Cargando…

Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems

BACKGROUND: Countries willing to adopt a REDD regime need to establish a national Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system that provides information on forest carbon stocks and carbon stock changes. Due to the extensive areas covered by forests the information is generally obtained by sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Köhl, Michael, Lister, Andrew, Scott, Charles T, Baldauf, Thomas, Plugge, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-6-10
_version_ 1782218478316421120
author Köhl, Michael
Lister, Andrew
Scott, Charles T
Baldauf, Thomas
Plugge, Daniel
author_facet Köhl, Michael
Lister, Andrew
Scott, Charles T
Baldauf, Thomas
Plugge, Daniel
author_sort Köhl, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Countries willing to adopt a REDD regime need to establish a national Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system that provides information on forest carbon stocks and carbon stock changes. Due to the extensive areas covered by forests the information is generally obtained by sample based surveys. Most operational sampling approaches utilize a combination of earth-observation data and in-situ field assessments as data sources. RESULTS: We compared the cost-efficiency of four different sampling design alternatives (simple random sampling, regression estimators, stratified sampling, 2-phase sampling with regression estimators) that have been proposed in the scope of REDD. Three of the design alternatives provide for a combination of in-situ and earth-observation data. Under different settings of remote sensing coverage, cost per field plot, cost of remote sensing imagery, correlation between attributes quantified in remote sensing and field data, as well as population variability and the percent standard error over total survey cost was calculated. The cost-efficiency of forest carbon stock assessments is driven by the sampling design chosen. Our results indicate that the cost of remote sensing imagery is decisive for the cost-efficiency of a sampling design. The variability of the sample population impairs cost-efficiency, but does not reverse the pattern of cost-efficiency of the individual design alternatives. CONCLUSIONS, BRIEF SUMMARY AND POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS: Our results clearly indicate that it is important to consider cost-efficiency in the development of forest carbon stock assessments and the selection of remote sensing techniques. The development of MRV-systems for REDD need to be based on a sound optimization process that compares different data sources and sampling designs with respect to their cost-efficiency. This helps to reduce the uncertainties related with the quantification of carbon stocks and to increase the financial benefits from adopting a REDD regime.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3234178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32341782011-12-12 Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems Köhl, Michael Lister, Andrew Scott, Charles T Baldauf, Thomas Plugge, Daniel Carbon Balance Manag Methodology BACKGROUND: Countries willing to adopt a REDD regime need to establish a national Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system that provides information on forest carbon stocks and carbon stock changes. Due to the extensive areas covered by forests the information is generally obtained by sample based surveys. Most operational sampling approaches utilize a combination of earth-observation data and in-situ field assessments as data sources. RESULTS: We compared the cost-efficiency of four different sampling design alternatives (simple random sampling, regression estimators, stratified sampling, 2-phase sampling with regression estimators) that have been proposed in the scope of REDD. Three of the design alternatives provide for a combination of in-situ and earth-observation data. Under different settings of remote sensing coverage, cost per field plot, cost of remote sensing imagery, correlation between attributes quantified in remote sensing and field data, as well as population variability and the percent standard error over total survey cost was calculated. The cost-efficiency of forest carbon stock assessments is driven by the sampling design chosen. Our results indicate that the cost of remote sensing imagery is decisive for the cost-efficiency of a sampling design. The variability of the sample population impairs cost-efficiency, but does not reverse the pattern of cost-efficiency of the individual design alternatives. CONCLUSIONS, BRIEF SUMMARY AND POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS: Our results clearly indicate that it is important to consider cost-efficiency in the development of forest carbon stock assessments and the selection of remote sensing techniques. The development of MRV-systems for REDD need to be based on a sound optimization process that compares different data sources and sampling designs with respect to their cost-efficiency. This helps to reduce the uncertainties related with the quantification of carbon stocks and to increase the financial benefits from adopting a REDD regime. BioMed Central 2011-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3234178/ /pubmed/22059587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-6-10 Text en Copyright ©2011 Köhl et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Köhl, Michael
Lister, Andrew
Scott, Charles T
Baldauf, Thomas
Plugge, Daniel
Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems
title Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems
title_full Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems
title_fullStr Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems
title_full_unstemmed Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems
title_short Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems
title_sort implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-6-10
work_keys_str_mv AT kohlmichael implicationsofsamplingdesignandsamplesizefornationalcarbonaccountingsystems
AT listerandrew implicationsofsamplingdesignandsamplesizefornationalcarbonaccountingsystems
AT scottcharlest implicationsofsamplingdesignandsamplesizefornationalcarbonaccountingsystems
AT baldaufthomas implicationsofsamplingdesignandsamplesizefornationalcarbonaccountingsystems
AT pluggedaniel implicationsofsamplingdesignandsamplesizefornationalcarbonaccountingsystems