Cargando…

Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant

The separation of mercury ions from artificially contaminated water by the foam fractionation process using a biosurfactant (surfactin) and chemical surfactants (SDS and Tween-80) was investigated in this study. Parameters such as surfactant and mercury concentration, pH, foam volume, and digestion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Hau-Ren, Chen, Chien-Cheng, Reddy, A. Satyanarayana, Chen, Chien-Yen, Li, Wun Rong, Tseng, Min-Jen, Liu, Hung-Tsan, Pan, Wei, Maity, Jyoti Prakash, Atla, Shashi B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3233467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118245
_version_ 1782218415872671744
author Chen, Hau-Ren
Chen, Chien-Cheng
Reddy, A. Satyanarayana
Chen, Chien-Yen
Li, Wun Rong
Tseng, Min-Jen
Liu, Hung-Tsan
Pan, Wei
Maity, Jyoti Prakash
Atla, Shashi B.
author_facet Chen, Hau-Ren
Chen, Chien-Cheng
Reddy, A. Satyanarayana
Chen, Chien-Yen
Li, Wun Rong
Tseng, Min-Jen
Liu, Hung-Tsan
Pan, Wei
Maity, Jyoti Prakash
Atla, Shashi B.
author_sort Chen, Hau-Ren
collection PubMed
description The separation of mercury ions from artificially contaminated water by the foam fractionation process using a biosurfactant (surfactin) and chemical surfactants (SDS and Tween-80) was investigated in this study. Parameters such as surfactant and mercury concentration, pH, foam volume, and digestion time were varied and their effects on the efficiency of mercury removal were investigated. The recovery efficiency of mercury ions was highly sensitive to the concentration of the surfactant. The highest mercury ion recovery by surfactin was obtained using a surfactin concentration of 10 × CMC, while recovery using SDS required < 10 × CMC and Tween-80 >10 × CMC. However, the enrichment of mercury ions in the foam was superior with surfactin, the mercury enrichment value corresponding to the highest metal recovery (10.4%) by surfactin being 1.53. Dilute solutions (2-mg L(−1) Hg(2+)) resulted in better separation (36.4%), while concentrated solutions (100 mg L(−1)) enabled only a 2.3% recovery using surfactin. An increase in the digestion time of the metal solution with surfactin yielded better separation as compared with a freshly-prepared solution, and an increase in the airflow rate increased bubble production, resulting in higher metal recovery but low enrichment. Basic solutions yielded higher mercury separation as compared with acidic solutions due to the precipitation of surfactin under acidic conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3233467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32334672011-12-15 Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant Chen, Hau-Ren Chen, Chien-Cheng Reddy, A. Satyanarayana Chen, Chien-Yen Li, Wun Rong Tseng, Min-Jen Liu, Hung-Tsan Pan, Wei Maity, Jyoti Prakash Atla, Shashi B. Int J Mol Sci Article The separation of mercury ions from artificially contaminated water by the foam fractionation process using a biosurfactant (surfactin) and chemical surfactants (SDS and Tween-80) was investigated in this study. Parameters such as surfactant and mercury concentration, pH, foam volume, and digestion time were varied and their effects on the efficiency of mercury removal were investigated. The recovery efficiency of mercury ions was highly sensitive to the concentration of the surfactant. The highest mercury ion recovery by surfactin was obtained using a surfactin concentration of 10 × CMC, while recovery using SDS required < 10 × CMC and Tween-80 >10 × CMC. However, the enrichment of mercury ions in the foam was superior with surfactin, the mercury enrichment value corresponding to the highest metal recovery (10.4%) by surfactin being 1.53. Dilute solutions (2-mg L(−1) Hg(2+)) resulted in better separation (36.4%), while concentrated solutions (100 mg L(−1)) enabled only a 2.3% recovery using surfactin. An increase in the digestion time of the metal solution with surfactin yielded better separation as compared with a freshly-prepared solution, and an increase in the airflow rate increased bubble production, resulting in higher metal recovery but low enrichment. Basic solutions yielded higher mercury separation as compared with acidic solutions due to the precipitation of surfactin under acidic conditions. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2011-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3233467/ /pubmed/22174661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118245 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Hau-Ren
Chen, Chien-Cheng
Reddy, A. Satyanarayana
Chen, Chien-Yen
Li, Wun Rong
Tseng, Min-Jen
Liu, Hung-Tsan
Pan, Wei
Maity, Jyoti Prakash
Atla, Shashi B.
Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant
title Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant
title_full Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant
title_fullStr Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant
title_full_unstemmed Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant
title_short Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant
title_sort removal of mercury by foam fractionation using surfactin, a biosurfactant
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3233467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118245
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhauren removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant
AT chenchiencheng removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant
AT reddyasatyanarayana removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant
AT chenchienyen removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant
AT liwunrong removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant
AT tsengminjen removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant
AT liuhungtsan removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant
AT panwei removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant
AT maityjyotiprakash removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant
AT atlashashib removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant