Cargando…

Dominance, Biomass and Extinction Resistance Determine the Consequences of Biodiversity Loss for Multiple Coastal Ecosystem Processes

Key ecosystem processes such as carbon and nutrient cycling could be deteriorating as a result of biodiversity loss. However, currently we lack the ability to predict the consequences of realistic species loss on ecosystem processes. The aim of this study was to test whether species contributions to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Thomas W., Jenkins, Stuart R., Kingham, Rachel, Kenworthy, Joseph, Hawkins, Stephen J., Hiddink, Jan G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3233569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22163297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028362
_version_ 1782218434145157120
author Davies, Thomas W.
Jenkins, Stuart R.
Kingham, Rachel
Kenworthy, Joseph
Hawkins, Stephen J.
Hiddink, Jan G.
author_facet Davies, Thomas W.
Jenkins, Stuart R.
Kingham, Rachel
Kenworthy, Joseph
Hawkins, Stephen J.
Hiddink, Jan G.
author_sort Davies, Thomas W.
collection PubMed
description Key ecosystem processes such as carbon and nutrient cycling could be deteriorating as a result of biodiversity loss. However, currently we lack the ability to predict the consequences of realistic species loss on ecosystem processes. The aim of this study was to test whether species contributions to community biomass can be used as surrogate measures of their contribution to ecosystem processes. These were gross community productivity in a salt marsh plant assemblage and an intertidal macroalgae assemblage; community clearance of microalgae in sessile suspension feeding invertebrate assemblage; and nutrient uptake in an intertidal macroalgae assemblage. We conducted a series of biodiversity manipulations that represented realistic species extinction sequences in each of the three contrasting assemblages. Species were removed in a subtractive fashion so that biomass was allowed to vary with each species removal, and key ecosystem processes were measured at each stage of community disassembly. The functional contribution of species was directly proportional to their contribution to community biomass in a 1∶1 ratio, a relationship that was consistent across three contrasting marine ecosystems and three ecosystem processes. This suggests that the biomass contributed by a species to an assemblage can be used to approximately predict the proportional decline in an ecosystem process when that species is lost. Such predictions represent “worst case scenarios” because, over time, extinction resilient species can offset the loss of biomass associated with the extinction of competitors. We also modelled a “best case scenario” that accounts for compensatory responses by the extant species with the highest per capita contribution to ecosystem processes. These worst and best case scenarios could be used to predict the minimum and maximum species required to sustain threshold values of ecosystem processes in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3233569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32335692011-12-12 Dominance, Biomass and Extinction Resistance Determine the Consequences of Biodiversity Loss for Multiple Coastal Ecosystem Processes Davies, Thomas W. Jenkins, Stuart R. Kingham, Rachel Kenworthy, Joseph Hawkins, Stephen J. Hiddink, Jan G. PLoS One Research Article Key ecosystem processes such as carbon and nutrient cycling could be deteriorating as a result of biodiversity loss. However, currently we lack the ability to predict the consequences of realistic species loss on ecosystem processes. The aim of this study was to test whether species contributions to community biomass can be used as surrogate measures of their contribution to ecosystem processes. These were gross community productivity in a salt marsh plant assemblage and an intertidal macroalgae assemblage; community clearance of microalgae in sessile suspension feeding invertebrate assemblage; and nutrient uptake in an intertidal macroalgae assemblage. We conducted a series of biodiversity manipulations that represented realistic species extinction sequences in each of the three contrasting assemblages. Species were removed in a subtractive fashion so that biomass was allowed to vary with each species removal, and key ecosystem processes were measured at each stage of community disassembly. The functional contribution of species was directly proportional to their contribution to community biomass in a 1∶1 ratio, a relationship that was consistent across three contrasting marine ecosystems and three ecosystem processes. This suggests that the biomass contributed by a species to an assemblage can be used to approximately predict the proportional decline in an ecosystem process when that species is lost. Such predictions represent “worst case scenarios” because, over time, extinction resilient species can offset the loss of biomass associated with the extinction of competitors. We also modelled a “best case scenario” that accounts for compensatory responses by the extant species with the highest per capita contribution to ecosystem processes. These worst and best case scenarios could be used to predict the minimum and maximum species required to sustain threshold values of ecosystem processes in the future. Public Library of Science 2011-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3233569/ /pubmed/22163297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028362 Text en Davies et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Davies, Thomas W.
Jenkins, Stuart R.
Kingham, Rachel
Kenworthy, Joseph
Hawkins, Stephen J.
Hiddink, Jan G.
Dominance, Biomass and Extinction Resistance Determine the Consequences of Biodiversity Loss for Multiple Coastal Ecosystem Processes
title Dominance, Biomass and Extinction Resistance Determine the Consequences of Biodiversity Loss for Multiple Coastal Ecosystem Processes
title_full Dominance, Biomass and Extinction Resistance Determine the Consequences of Biodiversity Loss for Multiple Coastal Ecosystem Processes
title_fullStr Dominance, Biomass and Extinction Resistance Determine the Consequences of Biodiversity Loss for Multiple Coastal Ecosystem Processes
title_full_unstemmed Dominance, Biomass and Extinction Resistance Determine the Consequences of Biodiversity Loss for Multiple Coastal Ecosystem Processes
title_short Dominance, Biomass and Extinction Resistance Determine the Consequences of Biodiversity Loss for Multiple Coastal Ecosystem Processes
title_sort dominance, biomass and extinction resistance determine the consequences of biodiversity loss for multiple coastal ecosystem processes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3233569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22163297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028362
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesthomasw dominancebiomassandextinctionresistancedeterminetheconsequencesofbiodiversitylossformultiplecoastalecosystemprocesses
AT jenkinsstuartr dominancebiomassandextinctionresistancedeterminetheconsequencesofbiodiversitylossformultiplecoastalecosystemprocesses
AT kinghamrachel dominancebiomassandextinctionresistancedeterminetheconsequencesofbiodiversitylossformultiplecoastalecosystemprocesses
AT kenworthyjoseph dominancebiomassandextinctionresistancedeterminetheconsequencesofbiodiversitylossformultiplecoastalecosystemprocesses
AT hawkinsstephenj dominancebiomassandextinctionresistancedeterminetheconsequencesofbiodiversitylossformultiplecoastalecosystemprocesses
AT hiddinkjang dominancebiomassandextinctionresistancedeterminetheconsequencesofbiodiversitylossformultiplecoastalecosystemprocesses