Cargando…

Methods used in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)

BACKGROUND: Choosing an optimum set of child health interventions for maximum mortality impact is important within resource poor policy environments. The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) is a computer model that estimates the mortality and stillbirth impact of scaling up proven maternal and child health inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winfrey, William, McKinnon, Robert, Stover, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3231906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S32
_version_ 1782218298288504832
author Winfrey, William
McKinnon, Robert
Stover, John
author_facet Winfrey, William
McKinnon, Robert
Stover, John
author_sort Winfrey, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Choosing an optimum set of child health interventions for maximum mortality impact is important within resource poor policy environments. The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) is a computer model that estimates the mortality and stillbirth impact of scaling up proven maternal and child health interventions. This paper will describe the methods used to estimate the impact of scaling up interventions on neonatal and child mortality. MODEL STRUCTURE AND ASSUMPTIONS: LiST estimates mortality impact via five age bands 0 months, 1-5 months, 6-11 months, 12-23 months and 24 to 59 months. For each of these age bands reductions in cause specific mortality are estimated. Nutrition interventions can impact either nutritional statuses or directly impact mortality. In the former case, LiST acts as a cohort model where current nutritional statuses such as stunting impact the probability of stunting as the cohort ages. LiST links with a demographic projections model (DemProj) to estimate the deaths and deaths averted due to the reductions in mortality rates. USING LIST: LiST can be downloaded at http://www.jhsph.edu/dept/ih/IIP/list/ where simple instructions are available for installation. LiST includes default values for coverage and effectiveness for many less developed countries obtained from credible sources. CONCLUSIONS: The development of LiST is a continuing process. Via technical inputs from the Child Health Epidemiological Group, effectiveness values are updated, interventions are adopted and new features added.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3231906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32319062011-12-07 Methods used in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) Winfrey, William McKinnon, Robert Stover, John BMC Public Health Methodology BACKGROUND: Choosing an optimum set of child health interventions for maximum mortality impact is important within resource poor policy environments. The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) is a computer model that estimates the mortality and stillbirth impact of scaling up proven maternal and child health interventions. This paper will describe the methods used to estimate the impact of scaling up interventions on neonatal and child mortality. MODEL STRUCTURE AND ASSUMPTIONS: LiST estimates mortality impact via five age bands 0 months, 1-5 months, 6-11 months, 12-23 months and 24 to 59 months. For each of these age bands reductions in cause specific mortality are estimated. Nutrition interventions can impact either nutritional statuses or directly impact mortality. In the former case, LiST acts as a cohort model where current nutritional statuses such as stunting impact the probability of stunting as the cohort ages. LiST links with a demographic projections model (DemProj) to estimate the deaths and deaths averted due to the reductions in mortality rates. USING LIST: LiST can be downloaded at http://www.jhsph.edu/dept/ih/IIP/list/ where simple instructions are available for installation. LiST includes default values for coverage and effectiveness for many less developed countries obtained from credible sources. CONCLUSIONS: The development of LiST is a continuing process. Via technical inputs from the Child Health Epidemiological Group, effectiveness values are updated, interventions are adopted and new features added. BioMed Central 2011-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3231906/ /pubmed/21501451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S32 Text en Copyright ©2011 Winfrey et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Winfrey, William
McKinnon, Robert
Stover, John
Methods used in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title Methods used in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title_full Methods used in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title_fullStr Methods used in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title_full_unstemmed Methods used in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title_short Methods used in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
title_sort methods used in the lives saved tool (list)
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3231906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S32
work_keys_str_mv AT winfreywilliam methodsusedinthelivessavedtoollist
AT mckinnonrobert methodsusedinthelivessavedtoollist
AT stoverjohn methodsusedinthelivessavedtoollist