Cargando…

Generation of subject-specific, dynamic, multisegment ankle and foot models to improve orthotic design: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Currently, custom foot and ankle orthosis prescription and design tend to be based on traditional techniques, which can result in devices which vary greatly between clinicians and repeat prescription. The use of computational models of the foot may give further insight in the biomechanic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oosterwaal, Michiel, Telfer, Scott, Tørholm, Søren, Carbes, Sylvain, van Rhijn, Lodewijk W, Macduff, Ross, Meijer, Kenneth, Woodburn, Jim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22074482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-256
_version_ 1782218483933642752
author Oosterwaal, Michiel
Telfer, Scott
Tørholm, Søren
Carbes, Sylvain
van Rhijn, Lodewijk W
Macduff, Ross
Meijer, Kenneth
Woodburn, Jim
author_facet Oosterwaal, Michiel
Telfer, Scott
Tørholm, Søren
Carbes, Sylvain
van Rhijn, Lodewijk W
Macduff, Ross
Meijer, Kenneth
Woodburn, Jim
author_sort Oosterwaal, Michiel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, custom foot and ankle orthosis prescription and design tend to be based on traditional techniques, which can result in devices which vary greatly between clinicians and repeat prescription. The use of computational models of the foot may give further insight in the biomechanical effects of these devices and allow a more standardised approach to be taken to their design, however due to the complexity of the foot the models must be highly detailed and dynamic. METHODS/DESIGN: Functional and anatomical datasets will be collected in a multicentre study from 10 healthy participants and 15 patients requiring orthotic devices. The patient group will include individuals with metarsalgia, flexible flat foot and drop foot. Each participant will undergo a clinical foot function assessment, 3D surface scans of the foot under different loading conditions, and detailed gait analysis including kinematic, kinetic, muscle activity and plantar pressure measurements in both barefoot and shod conditions. Following this each participant will undergo computed tomography (CT) imaging of their foot and ankle under a range of loads and positions while plantar pressures are recorded. A further subgroup of participants will undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the foot and ankle. Imaging data will be segmented to derive the geometry of the bones and the orientation of the joint axes. Insertion points of muscles and ligaments will be determined from the MRI and CT-scans and soft tissue material properties computed from the loaded CT data in combination with the plantar pressure measurements. Gait analysis data will be used to drive the models and in combination with the 3D surface scans for scaling purposes. Predicted plantar pressures and muscle activation patterns predicted from the models will be compared to determine the validity of the models. DISCUSSION: This protocol will lead to the generation of unique datasets which will be used to develop linked inverse dynamic and forward dynamic biomechanical foot models. These models may be beneficial in predicting the effect of and thus improving the efficacy of orthotic devices for the foot and ankle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3234203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32342032011-12-09 Generation of subject-specific, dynamic, multisegment ankle and foot models to improve orthotic design: a feasibility study Oosterwaal, Michiel Telfer, Scott Tørholm, Søren Carbes, Sylvain van Rhijn, Lodewijk W Macduff, Ross Meijer, Kenneth Woodburn, Jim BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Currently, custom foot and ankle orthosis prescription and design tend to be based on traditional techniques, which can result in devices which vary greatly between clinicians and repeat prescription. The use of computational models of the foot may give further insight in the biomechanical effects of these devices and allow a more standardised approach to be taken to their design, however due to the complexity of the foot the models must be highly detailed and dynamic. METHODS/DESIGN: Functional and anatomical datasets will be collected in a multicentre study from 10 healthy participants and 15 patients requiring orthotic devices. The patient group will include individuals with metarsalgia, flexible flat foot and drop foot. Each participant will undergo a clinical foot function assessment, 3D surface scans of the foot under different loading conditions, and detailed gait analysis including kinematic, kinetic, muscle activity and plantar pressure measurements in both barefoot and shod conditions. Following this each participant will undergo computed tomography (CT) imaging of their foot and ankle under a range of loads and positions while plantar pressures are recorded. A further subgroup of participants will undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the foot and ankle. Imaging data will be segmented to derive the geometry of the bones and the orientation of the joint axes. Insertion points of muscles and ligaments will be determined from the MRI and CT-scans and soft tissue material properties computed from the loaded CT data in combination with the plantar pressure measurements. Gait analysis data will be used to drive the models and in combination with the 3D surface scans for scaling purposes. Predicted plantar pressures and muscle activation patterns predicted from the models will be compared to determine the validity of the models. DISCUSSION: This protocol will lead to the generation of unique datasets which will be used to develop linked inverse dynamic and forward dynamic biomechanical foot models. These models may be beneficial in predicting the effect of and thus improving the efficacy of orthotic devices for the foot and ankle. BioMed Central 2011-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3234203/ /pubmed/22074482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-256 Text en Copyright ©2011 Oosterwaal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Oosterwaal, Michiel
Telfer, Scott
Tørholm, Søren
Carbes, Sylvain
van Rhijn, Lodewijk W
Macduff, Ross
Meijer, Kenneth
Woodburn, Jim
Generation of subject-specific, dynamic, multisegment ankle and foot models to improve orthotic design: a feasibility study
title Generation of subject-specific, dynamic, multisegment ankle and foot models to improve orthotic design: a feasibility study
title_full Generation of subject-specific, dynamic, multisegment ankle and foot models to improve orthotic design: a feasibility study
title_fullStr Generation of subject-specific, dynamic, multisegment ankle and foot models to improve orthotic design: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Generation of subject-specific, dynamic, multisegment ankle and foot models to improve orthotic design: a feasibility study
title_short Generation of subject-specific, dynamic, multisegment ankle and foot models to improve orthotic design: a feasibility study
title_sort generation of subject-specific, dynamic, multisegment ankle and foot models to improve orthotic design: a feasibility study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22074482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-256
work_keys_str_mv AT oosterwaalmichiel generationofsubjectspecificdynamicmultisegmentankleandfootmodelstoimproveorthoticdesignafeasibilitystudy
AT telferscott generationofsubjectspecificdynamicmultisegmentankleandfootmodelstoimproveorthoticdesignafeasibilitystudy
AT tørholmsøren generationofsubjectspecificdynamicmultisegmentankleandfootmodelstoimproveorthoticdesignafeasibilitystudy
AT carbessylvain generationofsubjectspecificdynamicmultisegmentankleandfootmodelstoimproveorthoticdesignafeasibilitystudy
AT vanrhijnlodewijkw generationofsubjectspecificdynamicmultisegmentankleandfootmodelstoimproveorthoticdesignafeasibilitystudy
AT macduffross generationofsubjectspecificdynamicmultisegmentankleandfootmodelstoimproveorthoticdesignafeasibilitystudy
AT meijerkenneth generationofsubjectspecificdynamicmultisegmentankleandfootmodelstoimproveorthoticdesignafeasibilitystudy
AT woodburnjim generationofsubjectspecificdynamicmultisegmentankleandfootmodelstoimproveorthoticdesignafeasibilitystudy