Cargando…
Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant
The separation of mercury ions from artificially contaminated water by the foam fractionation process using a biosurfactant (surfactin) and chemical surfactants (SDS and Tween-80) was investigated in this study. Parameters such as surfactant and mercury concentration, pH, foam volume, and digestion...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3233467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118245 |
_version_ | 1782218415872671744 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Hau-Ren Chen, Chien-Cheng Reddy, A. Satyanarayana Chen, Chien-Yen Li, Wun Rong Tseng, Min-Jen Liu, Hung-Tsan Pan, Wei Maity, Jyoti Prakash Atla, Shashi B. |
author_facet | Chen, Hau-Ren Chen, Chien-Cheng Reddy, A. Satyanarayana Chen, Chien-Yen Li, Wun Rong Tseng, Min-Jen Liu, Hung-Tsan Pan, Wei Maity, Jyoti Prakash Atla, Shashi B. |
author_sort | Chen, Hau-Ren |
collection | PubMed |
description | The separation of mercury ions from artificially contaminated water by the foam fractionation process using a biosurfactant (surfactin) and chemical surfactants (SDS and Tween-80) was investigated in this study. Parameters such as surfactant and mercury concentration, pH, foam volume, and digestion time were varied and their effects on the efficiency of mercury removal were investigated. The recovery efficiency of mercury ions was highly sensitive to the concentration of the surfactant. The highest mercury ion recovery by surfactin was obtained using a surfactin concentration of 10 × CMC, while recovery using SDS required < 10 × CMC and Tween-80 >10 × CMC. However, the enrichment of mercury ions in the foam was superior with surfactin, the mercury enrichment value corresponding to the highest metal recovery (10.4%) by surfactin being 1.53. Dilute solutions (2-mg L(−1) Hg(2+)) resulted in better separation (36.4%), while concentrated solutions (100 mg L(−1)) enabled only a 2.3% recovery using surfactin. An increase in the digestion time of the metal solution with surfactin yielded better separation as compared with a freshly-prepared solution, and an increase in the airflow rate increased bubble production, resulting in higher metal recovery but low enrichment. Basic solutions yielded higher mercury separation as compared with acidic solutions due to the precipitation of surfactin under acidic conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3233467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32334672011-12-15 Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant Chen, Hau-Ren Chen, Chien-Cheng Reddy, A. Satyanarayana Chen, Chien-Yen Li, Wun Rong Tseng, Min-Jen Liu, Hung-Tsan Pan, Wei Maity, Jyoti Prakash Atla, Shashi B. Int J Mol Sci Article The separation of mercury ions from artificially contaminated water by the foam fractionation process using a biosurfactant (surfactin) and chemical surfactants (SDS and Tween-80) was investigated in this study. Parameters such as surfactant and mercury concentration, pH, foam volume, and digestion time were varied and their effects on the efficiency of mercury removal were investigated. The recovery efficiency of mercury ions was highly sensitive to the concentration of the surfactant. The highest mercury ion recovery by surfactin was obtained using a surfactin concentration of 10 × CMC, while recovery using SDS required < 10 × CMC and Tween-80 >10 × CMC. However, the enrichment of mercury ions in the foam was superior with surfactin, the mercury enrichment value corresponding to the highest metal recovery (10.4%) by surfactin being 1.53. Dilute solutions (2-mg L(−1) Hg(2+)) resulted in better separation (36.4%), while concentrated solutions (100 mg L(−1)) enabled only a 2.3% recovery using surfactin. An increase in the digestion time of the metal solution with surfactin yielded better separation as compared with a freshly-prepared solution, and an increase in the airflow rate increased bubble production, resulting in higher metal recovery but low enrichment. Basic solutions yielded higher mercury separation as compared with acidic solutions due to the precipitation of surfactin under acidic conditions. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2011-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3233467/ /pubmed/22174661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118245 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Hau-Ren Chen, Chien-Cheng Reddy, A. Satyanarayana Chen, Chien-Yen Li, Wun Rong Tseng, Min-Jen Liu, Hung-Tsan Pan, Wei Maity, Jyoti Prakash Atla, Shashi B. Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant |
title | Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant |
title_full | Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant |
title_fullStr | Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant |
title_full_unstemmed | Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant |
title_short | Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant |
title_sort | removal of mercury by foam fractionation using surfactin, a biosurfactant |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3233467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenhauren removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant AT chenchiencheng removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant AT reddyasatyanarayana removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant AT chenchienyen removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant AT liwunrong removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant AT tsengminjen removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant AT liuhungtsan removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant AT panwei removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant AT maityjyotiprakash removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant AT atlashashib removalofmercurybyfoamfractionationusingsurfactinabiosurfactant |