Cargando…

Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect

BACKGROUND: Of 136 million babies born annually, around 10 million require assistance to breathe. Each year 814,000 neonatal deaths result from intrapartum-related events in term babies (previously “birth asphyxia”) and 1.03 million from complications of prematurity. No systematic assessment of mort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Anne CC, Cousens, Simon, Wall, Stephen N, Niermeyer, Susan, Darmstadt, Gary L, Carlo, Waldemar A, Keenan, William J, Bhutta, Zulfiqar A, Gill, Christopher, Lawn, Joy E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3231885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S12
_version_ 1782218293376974848
author Lee, Anne CC
Cousens, Simon
Wall, Stephen N
Niermeyer, Susan
Darmstadt, Gary L
Carlo, Waldemar A
Keenan, William J
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A
Gill, Christopher
Lawn, Joy E
author_facet Lee, Anne CC
Cousens, Simon
Wall, Stephen N
Niermeyer, Susan
Darmstadt, Gary L
Carlo, Waldemar A
Keenan, William J
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A
Gill, Christopher
Lawn, Joy E
author_sort Lee, Anne CC
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Of 136 million babies born annually, around 10 million require assistance to breathe. Each year 814,000 neonatal deaths result from intrapartum-related events in term babies (previously “birth asphyxia”) and 1.03 million from complications of prematurity. No systematic assessment of mortality reduction from tactile stimulation or resuscitation has been published. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the mortality effect of immediate newborn assessment and stimulation, and basic resuscitation on neonatal deaths due to term intrapartum-related events or preterm birth, for facility and home births. METHODS: We conducted systematic reviews for studies reporting relevant mortality or morbidity outcomes. Evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria adapted to provide a systematic approach to mortality effect estimates for the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). Meta-analysis was performed if appropriate. For interventions with low quality evidence but strong recommendation for implementation, a Delphi panel was convened to estimate effect size. RESULTS: We identified 24 studies of neonatal resuscitation reporting mortality outcomes (20 observational, 2 quasi-experimental, 2 cluster randomized controlled trials), but none of immediate newborn assessment and stimulation alone. A meta-analysis of three facility-based studies examined the effect of resuscitation training on intrapartum-related neonatal deaths (RR= 0.70, 95%CI 0.59-0.84); this estimate was used for the effect of facility-based basic neonatal resuscitation (additional to stimulation). The evidence for preterm mortality effect was low quality and thus expert opinion was sought. In community-based studies, resuscitation training was part of packages with multiple concurrent interventions, and/or studies did not distinguish term intrapartum-related from preterm deaths, hence no meta-analysis was conducted. Our Delphi panel of 18 experts estimated that immediate newborn assessment and stimulation would reduce both intrapartum-related and preterm deaths by 10%, facility-based resuscitation would prevent a further 10% of preterm deaths, and community-based resuscitation would prevent further 20% of intrapartum-related and 5% of preterm deaths. CONCLUSION: Neonatal resuscitation training in facilities reduces term intrapartum-related deaths by 30%. Yet, coverage of this intervention remains low in countries where most neonatal deaths occur and is a missed opportunity to save lives. Expert opinion supports smaller effects of neonatal resuscitation on preterm mortality in facilities and of basic resuscitation and newborn assessment and stimulation at community level. Further evaluation is required for impact, cost and implementation strategies in various contexts. FUNDING: This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through a grant to the US Fund for UNICEF, and to the Saving Newborn Lives program of Save the Children, through Save the Children US.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3231885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32318852011-12-07 Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect Lee, Anne CC Cousens, Simon Wall, Stephen N Niermeyer, Susan Darmstadt, Gary L Carlo, Waldemar A Keenan, William J Bhutta, Zulfiqar A Gill, Christopher Lawn, Joy E BMC Public Health Review BACKGROUND: Of 136 million babies born annually, around 10 million require assistance to breathe. Each year 814,000 neonatal deaths result from intrapartum-related events in term babies (previously “birth asphyxia”) and 1.03 million from complications of prematurity. No systematic assessment of mortality reduction from tactile stimulation or resuscitation has been published. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the mortality effect of immediate newborn assessment and stimulation, and basic resuscitation on neonatal deaths due to term intrapartum-related events or preterm birth, for facility and home births. METHODS: We conducted systematic reviews for studies reporting relevant mortality or morbidity outcomes. Evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria adapted to provide a systematic approach to mortality effect estimates for the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). Meta-analysis was performed if appropriate. For interventions with low quality evidence but strong recommendation for implementation, a Delphi panel was convened to estimate effect size. RESULTS: We identified 24 studies of neonatal resuscitation reporting mortality outcomes (20 observational, 2 quasi-experimental, 2 cluster randomized controlled trials), but none of immediate newborn assessment and stimulation alone. A meta-analysis of three facility-based studies examined the effect of resuscitation training on intrapartum-related neonatal deaths (RR= 0.70, 95%CI 0.59-0.84); this estimate was used for the effect of facility-based basic neonatal resuscitation (additional to stimulation). The evidence for preterm mortality effect was low quality and thus expert opinion was sought. In community-based studies, resuscitation training was part of packages with multiple concurrent interventions, and/or studies did not distinguish term intrapartum-related from preterm deaths, hence no meta-analysis was conducted. Our Delphi panel of 18 experts estimated that immediate newborn assessment and stimulation would reduce both intrapartum-related and preterm deaths by 10%, facility-based resuscitation would prevent a further 10% of preterm deaths, and community-based resuscitation would prevent further 20% of intrapartum-related and 5% of preterm deaths. CONCLUSION: Neonatal resuscitation training in facilities reduces term intrapartum-related deaths by 30%. Yet, coverage of this intervention remains low in countries where most neonatal deaths occur and is a missed opportunity to save lives. Expert opinion supports smaller effects of neonatal resuscitation on preterm mortality in facilities and of basic resuscitation and newborn assessment and stimulation at community level. Further evaluation is required for impact, cost and implementation strategies in various contexts. FUNDING: This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through a grant to the US Fund for UNICEF, and to the Saving Newborn Lives program of Save the Children, through Save the Children US. BioMed Central 2011-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3231885/ /pubmed/21501429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S12 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Lee, Anne CC
Cousens, Simon
Wall, Stephen N
Niermeyer, Susan
Darmstadt, Gary L
Carlo, Waldemar A
Keenan, William J
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A
Gill, Christopher
Lawn, Joy E
Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect
title Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect
title_full Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect
title_fullStr Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect
title_short Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect
title_sort neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: a systematic review, meta-analysis and delphi estimation of mortality effect
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3231885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S12
work_keys_str_mv AT leeannecc neonatalresuscitationandimmediatenewbornassessmentandstimulationforthepreventionofneonataldeathsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisanddelphiestimationofmortalityeffect
AT cousenssimon neonatalresuscitationandimmediatenewbornassessmentandstimulationforthepreventionofneonataldeathsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisanddelphiestimationofmortalityeffect
AT wallstephenn neonatalresuscitationandimmediatenewbornassessmentandstimulationforthepreventionofneonataldeathsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisanddelphiestimationofmortalityeffect
AT niermeyersusan neonatalresuscitationandimmediatenewbornassessmentandstimulationforthepreventionofneonataldeathsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisanddelphiestimationofmortalityeffect
AT darmstadtgaryl neonatalresuscitationandimmediatenewbornassessmentandstimulationforthepreventionofneonataldeathsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisanddelphiestimationofmortalityeffect
AT carlowaldemara neonatalresuscitationandimmediatenewbornassessmentandstimulationforthepreventionofneonataldeathsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisanddelphiestimationofmortalityeffect
AT keenanwilliamj neonatalresuscitationandimmediatenewbornassessmentandstimulationforthepreventionofneonataldeathsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisanddelphiestimationofmortalityeffect
AT bhuttazulfiqara neonatalresuscitationandimmediatenewbornassessmentandstimulationforthepreventionofneonataldeathsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisanddelphiestimationofmortalityeffect
AT gillchristopher neonatalresuscitationandimmediatenewbornassessmentandstimulationforthepreventionofneonataldeathsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisanddelphiestimationofmortalityeffect
AT lawnjoye neonatalresuscitationandimmediatenewbornassessmentandstimulationforthepreventionofneonataldeathsasystematicreviewmetaanalysisanddelphiestimationofmortalityeffect