Cargando…

An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) or pneumococcus is estimated to cause 821,000 child deaths each year. It has over 90 serotypes, of which 7 to 13 serotypes are included in current formulations of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webster, Julia, Theodoratou, Evropi, Nair, Harish, Seong, Ang Choon, Zgaga, Lina, Huda, Tanvir, Johnson, Hope L, Madhi, Shabir, Rubens, Craig, Zhang, Jian Shayne F, El Arifeen, Shams, Krause, Ryoko, Jacobs, Troy A, Brooks, Abdullah W, Campbell, Harry, Rudan, Igor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3231900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S26
_version_ 1782218296885510144
author Webster, Julia
Theodoratou, Evropi
Nair, Harish
Seong, Ang Choon
Zgaga, Lina
Huda, Tanvir
Johnson, Hope L
Madhi, Shabir
Rubens, Craig
Zhang, Jian Shayne F
El Arifeen, Shams
Krause, Ryoko
Jacobs, Troy A
Brooks, Abdullah W
Campbell, Harry
Rudan, Igor
author_facet Webster, Julia
Theodoratou, Evropi
Nair, Harish
Seong, Ang Choon
Zgaga, Lina
Huda, Tanvir
Johnson, Hope L
Madhi, Shabir
Rubens, Craig
Zhang, Jian Shayne F
El Arifeen, Shams
Krause, Ryoko
Jacobs, Troy A
Brooks, Abdullah W
Campbell, Harry
Rudan, Igor
author_sort Webster, Julia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) or pneumococcus is estimated to cause 821,000 child deaths each year. It has over 90 serotypes, of which 7 to 13 serotypes are included in current formulations of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines that are efficacious in young children. To further reduce the burden from SP pneumonia, a vaccine is required that could protect children from a greater diversity of serotypes. Two different types of vaccines against pneumococcal pneumonia are currently at varying stages of development: a multivalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine covering additional SP serotypes; and a conserved common pneumococcal protein antigen (PPA) vaccine offering protection for all serotypes. METHODS: We used a modified CHNRI methodology for setting priorities in health research investments. This was done in two stages. In Stage I, we systematically reviewed the literature related to emerging SP vaccines relevant to several criteria of interest: answerability; efficacy and effectiveness; cost of development, production and implementation; deliverability, affordability and sustainability; maximum potential for disease burden reduction; acceptability to the end users and health workers; and effect on equity. In Stage II, we conducted an expert opinion exercise by inviting 20 experts (leading basic scientists, international public health researchers, international policy makers and representatives of pharmaceutical companies). The policy makers and industry representatives accepted our invitation on the condition of anonymity, due to sensitive nature of their involvement in such exercises. They answered questions from CHNRI framework and their “collective optimism” towards each criterion was documented on a scale from 0 to 100%. RESULTS: The experts expressed very high level of optimism (over 80%) that low-cost polysaccharide conjugate SP vaccines would satisfy each of the 9 relevant CHNRI criteria. The median potential effectiveness of conjugate SP vaccines in reduction of overall childhood pneumonia mortality was predicted to be about 25% (interquartile range 20-38%, min. 15%, max 45%). For low cost, cross-protective common protein vaccines for SP the experts expressed concerns over answerability (72%) and the level of development costs (50%), while the scores for all other criteria were over 80%. The median potential effectiveness of common protein vaccines in reduction of overall childhood pneumonia mortality was predicted to be about 30% (interquartile range 26-40%, min. 20%, max 45%). CONCLUSIONS: Improved SP vaccines are a very promising investment that could substantially contribute to reduction of child mortality world-wide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3231900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32319002011-12-07 An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia Webster, Julia Theodoratou, Evropi Nair, Harish Seong, Ang Choon Zgaga, Lina Huda, Tanvir Johnson, Hope L Madhi, Shabir Rubens, Craig Zhang, Jian Shayne F El Arifeen, Shams Krause, Ryoko Jacobs, Troy A Brooks, Abdullah W Campbell, Harry Rudan, Igor BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) or pneumococcus is estimated to cause 821,000 child deaths each year. It has over 90 serotypes, of which 7 to 13 serotypes are included in current formulations of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines that are efficacious in young children. To further reduce the burden from SP pneumonia, a vaccine is required that could protect children from a greater diversity of serotypes. Two different types of vaccines against pneumococcal pneumonia are currently at varying stages of development: a multivalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine covering additional SP serotypes; and a conserved common pneumococcal protein antigen (PPA) vaccine offering protection for all serotypes. METHODS: We used a modified CHNRI methodology for setting priorities in health research investments. This was done in two stages. In Stage I, we systematically reviewed the literature related to emerging SP vaccines relevant to several criteria of interest: answerability; efficacy and effectiveness; cost of development, production and implementation; deliverability, affordability and sustainability; maximum potential for disease burden reduction; acceptability to the end users and health workers; and effect on equity. In Stage II, we conducted an expert opinion exercise by inviting 20 experts (leading basic scientists, international public health researchers, international policy makers and representatives of pharmaceutical companies). The policy makers and industry representatives accepted our invitation on the condition of anonymity, due to sensitive nature of their involvement in such exercises. They answered questions from CHNRI framework and their “collective optimism” towards each criterion was documented on a scale from 0 to 100%. RESULTS: The experts expressed very high level of optimism (over 80%) that low-cost polysaccharide conjugate SP vaccines would satisfy each of the 9 relevant CHNRI criteria. The median potential effectiveness of conjugate SP vaccines in reduction of overall childhood pneumonia mortality was predicted to be about 25% (interquartile range 20-38%, min. 15%, max 45%). For low cost, cross-protective common protein vaccines for SP the experts expressed concerns over answerability (72%) and the level of development costs (50%), while the scores for all other criteria were over 80%. The median potential effectiveness of common protein vaccines in reduction of overall childhood pneumonia mortality was predicted to be about 30% (interquartile range 26-40%, min. 20%, max 45%). CONCLUSIONS: Improved SP vaccines are a very promising investment that could substantially contribute to reduction of child mortality world-wide. BioMed Central 2011-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3231900/ /pubmed/21501444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S26 Text en Copyright ©2011 Webster et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Webster, Julia
Theodoratou, Evropi
Nair, Harish
Seong, Ang Choon
Zgaga, Lina
Huda, Tanvir
Johnson, Hope L
Madhi, Shabir
Rubens, Craig
Zhang, Jian Shayne F
El Arifeen, Shams
Krause, Ryoko
Jacobs, Troy A
Brooks, Abdullah W
Campbell, Harry
Rudan, Igor
An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia
title An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia
title_full An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia
title_fullStr An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia
title_short An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia
title_sort evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3231900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S26
work_keys_str_mv AT websterjulia anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT theodoratouevropi anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT nairharish anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT seongangchoon anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT zgagalina anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT hudatanvir anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT johnsonhopel anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT madhishabir anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT rubenscraig anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT zhangjianshaynef anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT elarifeenshams anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT krauseryoko anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT jacobstroya anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT brooksabdullahw anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT campbellharry anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT rudanigor anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT websterjulia evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT theodoratouevropi evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT nairharish evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT seongangchoon evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT zgagalina evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT hudatanvir evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT johnsonhopel evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT madhishabir evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT rubenscraig evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT zhangjianshaynef evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT elarifeenshams evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT krauseryoko evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT jacobstroya evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT brooksabdullahw evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT campbellharry evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia
AT rudanigor evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia