Cargando…

Measuring the Population Burden of Injuries—Implications for Global and National Estimates: A Multi-centre Prospective UK Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND: Current methods of measuring the population burden of injuries rely on many assumptions and limited data available to the global burden of diseases (GBD) studies. The aim of this study was to compare the population burden of injuries using different approaches from the UK Burden of Injur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyons, Ronan A., Kendrick, Denise, Towner, Elizabeth M., Christie, Nicola, Macey, Steven, Coupland, Carol, Gabbe, Belinda J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3232198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22162954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001140
_version_ 1782218332559114240
author Lyons, Ronan A.
Kendrick, Denise
Towner, Elizabeth M.
Christie, Nicola
Macey, Steven
Coupland, Carol
Gabbe, Belinda J.
author_facet Lyons, Ronan A.
Kendrick, Denise
Towner, Elizabeth M.
Christie, Nicola
Macey, Steven
Coupland, Carol
Gabbe, Belinda J.
author_sort Lyons, Ronan A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current methods of measuring the population burden of injuries rely on many assumptions and limited data available to the global burden of diseases (GBD) studies. The aim of this study was to compare the population burden of injuries using different approaches from the UK Burden of Injury (UKBOI) and GBD studies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The UKBOI was a prospective cohort of 1,517 injured individuals that collected patient-reported outcomes. Extrapolated outcome data were combined with multiple sources of morbidity and mortality data to derive population metrics of the burden of injury in the UK. Participants were injured patients recruited from hospitals in four UK cities and towns: Swansea, Nottingham, Bristol, and Guildford, between September 2005 and April 2007. Patient-reported changes in quality of life using the EQ-5D at baseline, 1, 4, and 12 months after injury provided disability weights used to calculate the years lived with disability (YLDs) component of disability adjusted life years (DALYs). DALYs were calculated for the UK and extrapolated to global estimates using both UKBOI and GBD disability weights. Estimated numbers (and rates per 100,000) for UK population extrapolations were 750,999 (1,240) for hospital admissions, 7,982,947 (13,339) for emergency department (ED) attendances, and 22,185 (36.8) for injury-related deaths in 2005. Nonadmitted ED-treated injuries accounted for 67% of YLDs. Estimates for UK DALYs amounted to 1,771,486 (82% due to YLDs), compared with 669,822 (52% due to YLDs) using the GBD approach. Extrapolating patient-derived disability weights to GBD estimates would increase injury-related DALYs 2.6-fold. CONCLUSIONS: The use of disability weights derived from patient experiences combined with additional morbidity data on ED-treated patients and inpatients suggests that the absolute burden of injury is higher than previously estimated. These findings have substantial implications for improving measurement of the national and global burden of injury. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3232198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32321982011-12-09 Measuring the Population Burden of Injuries—Implications for Global and National Estimates: A Multi-centre Prospective UK Longitudinal Study Lyons, Ronan A. Kendrick, Denise Towner, Elizabeth M. Christie, Nicola Macey, Steven Coupland, Carol Gabbe, Belinda J. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Current methods of measuring the population burden of injuries rely on many assumptions and limited data available to the global burden of diseases (GBD) studies. The aim of this study was to compare the population burden of injuries using different approaches from the UK Burden of Injury (UKBOI) and GBD studies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The UKBOI was a prospective cohort of 1,517 injured individuals that collected patient-reported outcomes. Extrapolated outcome data were combined with multiple sources of morbidity and mortality data to derive population metrics of the burden of injury in the UK. Participants were injured patients recruited from hospitals in four UK cities and towns: Swansea, Nottingham, Bristol, and Guildford, between September 2005 and April 2007. Patient-reported changes in quality of life using the EQ-5D at baseline, 1, 4, and 12 months after injury provided disability weights used to calculate the years lived with disability (YLDs) component of disability adjusted life years (DALYs). DALYs were calculated for the UK and extrapolated to global estimates using both UKBOI and GBD disability weights. Estimated numbers (and rates per 100,000) for UK population extrapolations were 750,999 (1,240) for hospital admissions, 7,982,947 (13,339) for emergency department (ED) attendances, and 22,185 (36.8) for injury-related deaths in 2005. Nonadmitted ED-treated injuries accounted for 67% of YLDs. Estimates for UK DALYs amounted to 1,771,486 (82% due to YLDs), compared with 669,822 (52% due to YLDs) using the GBD approach. Extrapolating patient-derived disability weights to GBD estimates would increase injury-related DALYs 2.6-fold. CONCLUSIONS: The use of disability weights derived from patient experiences combined with additional morbidity data on ED-treated patients and inpatients suggests that the absolute burden of injury is higher than previously estimated. These findings have substantial implications for improving measurement of the national and global burden of injury. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2011-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3232198/ /pubmed/22162954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001140 Text en Lyons et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lyons, Ronan A.
Kendrick, Denise
Towner, Elizabeth M.
Christie, Nicola
Macey, Steven
Coupland, Carol
Gabbe, Belinda J.
Measuring the Population Burden of Injuries—Implications for Global and National Estimates: A Multi-centre Prospective UK Longitudinal Study
title Measuring the Population Burden of Injuries—Implications for Global and National Estimates: A Multi-centre Prospective UK Longitudinal Study
title_full Measuring the Population Burden of Injuries—Implications for Global and National Estimates: A Multi-centre Prospective UK Longitudinal Study
title_fullStr Measuring the Population Burden of Injuries—Implications for Global and National Estimates: A Multi-centre Prospective UK Longitudinal Study
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the Population Burden of Injuries—Implications for Global and National Estimates: A Multi-centre Prospective UK Longitudinal Study
title_short Measuring the Population Burden of Injuries—Implications for Global and National Estimates: A Multi-centre Prospective UK Longitudinal Study
title_sort measuring the population burden of injuries—implications for global and national estimates: a multi-centre prospective uk longitudinal study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3232198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22162954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001140
work_keys_str_mv AT lyonsronana measuringthepopulationburdenofinjuriesimplicationsforglobalandnationalestimatesamulticentreprospectiveuklongitudinalstudy
AT kendrickdenise measuringthepopulationburdenofinjuriesimplicationsforglobalandnationalestimatesamulticentreprospectiveuklongitudinalstudy
AT townerelizabethm measuringthepopulationburdenofinjuriesimplicationsforglobalandnationalestimatesamulticentreprospectiveuklongitudinalstudy
AT christienicola measuringthepopulationburdenofinjuriesimplicationsforglobalandnationalestimatesamulticentreprospectiveuklongitudinalstudy
AT maceysteven measuringthepopulationburdenofinjuriesimplicationsforglobalandnationalestimatesamulticentreprospectiveuklongitudinalstudy
AT couplandcarol measuringthepopulationburdenofinjuriesimplicationsforglobalandnationalestimatesamulticentreprospectiveuklongitudinalstudy
AT gabbebelindaj measuringthepopulationburdenofinjuriesimplicationsforglobalandnationalestimatesamulticentreprospectiveuklongitudinalstudy
AT measuringthepopulationburdenofinjuriesimplicationsforglobalandnationalestimatesamulticentreprospectiveuklongitudinalstudy