Cargando…
An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia
BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) or pneumococcus is estimated to cause 821,000 child deaths each year. It has over 90 serotypes, of which 7 to 13 serotypes are included in current formulations of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3231900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S26 |
_version_ | 1782218296885510144 |
---|---|
author | Webster, Julia Theodoratou, Evropi Nair, Harish Seong, Ang Choon Zgaga, Lina Huda, Tanvir Johnson, Hope L Madhi, Shabir Rubens, Craig Zhang, Jian Shayne F El Arifeen, Shams Krause, Ryoko Jacobs, Troy A Brooks, Abdullah W Campbell, Harry Rudan, Igor |
author_facet | Webster, Julia Theodoratou, Evropi Nair, Harish Seong, Ang Choon Zgaga, Lina Huda, Tanvir Johnson, Hope L Madhi, Shabir Rubens, Craig Zhang, Jian Shayne F El Arifeen, Shams Krause, Ryoko Jacobs, Troy A Brooks, Abdullah W Campbell, Harry Rudan, Igor |
author_sort | Webster, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) or pneumococcus is estimated to cause 821,000 child deaths each year. It has over 90 serotypes, of which 7 to 13 serotypes are included in current formulations of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines that are efficacious in young children. To further reduce the burden from SP pneumonia, a vaccine is required that could protect children from a greater diversity of serotypes. Two different types of vaccines against pneumococcal pneumonia are currently at varying stages of development: a multivalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine covering additional SP serotypes; and a conserved common pneumococcal protein antigen (PPA) vaccine offering protection for all serotypes. METHODS: We used a modified CHNRI methodology for setting priorities in health research investments. This was done in two stages. In Stage I, we systematically reviewed the literature related to emerging SP vaccines relevant to several criteria of interest: answerability; efficacy and effectiveness; cost of development, production and implementation; deliverability, affordability and sustainability; maximum potential for disease burden reduction; acceptability to the end users and health workers; and effect on equity. In Stage II, we conducted an expert opinion exercise by inviting 20 experts (leading basic scientists, international public health researchers, international policy makers and representatives of pharmaceutical companies). The policy makers and industry representatives accepted our invitation on the condition of anonymity, due to sensitive nature of their involvement in such exercises. They answered questions from CHNRI framework and their “collective optimism” towards each criterion was documented on a scale from 0 to 100%. RESULTS: The experts expressed very high level of optimism (over 80%) that low-cost polysaccharide conjugate SP vaccines would satisfy each of the 9 relevant CHNRI criteria. The median potential effectiveness of conjugate SP vaccines in reduction of overall childhood pneumonia mortality was predicted to be about 25% (interquartile range 20-38%, min. 15%, max 45%). For low cost, cross-protective common protein vaccines for SP the experts expressed concerns over answerability (72%) and the level of development costs (50%), while the scores for all other criteria were over 80%. The median potential effectiveness of common protein vaccines in reduction of overall childhood pneumonia mortality was predicted to be about 30% (interquartile range 26-40%, min. 20%, max 45%). CONCLUSIONS: Improved SP vaccines are a very promising investment that could substantially contribute to reduction of child mortality world-wide. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3231900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32319002011-12-07 An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia Webster, Julia Theodoratou, Evropi Nair, Harish Seong, Ang Choon Zgaga, Lina Huda, Tanvir Johnson, Hope L Madhi, Shabir Rubens, Craig Zhang, Jian Shayne F El Arifeen, Shams Krause, Ryoko Jacobs, Troy A Brooks, Abdullah W Campbell, Harry Rudan, Igor BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) or pneumococcus is estimated to cause 821,000 child deaths each year. It has over 90 serotypes, of which 7 to 13 serotypes are included in current formulations of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines that are efficacious in young children. To further reduce the burden from SP pneumonia, a vaccine is required that could protect children from a greater diversity of serotypes. Two different types of vaccines against pneumococcal pneumonia are currently at varying stages of development: a multivalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine covering additional SP serotypes; and a conserved common pneumococcal protein antigen (PPA) vaccine offering protection for all serotypes. METHODS: We used a modified CHNRI methodology for setting priorities in health research investments. This was done in two stages. In Stage I, we systematically reviewed the literature related to emerging SP vaccines relevant to several criteria of interest: answerability; efficacy and effectiveness; cost of development, production and implementation; deliverability, affordability and sustainability; maximum potential for disease burden reduction; acceptability to the end users and health workers; and effect on equity. In Stage II, we conducted an expert opinion exercise by inviting 20 experts (leading basic scientists, international public health researchers, international policy makers and representatives of pharmaceutical companies). The policy makers and industry representatives accepted our invitation on the condition of anonymity, due to sensitive nature of their involvement in such exercises. They answered questions from CHNRI framework and their “collective optimism” towards each criterion was documented on a scale from 0 to 100%. RESULTS: The experts expressed very high level of optimism (over 80%) that low-cost polysaccharide conjugate SP vaccines would satisfy each of the 9 relevant CHNRI criteria. The median potential effectiveness of conjugate SP vaccines in reduction of overall childhood pneumonia mortality was predicted to be about 25% (interquartile range 20-38%, min. 15%, max 45%). For low cost, cross-protective common protein vaccines for SP the experts expressed concerns over answerability (72%) and the level of development costs (50%), while the scores for all other criteria were over 80%. The median potential effectiveness of common protein vaccines in reduction of overall childhood pneumonia mortality was predicted to be about 30% (interquartile range 26-40%, min. 20%, max 45%). CONCLUSIONS: Improved SP vaccines are a very promising investment that could substantially contribute to reduction of child mortality world-wide. BioMed Central 2011-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3231900/ /pubmed/21501444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S26 Text en Copyright ©2011 Webster et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Webster, Julia Theodoratou, Evropi Nair, Harish Seong, Ang Choon Zgaga, Lina Huda, Tanvir Johnson, Hope L Madhi, Shabir Rubens, Craig Zhang, Jian Shayne F El Arifeen, Shams Krause, Ryoko Jacobs, Troy A Brooks, Abdullah W Campbell, Harry Rudan, Igor An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia |
title | An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia |
title_full | An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia |
title_short | An evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia |
title_sort | evaluation of emerging vaccines for childhood pneumococcal pneumonia |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3231900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT websterjulia anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT theodoratouevropi anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT nairharish anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT seongangchoon anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT zgagalina anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT hudatanvir anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT johnsonhopel anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT madhishabir anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT rubenscraig anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT zhangjianshaynef anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT elarifeenshams anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT krauseryoko anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT jacobstroya anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT brooksabdullahw anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT campbellharry anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT rudanigor anevaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT websterjulia evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT theodoratouevropi evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT nairharish evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT seongangchoon evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT zgagalina evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT hudatanvir evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT johnsonhopel evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT madhishabir evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT rubenscraig evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT zhangjianshaynef evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT elarifeenshams evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT krauseryoko evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT jacobstroya evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT brooksabdullahw evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT campbellharry evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia AT rudanigor evaluationofemergingvaccinesforchildhoodpneumococcalpneumonia |