task to judge targets' positions. The present study examined whether the magnitude of the repulsion effect and the attraction effect would differ (Experiment 1), whether the two effects would interact (Experiment 2), and whether the location or the dynamic shift of attentional focus would determine the distortions effects (Experiment 3). The results showed that the effect size of the attraction effect was slightly larger than the repulsion effect and the preceding and following cues have independent influences on the perceived positions. The repulsion effect was caused by the location of attnetion and the attraction effect was due to the dynamic shift of attentional focus, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms for the retrospective attraction effect might be different from those for the repulsion effect. Public Library of Science 2011-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3230626/ /pubmed/22163009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028371 Text en Chien et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chien, Sung-en
Ono, Fuminori
Watanabe, Katsumi
Mislocalization of Visual Stimuli: Independent Effects of Static and Dynamic Attention
title Mislocalization of Visual Stimuli: Independent Effects of Static and Dynamic Attention
title_full Mislocalization of Visual Stimuli: Independent Effects of Static and Dynamic Attention
title_fullStr Mislocalization of Visual Stimuli: Independent Effects of Static and Dynamic Attention
title_full_unstemmed Mislocalization of Visual Stimuli: Independent Effects of Static and Dynamic Attention
title_short Mislocalization of Visual Stimuli: Independent Effects of Static and Dynamic Attention
title_sort mislocalization of visual stimuli: independent effects of static and dynamic attention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3230626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22163009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028371
work_keys_str_mv AT chiensungen mislocalizationofvisualstimuliindependenteffectsofstaticanddynamicattention
AT onofuminori mislocalizationofvisualstimuliindependenteffectsofstaticanddynamicattention
AT watanabekatsumi mislocalizationofvisualstimuliindependenteffectsofstaticanddynamicattention