Cargando…

Sensors and Clinical Mastitis—The Quest for the Perfect Alert

When cows on dairy farms are milked with an automatic milking system or in high capacity milking parlors, clinical mastitis (CM) cannot be adequately detected without sensors. The objective of this paper is to describe the performance demands of sensor systems to detect CM and evaluats the current p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hogeveen, Henk, Kamphuis, Claudia, Steeneveld, Wilma, Mollenhorst, Herman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3231225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22163637
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s100907991
_version_ 1782218172277981184
author Hogeveen, Henk
Kamphuis, Claudia
Steeneveld, Wilma
Mollenhorst, Herman
author_facet Hogeveen, Henk
Kamphuis, Claudia
Steeneveld, Wilma
Mollenhorst, Herman
author_sort Hogeveen, Henk
collection PubMed
description When cows on dairy farms are milked with an automatic milking system or in high capacity milking parlors, clinical mastitis (CM) cannot be adequately detected without sensors. The objective of this paper is to describe the performance demands of sensor systems to detect CM and evaluats the current performance of these sensor systems. Several detection models based on different sensors were studied in the past. When evaluating these models, three factors are important: performance (in terms of sensitivity and specificity), the time window and the similarity of the study data with real farm data. A CM detection system should offer at least a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 99%. The time window should not be longer than 48 hours and study circumstances should be as similar to practical farm circumstances as possible. The study design should comprise more than one farm for data collection. Since 1992, 16 peer-reviewed papers have been published with a description and evaluation of CM detection models. There is a large variation in the use of sensors and algorithms. All this makes these results not very comparable. There is a also large difference in performance between the detection models and also a large variation in time windows used and little similarity between study data. Therefore, it is difficult to compare the overall performance of the different CM detection models. The sensitivity and specificity found in the different studies could, for a large part, be explained in differences in the used time window. None of the described studies satisfied the demands for CM detection models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3231225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32312252011-12-07 Sensors and Clinical Mastitis—The Quest for the Perfect Alert Hogeveen, Henk Kamphuis, Claudia Steeneveld, Wilma Mollenhorst, Herman Sensors (Basel) Review When cows on dairy farms are milked with an automatic milking system or in high capacity milking parlors, clinical mastitis (CM) cannot be adequately detected without sensors. The objective of this paper is to describe the performance demands of sensor systems to detect CM and evaluats the current performance of these sensor systems. Several detection models based on different sensors were studied in the past. When evaluating these models, three factors are important: performance (in terms of sensitivity and specificity), the time window and the similarity of the study data with real farm data. A CM detection system should offer at least a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 99%. The time window should not be longer than 48 hours and study circumstances should be as similar to practical farm circumstances as possible. The study design should comprise more than one farm for data collection. Since 1992, 16 peer-reviewed papers have been published with a description and evaluation of CM detection models. There is a large variation in the use of sensors and algorithms. All this makes these results not very comparable. There is a also large difference in performance between the detection models and also a large variation in time windows used and little similarity between study data. Therefore, it is difficult to compare the overall performance of the different CM detection models. The sensitivity and specificity found in the different studies could, for a large part, be explained in differences in the used time window. None of the described studies satisfied the demands for CM detection models. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2010-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3231225/ /pubmed/22163637 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s100907991 Text en © 2010 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Hogeveen, Henk
Kamphuis, Claudia
Steeneveld, Wilma
Mollenhorst, Herman
Sensors and Clinical Mastitis—The Quest for the Perfect Alert
title Sensors and Clinical Mastitis—The Quest for the Perfect Alert
title_full Sensors and Clinical Mastitis—The Quest for the Perfect Alert
title_fullStr Sensors and Clinical Mastitis—The Quest for the Perfect Alert
title_full_unstemmed Sensors and Clinical Mastitis—The Quest for the Perfect Alert
title_short Sensors and Clinical Mastitis—The Quest for the Perfect Alert
title_sort sensors and clinical mastitis—the quest for the perfect alert
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3231225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22163637
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s100907991
work_keys_str_mv AT hogeveenhenk sensorsandclinicalmastitisthequestfortheperfectalert
AT kamphuisclaudia sensorsandclinicalmastitisthequestfortheperfectalert
AT steeneveldwilma sensorsandclinicalmastitisthequestfortheperfectalert
AT mollenhorstherman sensorsandclinicalmastitisthequestfortheperfectalert