Cargando…
The Primacy of Public Health Considerations in Defining Poor Quality Medicines
Paul Newton and colleagues argue that public health, and not intellectual property or trade issues, should be the prime consideration in defining and combating counterfeit medicines, and that the World Health Organization (WHO) should take a more prominent role.
Autores principales: | Newton, Paul N., Amin, Abdinasir A., Bird, Chris, Passmore, Phillip, Dukes, Graham, Tomson, Göran, Simons, Bright, Bate, Roger, Guerin, Philippe J., White, Nicholas J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3232210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22162953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001139 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Affective Primacy vs. Cognitive Primacy: Dissolving the Debate
por: Lai, Vicky Tzuyin, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Fairness requires deliberation: the primacy of economic over social considerations
por: Hochman, Guy, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Nutritional issues and considerations in the elderly: an update
por: Vranešić Bender, Darija, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Defining the Impact of Non-Native Species
por: Jeschke, Jonathan M, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The Dilemma of Compulsory Vaccinations—Ethical and Legal Considerations
por: Sela, Yael, et al.
Publicado: (2023)